PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2025; 19(02): 513-522
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791785
Original Article

Effect of Cross-sectional Designs on Torsional Resistance of Endodontic Nickel–Titanium Files: A Finite Element Study

Natchaphon Nanthaprathip
1   Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Phyathai, Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Sarita Morakul
1   Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Phyathai, Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Sirawut Hiran-us
2   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Pairod Singhatanadgid 
1   Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Phyathai, Patumwan, Bangkok, Thailand
› Institutsangaben Funding This research was funded by the Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund Chulalongkorn University (HEA662100083).
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to assess the influence of two key design parameters on the torsional resistance of endodontic rotary files: the ratio of the equivalent radius (re ) to the polar moment of inertia (J), or re /J ratio, and the percentage of the inner core area. Understanding these factors can guide the development of files with improved performance during root canal procedures.

Materials and Methods Finite element analysis was employed to simulate the behavior of rotary files under torsional loading conditions. This method allowed for the investigation of maximum shear stress across various cross-sections (D4–D16) of the files. The relationship between the re /J ratio and the maximum shear stress was also evaluated. To assess the impact of cross-sectional design modifications on stress distribution, the study analyzed files with progressively changing configurations.

Results Regions situated outside the inner core circle experienced lower shear stress compared with a circular shaft. Furthermore, a strong linear correlation was observed between the maximum shear stress experienced by the file, the applied torque during operation, and the re /J ratio. Significantly, the study established a connection between the percentage of the inner core area and the torsional resistance of the file. Files with a larger inner core area exhibited a lower coefficient (C) within a newly derived torsional formula. This lower C value directly translated to a reduction in the maximum shear stress experienced by the file. In essence, files with a higher percentage of inner core area demonstrated enhanced torsional resistance, allowing them to withstand higher torsional loads encountered during root canal procedures.

Conclusion This study identified the re /J ratio and the percentage of inner core area as the most critical design factors influencing the torsional resistance of rotary files. Files with a lower re /J ratio and a larger inner core area experienced lower shear stress, resulting in enhanced torsional resistance and potentially reducing the risk of torsional fracture during use. These findings offer valuable insights for both clinicians selecting rotary files and manufacturers designing future iterations, ultimately contributing to improved safety and efficacy during root canal treatments.

Keywords

torsional resistance - shear stress - endodontic - rotary file - cross-sectional design - finite element analysis


