Attitudes of Health Care Providers in Relation to Disability, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background Among the main barriers that prevent people with disabilities from seeking help and support are negative attitudes of society in general and health care professionals in particular. However, only a few studies looked into the attitudes of health care providers toward people with disabilities in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of health care providers in relation to people with disabilities.

Participants and Methods The attitudes toward disabled persons (ATDP) scale was administered among n = 1,033 health care providers in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The data were analyzed using JASP version 19 and Orange 3.26.0. Demographic data were analyzed using dummy encoding.

Results The mean ATDP score for 1,033 respondents was 58.03 (p = 0.000). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that respondents aged 24 to 25 years have significantly less positive attitudes, compared to participants aged 18 to 20 years (p = 0.004). No sufficient evidence was found whether marital status significantly affects attitudes toward people with disabilities. In contrast, participants with three or more children have a significantly (p = 0.014) less positive attitude compared to those who do not have children.

Conclusion This study found that, overall, health care professionals had slightly negative attitudes, according to the ATDP scale. However, younger respondents and those without children were more positive. Future research is recommended to collect more data on the significance of having children and its association with attitudes toward disabilities. More educational programs are recommended that can increase attitudes and awareness about people with disabilities.

Keywords

disability - attitudes - demographic data - health care providers - Saudi Arabia

Authors' Contributions

A.W. was responsible for conceptualization, design, and interpretation of data; drafting the manuscript; and revising for important intellectual content. N.J. was responsible for the methodology, validation, and revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. L.H.Al-J. was responsible for data collection, validation, and drafting the manuscript. J.B. was responsible for data curation, design, methodology, and revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. E.M.Al.Z. was responsible for the methodology, data collection, and revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. R.Y.Al-A. was responsible for data curation, interpretation of data, and project supervision. S.H.Q. was responsible for the methodology, interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. All the authors participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with Ethical Principles

The administration of the study was confirmed by the Institutional Review Board of Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences (approval no.: IRB-2022-VDPSR-002). Informed consent was obtained from the participants before they filled out the online questionnaire.

Publication History

Article published online:
04 June 2024

• References

• 1 Shiloh S, Heruti I, Berkovitz T. Attitudes toward people with disabilities caused by illness or injury: beyond physical impairment. Int J Rehabil Res 2011; 34 (04) 321-329
• 2 Tervo RC, Palmer G, Redinius P. Health professional student attitudes towards people with disability. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18 (08) 908-915
• 3 VanPuymbrouck L, Friedman C, Feldner H. Explicit and implicit disability attitudes of healthcare providers. Rehabil Psychol 2020; 65 (02) 101-112
• 4 Havercamp SM, Barnhart WR, Robinson AC, Whalen Smith CN. What should we teach about disability? National consensus on disability competencies for health care education. Disabil Health J 2021; 14 (02) 100989
• 5 Kim KS, Park YH, Lee BS. et al. Comparison of the attitudes toward and contact with disabled person among health care professionals, lay persons, and disabled persons. Korean J Rehabil Nurs 2010; 13 (01) 13-22
• 6 White MJ, Olson RS. Attitudes toward people with disabilities: a comparison of rehabilitation nurses, occupational therapists, and physical therapists. Rehabil Nurs 1998; 23 (03) 126-131
• 7 Thompson TL, Emrich K, Moore G. The effect of curriculum on the attitudes of nursing students toward disability. Rehabil Nurs 2003; 28 (01) 27-30
• 8 Devkota HR, Murray E, Kett M, Groce N. Healthcare provider's attitude towards disability and experience of women with disabilities in the use of maternal healthcare service in rural Nepal. Reprod Health 2017; 14 (01) 79
• 9 de Vries McClintock HF, Barg FK, Katz SP. et al. Health care experiences and perceptions among people with and without disabilities. Disabil Health J 2016; 9 (01) 74-82
• 10 Yuker HE, Block JR, Young JH. The Measurement of Attitudes toward Disabled Persons. Albertson, NY:: Human Resources Center;; 1970
• 11 Khan TM, Muhammad U, Naeem A, Marryam M. Attitude of medical professionals towards persons with disabilities. Annals of PIMS ISSN. 2016; 1815: 2287
• 12 Dorji S, Solomon P. Attitudes of health professionals toward persons with disabilities in Bhutan. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2009; 20 (02) 32-42
• 13 Orgera K, Artiga S. Disparities in health and health care: five key questions and answers. Henry J Kais Fam Found 2018
• 14 Satchidanand N, Gunukula SK, Lam WY. et al. Attitudes of healthcare students and professionals toward patients with physical disability: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 91 (06) 533-545
• 15 Breau G, Baumbusch J, Thorne S, Hislop TG, Kazanjian A. Primary care providers' attitudes towards individuals with intellectual disability: associations with experience and demographics. J Intellect Disabil 2021; 25 (01) 65-81
• 16 Battal ZM. Special education in Saudi Arabia. Int J Technol Incl Educ. 2016; 5 (02) 880-886
• 17 The United Nations Children's Fund. Inclusive Education. Accessed March 13, 2022 at: https://www.unicef.org/education/inclusive-education
• 18 Zheng Q, Tian Q, Hao C. et al. Comparison of attitudes toward disability and people with disability among caregivers, the public, and people with disability: findings from a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2016; 16 (01) 1024
• 19 Kiliç E, Çitil R. Attitudes of physicians and nurses towards the disabled and awareness of applications for the disabled in a university hospital. Turkish J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019; 13 (02) 129-141
• 20 Çavdar S, Şimşek Ç, Gündüz B, Yalçınkaya EY. The challenges of disabled people and family caregivers: social inclusion perspective. BAFLAS 2021; 5 (01) 29-41
• 21 Bigler RS, Liben LS. Developmental intergroup theory: explaining and reducing children's social stereotyping and prejudice. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2007; 16 (03) 162-166
• 22 Hong SY, Kwon KA, Jeon HJ. Children's attitudes towards peers with disabilities: associations with personal and parental factors. Infant Child Dev 2014; 23 (02) 170-193
• 23 Vuong V, Palmer M. Love thy neighbour? Social attitudes towards persons with disabilities. World Dev 2024; 174: 106464
• 24 Saetermoe CL, Scattone D, Kim KH. Ethnicity and the stigma of disabilities. Psychol Health 2001; 16 (06) 699-713
• 25 Whyte SR, Ingstad B. Disability and culture: an overview. In: Ingstad B, White S. eds. Disability and Culture. Berkeley, CA:: University of California Press;; 1995: 3-2
• 26 Halder S, Assaf LC. Inclusion, Disability and Culture. Cham:: Springer; 2017