RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1792009
Beverage-Induced Surface Changes in Biomimetic Dental Resin Composite: AFM and Bacterial Analysis

Abstract
Objective Continuous advancements in composite resin materials have revolutionized and expanded its clinical use, improving its physical and mechanical properties. Attaining and retaining surface texture and gloss are crucial for the long-term durability of the composite resin material. This study investigated the supra-nanospherical filler composite material compared with different composite resin materials immersed in different beverages. The study evaluated their surface roughness and subsequent adhesion of bacteria.
Materials and methods A total of 144 specimens were made, using Teflon mold from different composite materials. Eighty-four specimens were used for surface roughness testing, using four different resin composite materials, Tetric N-Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Multichrome (Harvard Dental, Germany), Filtek Z350 XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, United States), and Palfique LX5 (Tokuyama Dental Corporation, Taitō-Ku, Tokyo, Japan; n = 21). They were further subdivided into three subgroups according to the immersion solution (n = 7) for Monster, Gatorade, and deionized water, which served as the control group. Surface roughness values were tested via atomic force microscopy (AFM). Then, for biofilm testing the bacterial count was performed on the remaining 60 composite specimens from the four tested composite materials (n = 15), that were subdivided randomly based on the immersion solutions into three subgroups (n = 5).
Statistical analysis Data were collected and statistically analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni's correction (p ≤ 0.05). The intergroup comparison showed a significant difference among different composite materials (p < 0.05), with the Multichrome showing the highest roughness values. Also, there was a significant difference between all composite materials with different beverages, with Palfique LX5 showing the lowest average roughness (Ra) values. All studied materials' average surface roughness, however, remained below the crucial Ra value of 0.2 μm. For the bacterial count, there was a significant difference between different materials in different beverages (p < 0.05), with Z350 XT and Palfique LX5 showing the lowest bacterial count.
Conclusion Supra-nanospherical composite (Palfique LX5) exhibited better resistance to different beverage challenges regarding surface roughness, while nanohybrid composite (Z350) showed the least bacterial adherence.
Keywords
supra-nanodental composite - energy drinks - sports drinks - surface roughness - bacterial adhesion - conservative dentistryData Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Dezember 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Ardu S, Duc O, Di Bella E, Krejci I, Daher R. Color stability of different composite resins after polishing. Odontology 2018; 106 (03) 328-333
- 2 Subramaniam P, Bhat D, Gupta M, Gulzar S, Shah AH. The effect of usage of antiasthmatic inhalers on color stability and surface roughness of dental restorative materials: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2024; 18 (02) 645-651
- 3 Al-Angari SS, Eckert GJ, Sabrah AHA. Color stability, roughness, and microhardness of enamel and composites submitted to staining/bleaching cycles. Saudi Dent J 2021; 33: 215-221
- 4 Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95 (02) 137-142
- 5 Meenakshi CM, Sirisha K. Surface quality and color stability of posterior composites in acidic beverages. J Conserv Dent 2020; 23 (01) 57-61
- 6 Shenkin JD, Heller KE, Warren JJ, Marshall TA. Soft drink consumption and caries risk in children and adolescents. Gen Dent 2003; 51: 30-36
- 7 Bhaumik S. The public health threat from sugary drinks in India. BMJ 2014; 349: g6216-g6222
- 8 Bansal K, Acharya SR, Saraswathi V. Effect of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages on color stability and surface roughness of resin composites: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2012; 15: 283-288
- 9 Arocha MA, Mayoral JR, Lefever D, Mercade M, Basilio J, Roig M. Colour stability of siloranes versus methacrylate-based composites after immersion in staining solutions. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1481-1487
- 10 Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B. Stainability of esthetic restorative materials after cyclic immersion in various beverages. J Dent Assoc Thai 2015; 65: 52-59
- 11 Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozel S. Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period. J Appl Oral Sci 2013; 21 (02) 124-131
- 12 Vidal MG, De Oliveira PH, Lima-Arsati YBO, Rodrigues JA. The effect of dilution on the erosive potential of maltodextrin-containing sports drinks. Rev Odontol UNESP 2017; 46 (01) 28-32
- 13 Paula AB, Fúcio SBP, Ambrosano GMB, Alonso RCB, Sardi JCO, Puppin-Rontani RM. Biodegradation and abrasive wear of nano restorative materials. Oper Dent 2011; 36 (06) 670-677
- 14 Lussi A, Megert B, Shellis RP, Wang X. Analysis of the erosive effect of different dietary substances and medications. Br J Nutr 2012; 107: 252-262
- 15 Malinauskas BM, Aeby VG, Overton RF, Carpenter-Aeby T, Barber-Heidal K. A survey of energy drink consumption patterns among college students. Nutr J 2007; 6: 35-42
- 16 Arpacı N, Tosun S, Ersoy G. Sports and energy drink consumption of physical education & sports students' and their knowledge about them. Ovidius Univ Ann Phys Educ Sport Sci, Mov Health Ser 2010; 10 (Suppl. 02) 732-736
- 17 Arria AM, O'Brien MC. The “high” risk of energy drinks. JAMA 2011; 305: 600-601
- 18 Smit HJ, Cotton JR, Hughes SC, Rogers PJ. Mood and cognitive performance effects of “energy” drink constituents: caffeine, glucose and carbonation. Nutr Neurosci 2004; 7: 127-139
- 19 Lepri CP, Palma-Dibb RG. Surface roughness and color change of a composite: influence of beverages and brushing. Dent Mater J 2012; 31 (04) 689-696
- 20 De Oliveira GU, Mondelli RFL, Rodrigues MC, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, Wang L. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 20 (05) 510-516
- 21 Barbosa RP, Pereira-Cenci T, Da Silva WM, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Demarco FF, Cenci MS. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ . J Dent 2012; 40 (05) 359-363
- 22 Rahim TNAT, Mohamad D, Md Akil H, Ab Rahman I. Water sorption characteristics of restorative dental composites immersed in acidic drinks. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (06) e63-e70
- 23 Alp CK, Gündogdu C, Ahısha CD. The effect of gastric acid on the surface properties of different universal composites: a SEM study. Scanning 2022; 2022: 1-10
- 24 Rizzante FAP, Bombonatti JSF, Vasconcelos L, Porto TS, Teich S, Mondelli RFL. Influence of resin-coating agents on the roughness and color of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2019; 122 (03) 332.e1-332.e5
- 25 Bhushan B. Surface roughness analysis and measurement techniques. In: Bhushan B. ed. Modern Tribology Handbook. Two Volume Set. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press; 2000: 79-150
- 26 Freitas F, Pinheiro de Melo T, Delgado AH. et al. Varying the polishing protocol influences the color stability and surface roughness of bulk-fill resin-based composites. J Funct Biomater 2021; 12: 1-12
- 27 PDF4PRO. Filtek™Z350XT Universal Restorative System. Technical profile of the product. . Accessed May 16, 2021 at: https://pdf4pro.com/view/filtek-z350-xt-technical-product-profile-350664.html
- 28 Moura P, Azevedo S, Dutra B, Vieira I, Alves G. Impact of a novel polishing method on the surface roughness and micromorphology of nanofilled and microhybrid composite resins. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia. MedicinaDentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial 2015; 56: 18-24
- 29 Lopes IAD, Monteiro PJVC, Mendes JJB, Gonçalves JMR, Caldeira FJF. The effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and gloss of two nanocomposites. Saudi Dent J 2018; 30: 197-207
- 30 Gehlot PM, Sudeep P, Manjunath V, Annapoorna BM, Prasada LK, Nandlal B. Influence of various desensitizing mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on surface roughness and microhardness of Tetric N-Ceram bulk-fill resin composite: an in vitro study and scanning electron microscope analysis. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (04) 820-827
- 31 Karatas O, Gul P, Gündoğdu M, Iskenderoglu DT. An evaluation of surface roughness after staining of different composite resins using atomic force microscopy and a profilometer. Microsc Res Tech 2020; 83: 1251-1259
- 32 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39 (02) 175-191
- 33 D'Ercole S, De Angelis F, Biferi V. et al. Antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of three resin-based dental composites against Streptococcus mutans . Materials (Basel) 2022; 15: 1891-1903
- 34 R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024
- 35 Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Ersöz B. Investigation of single shade composite resin surface roughness and color stability. Ataturk Univ Hekim Fak Derg 2021; 31 (02) 207-214
- 36 Fatima N, Hussain M. Effect of two different commonly available energy drinks on surface microhardness of tooth color restorative materials. J Reprod Dev 2014; 2: 269-276
- 37 Veloz JJ, Alvear M, Salazar LA. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity against Streptococcus mutans of individual and mixtures of the main polyphenolic compounds found in Chilean propolis. BioMed Res Int 2019; 7602343: 1-7
- 38 Saquib SA, AlQahtani NA, Ahmad I, Kader MA, Al Shahrani SS, Asiri EA. Evaluation and comparison of antibacterial efficacy of herbal extracts in combination with antibiotics on periodontal pathobionts: an in vitro microbiological study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2019; 8 (03) 89-101
- 39 Abzal MS, Rathakrishnan M, Prakash V, Vivekanandhan P, Subbiya A, Sukumaran VG. Evaluation of surface roughness of three different composite resins with three different polishing systems. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19 (02) 171-174
- 40 Gurgan S, Vural UK. Comparison of mechanical and optical properties of a newly marketed universal composite with contemporary universal composite resins: an in vitro study. Microsc Res Tech 2021; 85: 1171-1179
