Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787005
Establishing H Angle Hard Tissue and H Angle Soft Tissue Norms in Skeletal Class I Malay Adult Females and the Correlation between the H Angles and Visual Perception of Laypersons
Authors
Funding This research was funded by Kulliyyah of Dentistry Postgraduate—CHAIN grant from International Islamic University Malaysia (CHAIN 22-003-0003).
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to establish the cephalometric norms of H angle soft tissue and H angle hard tissue of Malaysian Malay adult females, and to evaluate the correlation between H angles and visual perception in skeletal Class I Malay adult females.
Materials and Methods Eighty-five lateral cephalograms of skeletal Class I (mean ANB value = 3.15 ± 0.77) Malaysian Malay female patients aged 20 to 40 years (mean age = 28.6 ± 5.86 degrees) taken from October 2017 to December 2021 were measured for H angle soft tissue and H angle hard tissue. Twenty silhouettes were then converted from cephalometric films and were rated according to facial convexity/concavity by 20 laypersons, with re-evaluation after 2 weeks for intra- and interexaminer reliabilities.
Results The means of the H angle soft tissue and H angle hard tissue were 15.75 ± 4.16 degrees and 11.64 ± 4.71 degrees, respectively. The intraexaminer reliability test for visual perception ranged from −0.89 to 0.99 indicating poor to excellent reliability, whereas the interexaminer reliability test was 0.82 indicating good reliability. A highly statistically significant association between the H angle soft tissue and H angle hard tissue (r = 0.938; p < 0.01) was found. There was no correlation between H angles and visual perception.
Conclusion The cephalometric norms of H angle hard tissue and H angle soft tissue in the Malaysian Malay female population were established: 11.64 degrees (±4.71 degrees) and 15.75 degrees (±4.16 degrees), respectively. There was a strong correlation between H angle soft tissue and H angle hard tissue among skeletal Class I Malay adult females. There was no correlation between H angles and the visual perception of laypersons.
Ethical Approval Statement
Ethical approval was obtained from IIUM Research Ethics Committee (registration number: IREC 2022-015). All the procedures have been performed as per the ethical guidelines laid down by Declaration of Helsinki (2013).
Data Availability Statement
Authors can be contacted for raw data by e-mail.
Publication History
Article published online:
16 July 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Salzmann JA. Practice of Orthodontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1966
- 2 Felemban OM, Alharabi NT, Alamoudi RAA, Alturki GA, Helal NM. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment among patients and parents in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. J Orthod Sci 2022; 11 (11) 25
- 3 Chu CS, Marizan Nor M, Mohamed AM, Mohd Hadi Pritam H. Hard and soft tissue shape variation and changes in Class II division 1 malocclusion during orthodontic treatment: a geometric morphometric analysis. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 931
- 4 Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966; 52 (11) 804-822
- 5 Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953; 39 (10) 729-755
- 6 Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957; 27: 14-37
- 7 Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980; 38 (10) 744-751
- 8 Ricketts RM. A foundation for cephalometric communication. Am J Orthod 1960; 46 (05) 330-357
- 9 Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983; 84 (01) 1-28
- 10 Dong T, Ye N, Yuan L, Wu S, Xia L, Fang B. Assessing the influence of chin asymmetry on perceived facial esthetics with 3-dimensional images. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 78 (08) 1389-1396
- 11 Shah R, Nair R. Comparative evaluation of facial attractiveness by laypersons in terms of facial proportions and equate it's deviation from divine proportions - a photographic study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2022; 12 (05) 492-499
- 12 Pietruski P, Majak M. The concept of ideal Caucasian male lips: an anthropometric analysis of the lower third of the face. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (10) 1130-1141
- 13 Godinho J, Fernandes D, Pires P, Jardim L. Cephalometric determinants of facial attractiveness: a quadratic correlation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2023; 163 (03) 398-406
- 14 Björk A. The face in profile. An anthropological X-ray investigation on Swedish children and conscripts. Svensk Tandlakare-Tidskrift 1947; 40 (5B): 1-180
- 15 Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948; 34 (10) 812-840
- 16 Ravikumar D, N S, Ramakrishna M, Sharna N, Robindro W. Evaluation of McNamara's analysis in South Indian (Tamil Nadu) children between 8-12 years of age using lateral cephalograms. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2019; 9 (02) 193-197
- 17 Storniolo-Souza JM, Seminario MP, Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Pinzan A, Janson G. McNamara analysis cephalometric parameters in White-Brazilians, Japanese and Japanese-Brazilians with normal occlusion. Dental Press J Orthod 2021; 26 (01) e2119133
- 18 Pamukçu H, Tunçer Nİ, Pelin İC, Zengin HY. Cephalometric mandibular dimensions in growing Turkish children: trends of change, sex-specific differences, and comparisons with published norms. Turk J Orthod 2022; 35 (03) 198-206
- 19 Mohammad HA, Abu Hassan MI, Hussain SF. Cephalometric evaluation for Malaysian Malay by Steiner analysis. Sci Res Essays 2011; 6 (03) 627-634
- 20 Purmal K, Alam MK, Mohammad N, Zam Z. Cephalometric norms of Malaysian adult Chinese. Int Med J 2013; 20 (01) 87-91
- 21 Noor NFM, Basri R, Alam MK, Haque S, Hao MSJ, Talib MA. Soft tissue cephalometric measurements among Malaysian Malays and Chinese. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2020; 20: e4978
- 22 Lersinghanart K, Boonpratham S, Luppanapornlarp S. Correlation between H angles and visual perception in skeletal type I females. M Dent J 2020; 40 (03) 257-266
- 23 Arifin WN. Sample size calculator (web). Accessed January 3, 2024, available at http://wnarifin.github.io
- 24 Mills JRE. Principles and Practice of Orthodontics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1982
- 25 Tang X, Cai J, Lin B, Yao L, Lin F. Motivation of adult female patients seeking orthodontic treatment: an application of Q-methodology. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9: 249-256
- 26 Kim SJ, Kim KH, Yu HS, Baik HS. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 145 (03) 317-324
- 27 ALBarakati SF, Bindayel NA. Holdaway soft tissue cephalometric standards for Saudi adults. King Saud Univ J Dent Sci 2012; 3 (01) 27-32
- 28 Panezai S, Mengal N, Ahmed K. Determination of cephalometric soft tissue norms for local population with normal occlusion using Holdaway analysis. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2021; 71 (02) 557-561
- 29 Choki M, Boonpratham S, Luppanapornlarp S. Correlation between objective evaluation and subjective evaluation of facial profile in skeletal Type II females. APOS Trends Orthod 2021; 11 (03) 223-228
- 30 Noviaranny IY, Hissam NK, Abu Bakar PUA. Holdaway soft tissue cephalometric standard for Malay adults. Compend Oral Sci 2022; 9 (02) 44-53
- 31 Cezairli NS. Comparisons of soft tissue thickness measurements in adult patients with various vertical patterns. Meandros Med Dent J 2017; 18: 120-129
- 32 Sahin Sağlam AM, Gazilerli U. Analysis of Holdaway soft-tissue measurements in children between 9 and 12 years of age. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23 (03) 287-294
- 33 Shamlan MA, Aldrees AM. Hard and soft tissue correlations in facial profiles: a canonical correlation study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2015; 7: 9-15
- 34 Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J. et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116 (03) 239-253