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. November 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 1995; 21 (04) 173-176
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Schäfer E, Schlingemann R. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2003; 36 (03) 208-217
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Nakatsukasa T, Ebihara A, Kimura S. et al. Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties and shaping performance of heat-treated nickel titanium rotary instruments used in the single-length technique. Dent Mater J 2021; 40 (03) 743-749
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Lakshmanan L, Jeevanandan G, Maganur PC, Vishwanathaiah S. Fracture incidence of Kedo-S square pediatric rotary files: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (03) 594-598
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Campos GO, Fontana CE, Vieira VTL, Elias CN, de Martin AS, Bueno CEDS. Influence of heat treatment of nickel-titanium instruments on cyclic fatigue resistance in simulated curved canals. Eur J Dent 2023; 17 (02) 472-477
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cheung GSP. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2007; 16 (01) 1-26
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 McGuigan MB, Louca C, Duncan HF. Endodontic instrument fracture: causes and prevention. Br Dent J 2013; 214 (07) 341-348
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Madarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PM. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J Endod 2013; 39 (05) 569-581
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Sekar V, Kumar R, Nandini S, Ballal S, Velmurugan N. Assessment of the role of cross section on fatigue resistance of rotary files when used in reciprocation. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (04) 541-545
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Pinto JC, Torres FFE, Santos-Junior AO, Duarte MAH, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Safety and effectiveness of additional apical preparation using a rotary heat-treated nickel-titanium file with larger diameter and minimum taper in retreatment of curved root canals. Eur J Dent 2021; 15 (02) 247-252
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Akçay A, Gorduysus M, Gorduysus MO, Annamma LM, Müftüoglu S. A comparative evaluation of the cleaning efficacy of five different root canal irrigation devices: a histological study. Eur J Dent 2024; 18 (03) 827-833
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2004; 30 (10) 722-725
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000; 26 (03) 161-165
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Varghese NO, Pillai R, Sujathen UN, Sainudeen S, Antony A, Paul S. Resistance to torsional failure and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Mtwo files in continuous and reciprocating motion: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19 (03) 225-230
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S. et al. Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. J Endod 2016; 42 (01) 156-159
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM, Badr AE. Torsional and bending resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive instruments. Int Endod J 2017; 50 (11) 1077-1083
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Silva E, Oliveira de Lima C, Vieira V, Antunes H, Lima Moreira EJ, Versiani M. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of four martensite-based nickel titanium reciprocating instruments. Eur Endod J 2020; 5 (03) 231-235
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Hiran-Us S, Morakul S. Effect of temperatures on cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different Ni-Ti alloy files. Int Dent J 2023; 73 (06) 904-909
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Yum J, Cheung GS, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Torsional strength and toughness of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 2011; 37 (03) 382-386
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Abualjadayel B, Alanazi M, Alkhalifah A, Jamleh A. Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19 (01) 124
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Sivas Yilmaz Ö, Keskin C, Aydemir H. Comparison of the torsional resistance of 4 different glide path instruments. J Endod 2021; 47 (06) 970-975
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Necchi S, Petrini L, Taschieri S, Migliavacca F. A comparative computational analysis of the mechanical behavior of two nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 2010; 36 (08) 1380-1384
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Arbab-Chirani R, Chevalier V, Arbab-Chirani S, Calloch S. Comparative analysis of torsional and bending behavior through finite-element models of 5 Ni-Ti endodontic instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111 (01) 115-121
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Martins SCS, Silva JD, Garcia PR, Viana ACD, Buono VTL, Santos LA. Influence of cyclic loading in NiTi austenitic and R-phase endodontic files from a finite element perspective. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26 (05) 3939-3947
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Martins JNR, Silva EJNL, Marques D. et al. Comparison of five rotary systems regarding design, metallurgy, mechanical performance, and canal preparation-a multimethod research. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26 (03) 3299-3310
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparative evaluation of cyclic fatigue resistance of four different nickel-titanium rotary files with different cross-sectional designs and alloy properties. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21 (05) 1527-1530
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Seracchiani M, Miccoli G, Di Nardo D. et al. Effect of flexural stress on torsional resistance of NiTi instruments. J Endod 2021; 47 (03) 472-476
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Jamleh A, Almedlej R, Alomar R, Almayouf N, Alfadley A, Alfouzan K. Evidence for reduced torsional resistance of rotary files under curved position. Saudi Dent J 2021; 33 (07) 614-619
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Liang Y, Yue L. Evolution and development: engine-driven endodontic rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int J Oral Sci 2022; 14 (01) 12
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Lee JY, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Kim HC. Ex-vivo comparison of torsional stress on nickel-titanium instruments activated by continuous rotation or adaptive motion. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13 (08) 1900
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gambarini G, Seracchiani M, Zanza A, Miccoli G, Del Giudice A, Testarelli L. Influence of shaft length on torsional behavior of endodontic nickel-titanium instruments. Odontology 2021; 109 (03) 568-573
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ha JH, Kwak SW, Versluis A, Lee CJ, Park SH, Kim HC. The geometric effect of an off-centered cross-section on nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a finite element analysis study. J Dent Sci 2017; 12 (02) 173-178
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Martins SCS, Garcia PR, Viana ACD, Buono VTL, Santos LA. Off-centered geometry and influence on NiTi endodontic File performance evaluated by finite element analysis. J Mater Eng Perform 2020; 29 (04) 2095-2102
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Xu X, Eng M, Zheng Y, Eng D. Comparative study of torsional and bending properties for six models of nickel-titanium root canal instruments with different cross-sections. J Endod 2006; 32 (04) 372-375
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Torsion and bending properties of OneShape and WaveOne instruments. J Endod 2015; 41 (04) 544-547
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Kim HC, Kim HJ, Lee CJ, Kim BM, Park JK, Versluis A. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2009; 42 (07) 593-602
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Baek S-H, Lee C-J, Versluis A, Kim B-M, Lee W, Kim H-C. Comparison of torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary files with different geometric characteristics. J Endod 2011; 37 (09) 1283-1286
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Zanza A, Seracchiani M, Di Nardo D, Reda R, Gambarini G, Testarelli L. A paradigm shift for torsional stiffness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a finite element analysis. J Endod 2021; 47 (07) 1149-1156
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Hibbeler RC. Mechanics of Materials. 10th ed. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson; 2018
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 40 El-Anwar MI, Yousief SA, Kataia EM, El-Wahab TM. Finite element study on continuous rotating versus reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments. Braz Dent J 2016; 27 (04) 436-441
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 3630-1: Dental root canal instruments-Part 1: files, reamers, barbed broaches, rasps, paste carriers, explorers and cotton broaches. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1992
  • 42 He R, Ni J. Design improvement and failure reduction of endodontic files through finite element analysis: application to V-Taper file designs. J Endod 2010; 36 (09) 1552-1557
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar