Bone Mineral Density Distribution in the Posterior Wall of the Lateral Mass Evaluated by Computed Tomography Osteoabsorptiometry

Abstract

Objective Cervical open-door laminoplasty using plates and miniscrews is gaining popularity. One of the complications of this procedure is the loosening or back-out of the miniscrews inserted in the lateral mass (LM). Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by computed tomography (CT) has been used as a predictor of bone strength. However, bone density distribution in the LM remains unclear.

Materials and Methods We investigated bone density distribution in the posterior wall of the LM. A total of 120 LMs were analyzed from the patients who underwent laminoplasty. The distribution of BMD defined by Hounsfield unit (HU) in the posterior wall of the LM was measured by CT osteoabsorptiometry. The posterior wall was divided into nine zones, which consisted of three columns (lateral, center, and medial) and three rows (cranial, center, and caudal). BMD in each zone was averaged and compared by zones and cervical levels.

Results Overall mean ± standard deviation BMD was 1,092 ± 433 HU. Averaged BMD in the entire posterior wall was highest at C4 (1,365 ± 459 HU), second highest at C3 (1,239 ± 435 HU), and lower in the lower levels. BMD in the medial–center zone (1,357 ± 443 HU) was the highest in all zones. BMD in the medial–caudal region at C7 was only 59% of the highest BMD in the medial–center region at C4.

Conclusion The medial–center to the cranial region was most suitable for miniscrew fixation for laminoplasty. These biomechanical findings would be useful in the preoperative planning of laminoplasty especially for the determination of the LM screw entry points and in the design of laminoplasty implants.

Keywords

bone mineral density - lateral mass - osteoabsorptiometry - screw loosening

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board of Shin Yurigaoka General Hospital approved this study (no. 20230227-2).

Publication History

Article published online:
19 November 2024

• References

• 1 Liu G, Buchowski JM, Riew KD. Screw back-out following “open-door” cervical laminoplasty: a review of 165 plates. Asian Spine J 2015; 9 (06) 849-854
• 2 Anderst WJ, Thorhauer ED, Lee JY, Donaldson WF, Kang JD. Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location. Spine J 2011; 11 (07) 659-667
• 3 Müller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp N, Schulte E, Wimmer B. Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical adaptation in individual joints. Skeletal Radiol 1989; 18 (07) 507-512
• 4 Pan CC, Simon P, Espinoza Orías AA. et al. Lumbar facet joint subchondral bone density in low back pain and asymptomatic subjects. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49 (04) 571-576
• 5 Hara T, Ohara Y, Abe E. et al. Cervical endplate bone density distribution measured by CT osteoabsorptiometry and direct comparison with mechanical properties of the endplate. Eur Spine J 2021; 30 (09) 2557-2564
• 6 Irie TY, Irie T, Espinoza Orías AA. et al. Three-dimensional distribution of CT attenuation in the lumbar spine pedicle wall. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 1709
• 7 Morishita Y, Hida S, Miyazaki M. et al. The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit on the kinematics of the cervical spine. Spine 2008; 33 (06) E178-E182
• 8 Kim MK, Cho HJ, Kwak DS, You SH. Characteristics of regional bone quality in cervical vertebrae considering BMD: determining a safe trajectory for cervical pedicle screw fixation. J Orthop Res 2018; 36 (01) 217-223
• 9 Briski DC, Goel VK, Waddell BS. et al. Does spanning a lateral lumbar interbody cage across the vertebral ring apophysis increase loads required for failure and mitigate endplate violation. Spine 2017; 42 (20) E1158-E1164
• 10 Segami K, Espinoza Orías AA, Miyamoto H, Kanzaki K, An HS, Inoue N. Regional distribution of computed tomography attenuation across the lumbar endplate. PLoS One 2021; 16 (10) e0259001
• 11 Zavras AG, Dandu N, Espinoza-Orias AA. et al. Computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry evaluation of cervical endplate subchondral bone mineral density. Global Spine J 2023; 13 (07) 1803-1811
• 12 Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K. Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2000; 25 (07) 858-864
• 13 Kuklo TR, Lehman Jr RA. Effect of various tapping diameters on insertion of thoracic pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 2003; 28 (18) 2066-2071
• 14 Kanematsu R, Hanakita J, Takahashi T, Minami M, Inoue T, Honda F. Risk factor analysis of facet fusion following cervical lateral mass screw fixation with a minimum 1-year follow-up: assessment of maximal insertional screw torque and incidence of loosening. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2021; 61 (01) 40-46
• 15 Heller JG, Estes BT, Zaouali M, Diop A. Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (09) 1315-1321
• 16 Hostin RA, Wu C, Perra JH, Polly DW, Akesen B, Wroblewski JM. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation. Spine 2008; 33 (22) 2415-2421
• 17 Heller JG, Silcox III DH, Sutterlin III CE. Complications of posterior cervical plating. Spine 1995; 20 (22) 2442-2448
• 18 Chahla J, Liu JN, Manderle B. et al. Bony ingrowth of coil-type open-architecture anchors compared with screw-type PEEK anchors for the medial row in rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy 2020; 36 (04) 952-961
• 19 Orías AAE, Sheha E, Zavras A. et al. CT osteoabsorptiometry assessment of subchondral bone density predicts intervertebral implant subsidence in a human ACDF cadaver model. Global Spine J 2023; 13 (05) 1374-1383