Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791690
Neck Lift to Treat Platysma Bands and Defining Cervical Angle: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
Authors
Abstract
Many surgical techniques have been proposed to address the submental–cervical angle in neck lift. Despite the several advances, obstacles persist when dealing with platysma bands and redefinition of the obtuse cervical angle. The aim of this study was to quantify platysma bands recurrence, any neurovascular damage, and other complications following neck lift procedures involving platysma muscle. After the approval and registration on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), the systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A series of specific keywords and predefined MeSH terms were utilized in different search engines (Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane library databases). Primary outcome was the recurrence of platysma bands; secondary outcomes included any postoperative complications, including any nerve damage. Pooled analysis was performed using a random effects model. Twelve articles, encompassing 2,106 patients, were relevant to this issue and included data on neck lift surgery with any platysma transection outcomes. Twenty-six patients had a recurrence of platysma bands during the follow-up, with a pooled rate of 1.4%. The pooled overall nerve damage rate was 0.9%. At the reported follow-up, the pooled hematoma percentage was 1.8%, and the pooled sialoma rate was 0.3%. Even less common complications were long-lasting edema, dehiscence of the submental suspension, and skin necrosis. Cervicomental angle redefinition remains a controversial and complicated procedure, which can be approached with different maneuvers. However, more long-term outcome reports as well as standardized complication outcomes are warranted in order to compare different and new techniques.
Level of Evidence III
Keywords
platysma bands - platysmotomy - neck bands - neck rejuvenation - face lift - rhytidoplasty - rhytidectomy - hematoma - ecchymosis - complicationsPublication History
Article published online:
15 October 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Auersvald A, Auersvald LA. Management of the submandibular gland in neck lifts: indications, techniques, pearls, and pitfalls. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 507-525
- 2 Pelle-Ceravolo M, Angelini M, Silvi E. Complete platysma transection in neck rejuvenation: a critical appraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (04) 781-791
- 3 Sun W, Ma H, Song T. The underappreciated role of the platysma muscle in the perioral expressions in young adults. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43 (02) 195-201
- 4 Trévidic P, Criollo-Lamilla G. Platysma bands: is a change needed in the surgical paradigm?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (01) 41-47
- 5 Yi KH, Lee HJ, Lee JH. et al. Sonoanatomy of the platysmal bands: what causes the platysmal band?. Surg Radiol Anat 2023; 45 (11) 1399-1404
- 6 Pelle-Ceravolo M, Angelini M, Silvi E. Treatment of anterior neck aging without a submental approach: lateral skin-platysma displacement, a new and proven technique for platysma bands and skin laxity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 308-321
- 7 Naini FB, Cobourne MT, McDonald F, Wertheim D. Submental-cervical angle: perceived attractiveness and threshold values of desire for surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2016; 15 (04) 469-477
- 8 Pascali M, Gualdi A, Bottini DJ, Botti C, Botti G, Cervelli V. An original application of the Endotine Ribbon device for brow lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 1652-1661
- 9 Connell BF. Neck contour deformities. The art, engineering, anatomic diagnosis, architectural planning, and aesthetics of surgical correction. Clin Plast Surg 1987; 14 (04) 683-692
- 10 Mejia JD, Nahai FR, Nahai F, Momoh AO. Isolated management of the aging neck. Semin Plast Surg 2009; 23 (04) 264-273
- 11 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
- 12 Sugrue CM, Joyce CW, Carroll SM. Levels of evidence in plastic and reconstructive surgery research: have we improved over the past 10 years?. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (09) e2408
- 13 Brodley CE, Lau J, Schmid CH. et al. Open Meta-analyst. Accessed October 7, 2024 at: http://www.cebm.brown.edu/openmeta/#
- 14 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327 (7414): 557-560
- 15 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7 (03) 177-188
- 16 Jacono AA, Parikh SS. The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (08) 874-890
- 17 Labbé D, Giot JP, Kaluzinski E. Submental area rejuvenation by digastric corset: anatomical study and clinical application in 20 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (02) 222-231
- 18 Langsdon PR, Velargo PA, Rodwell III DW, Denys D. Submental muscular medialization and suspension. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (07) 953-966
- 19 Feldman JJ. Neck lift my way: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1173-1183
- 20 Mani M. Total composite flap facelift and the deep-plane transition zone: a critical consideration in SMAS-release midface lifting. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (05) 533-545
- 21 Yousif NJ, Matloub HS, Sanger JR. Hyoid suspension neck lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (06) 1181-1190
- 22 Auersvald A, Auersvald LA, Oscar Uebel C. Subplatysmal necklift: a retrospective analysis of 504 patients. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (01) 1-11
- 23 Jacono AA, Malone MH. Characterization of the cervical retaining ligaments during subplatysmal facelift dissection and its implications. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (05) 495-501
- 24 Gronovich Y. Innovative surgical approach using a mesh sling for the aging neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (06) 1386-1391
- 25 Langsdon PR, Renukuntla S, Obeid AA, Smith AM, Karter NS. Analysis of cervical angle in the submental muscular medialization and suspension procedure. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (01) 56-60
- 26 Meningaud JP, Pensato R, Pineau V. et al. Facelift: assessment of total platysma muscle transection to prevent the recurrence of platysmal bands. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48 (02) 122-133
- 27 de Castro CC, Aboudib Jr JH, Roxo ACW. Updating the concepts on neck lift and lower third of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (01) 199-205
- 28 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 187-196
- 29 Gualdi A, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Gatti J. et al. Double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (03) 348e-356e
- 30 Gualdi A, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Gatti J. et al. Minimal undermining suspension technique (MUST): combined eyebrow and mid-face lift via temporal access. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (01) 40-46
- 31 de Maio M. The 7-point Shape and the 9-point Shape: an innovative nonsurgical approach to improve the facial shape. Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38 (02) 102-110
- 32 Shaw Jr RB, Katzel EB, Koltz PF, Kahn DM, Girotto JA, Langstein HN. Aging of the mandible and its aesthetic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (01) 332-342
- 33 Pessa JE. SMAS fusion zones determine the subfascial and subcutaneous anatomy of the human face: fascial spaces, fat compartments, and models of facial aging. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (05) 515-526
- 34 Rohrich RJ, Narasimhan K. Long-term results in face lifting: observational results and evolution of technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 97-108
- 35 Alghoul M, Codner MA. Retaining ligaments of the face: review of anatomy and clinical applications. Aesthet Surg J 2013; 33 (06) 769-782