- 41 El-Rashidy AA, Shaalan O, Abdelraouf RM, Habib NA. Effect of immersion and thermocycling in different beverages on the surface roughness of single- and multi-shade resin composites. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23: 367-375
- 42 Guler S, Unal M. The evaluation of color and surface roughness changes in resin based restorative materials with different contents after waiting in various liquids: an SEM and AFM study. Microsc Res Tech 2018; 81: 1422-1433
- 43 Camilotti V, Mendonça MJ, Dobrovolski M, Detogni AC, Ambrosano GMB, De Goes MF. Impact of dietary acids on the surface roughness and morphology of composite resins. J Oral Sci 2021; 63 (01) 18-21
- 44 Camilotti V, Detogni AC, Gláucia MBA, Mendonça MJ, De Goes JKUF. Effect of acidic solutions present in the diet on the surface roughness of microhybrid composite resins. Research Society and Development. 2022; 11 (04) 42-54
- 45 Kumari CM, Bhat KM, Bansal R. Evaluation of surface roughness of different restorative composites after polishing using atomic force microscopy. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19 (01) 56-62
- 46 Pietrokovski Y, Zeituni D, Schwartz A, Beyth N. Comparison of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of resin composite. Materials (Basel) 2022; 15 (21) 7415-7425
- 47 Ismail HS, Ali AI. The effect of finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and microbial adhesion of bulk fill composites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Dent 2023; 20: 26-44
- 48 Vaidya N, Kumar P, Pathak K, Punia SK, Choudhary A, Patnana AK. Comparative evaluation of the influence of different sports/energy drinks and alcoholic beverages on the surface roughness of three different flowable esthetic restorative materials: an in vitro analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2020; 10 (05) 585-590
- 49 Değirmenci A, Değirmenci BU, Salameh A. Long-term effect of acidic beverages on dental injectable composite resin: microhardness, surface roughness, elastic modulus, and flexural strength patterns. Strength Mater 2022; 54: 331-343
- 50 Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu A, Garcia-Godoy F, Brambilla E. Surface properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: a review of the current literature. Am J Dent 2015; 28 (06) 311-320
- 51 Alshehri A, Alhalabi F, Mustafa M. et al. Effects of accelerated aging on color stability and surface roughness of a biomimetic composite: an in vitro study. Biomimetics (Basel) 2022; 7 (04) 158-169
- 52 Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC. et al. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J Dent 2017; 67: 43-52
- 53 Bilgili D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, Tayfun D, Özyurt ÖK. Surface properties and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins. J Dent 2020; 95: 103317
- 54 Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (01) 87-101
- 55 Yuan C, Wang X, Gao X, Chen F, Liang X, Li D. Effects of surface properties of polymer-based restorative materials on early adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in vitro . J Dent 2016; 54: 33-40
- 56 Ozan G, Eren MM, Vatansever C, Erdemir U. Effect of surface sealant on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composites. Polym Polymer Compos 2021; 29 (9, Suppl): S475-S484
- 57 Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Thongsroi T, Saesaw P, Pongpaiboon N, Saewong S. In vitro surface and color changes of tooth-colored restorative materials after sport and energy drink cyclic immersions. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22 (01) 578
- 58 Ishii R, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A. et al. Effects of finishing and polishing methods on the surface roughness and surface free energy of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent 2020; 45 (02) E91-E104
- 59 Somacal DC, Bellan MC, Monteiro MSG, Oliveira SD, Bittencourt HR, Spohr AM. Effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins. Braz Dent J 2022; 33 (06) 94-102
- 60 Kim K, Kim JN, Lim B-S, Ahn S-J. Urethane dimethacrylate influences the cariogenic properties of Streptococcus mutans . Materials (Basel) 2021; 14: 1015-1027
- 61 Dönmez N, Izzet BA, Topcuoglu N. Do the differences in organic contents of composite resins affect surface roughness and Streptococcus mutans adhesion?. J Adhes Sci Technol 2021; 36 (03) 1-17
- 62 Motevasselian F, Zibafar E, Yassini E, Mirzaei M, Pourmirhoseni N. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microhybrid and nanohybrid resin composites and dental amalgam: an in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran) 2017; 14 (06) 337-343
- 63 Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007; 26 (06) 915-923
- 64 Sengupta I, Ballal M, Mahesh S, Acharya S. Surface roughness and bacterial adhesion on composite materials: an in vitro comparative evaluation. Biomedicine (Taipei) 2023; 43: 1220-1225
- 65 Namazoglu B, Akosy M, Memis-özgul B, Tulga-Oz F. Anti-microbial efficiency of gaseous ozone's combined use with fluoride and chlorhexidine on time-related oral biofilm: an in situ study on pediatric patients. Med Gas Res 2023; 13 (04) 192-197