Building a Stronger Backbone: 3D Printing's Role in Treating Spinal Cord Conditions

Abstract

Spinal cord injuries (SCIs) pose significant challenges as complete nerve regeneration remains limited. The demand for improved technologies in SCI treatment is evident. One such emerging technology is three-dimensional printing (3DP), which, coupled with advancements in medical imaging and bioengineering, has significantly enhanced precision in surgical procedures. This systematic review aims to explore 3DP as a treatment option for SCIs, examining its cost, efficacy, safety, and the associated technological constraints. A systematic search of Medline was conducted through PubMed for literature published since 2019. The search results were exported to Rayyan for abstract and full-text screening following predefined criteria. The risk of bias in the selected studies was assessed using the RoB2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. From a total of 89 articles screened, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria, collectively assessing 237 individuals with various types of SCIs, including lumbar degeneration, en bloc resection of thoracolumbar metastasis, adult spinal deformity, and cervical degeneration. These studies examined the utilization of 3DP devices such as hand orthosis, interbody fusion cages, lamellar titanium cages, artificial vertebral bodies, and others. Most of the reviewed studies reported positive treatment outcomes, with the actual procedure costs varying from $65 to $5,000. Recent literature shows positive outcomes in the use of 3DP technologies for SCIs, highlighting its potential for enhancing both surgical and nonsurgical interventions. These advancements usher in a new era in SCI treatment, providing enhanced precision and a wider range of treatment options, ultimately leading to more comprehensive and effective patient care.

Keywords

3D bioprinting - SCI surgery - bioengineering - cost-efficiency - neuroregeneration

Ethical Approval

This systematic review adheres to ethical guidelines and standards for conducting research. Data used are from published studies and do not involve human subjects directly.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. September 2024

• References

• 1 Venugopal C, Chandanala S, Prasad HC, Nayeem D, Bhonde RR, Dhanushkodi A. Regenerative therapy for hippocampal degenerative diseases: lessons from preclinical studies. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2017; 11 (02) 321-333
• 2 Sobrido-Cameán D, Barreiro-Iglesias A. Role of caspase-8 and Fas in cell death after spinal cord injury. Front Mol Neurosci 2018; 11: 101
• 3 Orr MB, Gensel JC. Interactions of primary insult biomechanics and secondary cascades in spinal cord injury: implications for therapy. Neural Regen Res 2017; 12 (10) 1618-1619
• 4 Sabelström H, Stenudd M, Frisén J. Neural stem cells in the adult spinal cord. Exp Neurol 2014; 260: 44-49
• 5 Breslin K, Agrawal D. The use of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury: a review of the evidence, controversies, and recommendations. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28 (11) 1238-1245 , quiz 1246–1248
• 6 Hurlbert RJ. Methylprednisolone for the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: point. Neurosurgery 2014; 61 (Suppl. 01) 32-35
• 7 Silva NA, Sousa N, Reis RL, Salgado AJ. From basics to clinical: a comprehensive review on spinal cord injury. Prog Neurobiol 2014; 114: 25-57
• 8 Yuan TY, Zhang J, Yu T, Wu JP, Liu QY. 3D bioprinting for spinal cord injury repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10: 847344
• 9 Garg B, Mehta N. Current status of 3D printing in spine surgery. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2018; 9 (03) 218-225
• 10 Tong Y, Kaplan DJ, Spivak JM, Bendo JA. Three-dimensional printing in spine surgery: a review of current applications. Spine J 2020; 20 (06) 833-846
• 11 Kabra A, Mehta N, Garg B. 3D printing in spine care: a review of current applications. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2022; 35: 102044
• 12 Yeh PC, Chen CH, Chen CS. Using a 3D-printed hand orthosis to improve three-jaw Chuck hand function in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2023; 31: 2552-2559
• 13 Yoo HJ, Lee S, Kim J, Park C, Lee B. Development of 3D-printed myoelectric hand orthosis for patients with spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16 (01) 162
• 14 Sun Z, Jia R, Wang X, Pang X. Three-dimensional simulation/printing-assisted surgery for symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression of posterior column: efficacy assessment based on 2-year follow-up. Front Surg 2023; 10: 1177280
• 15 Segi N, Nakashima H, Shinjo R. et al. Vertebral endplate concavity in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: tapered 3D-printed porous titanium cage versus squared PEEK cage. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59 (02) 372
• 16 Petrone S, Marengo N, Ajello M. et al. Cortical bone trajectory technique's outcomes and procedures for posterior lumbar fusion: a retrospective study. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 76: 25-30
• 17 Cao Y, Yang N, Wang S. et al. The application of 3D-printed auto-stable artificial vertebral body in en bloc resection and reconstruction of thoracolumbar metastases. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18 (01) 638
• 18 Shin HD, Ahn DH, Lee HA. et al. Customized power wheelchair joysticks made by three-dimensional printing technology: a pilot study on the environmental adaptation effects for severe quadriplegia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (14) 7464
• 19 Jin YZ, Zhao B, Lu XD. et al. Mid- and long-term follow-up efficacy ̀analysis of 3D-printed interbody fusion cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Orthop Surg 2021; 13 (07) 1969-1978
• 20 Kapadia N, Jovanovic L, Musselman K, Wang R, Marquez-Chin C, Popovic MR. Preliminary evaluation of the reliability and validity of the 3D printed Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Hand Function Test in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44 (suppl 1): S225-S233
• 21 Mokawem M, Katzouraki G, Harman CL, Lee R. Lumbar interbody fusion rates with 3D-printed lamellar titanium cages using a silicate-substituted calcium phosphate bone graft. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 68: 134-139