Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1793948
The Controversy Surrounding the Arcade of Struthers: A Systematic Review of Literature
Funding None.
Abstract
The arcade of Struthers was first described by Kane et al in 1973 as a thickening of the deep investing fascia of the distal arm and superficial fibers of the medial head of the triceps muscle extending to the medial intermuscular septum. However, existence of anatomical structure remains disputed, lacking a unanimous consensus. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of all findings and conclusions on this subject. A literature search was conducted using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. The QUality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies (QUACS) scale was used for quality appraisal. In total, 12 studies (including 348 arms) agreed with the existence of the arcade of Struthers and its role in ulnar nerve entrapment. One study agreed with the existence of the structure, but disagreed with its nomenclature. On the other side, five studies (describing 224 arms) were against the existence of the structure. In literature, studies can be divided into two groups. The first group agrees with the existence of the arcade of Struthers as described by Kane et al in 1973, emphasizing its role in ulnar nerve entrapment. The second group disagrees with the existence of the arcade of Struthers, and is further divided into those who believe the structure is best described as an accessory origin of the head of the triceps muscle and those who consider it a dissection artifact.
Authors' Contributions
All the authors approved the final contents of the submission and were actively involved in the planning and enactment of the study and in the preparation of the submitted article.
Publication History
Article published online:
03 December 2024
© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Tiyaworanan P, Jianmongkol S, Thammaroj T. Anatomical study of arcade of Struthers. Hand Surg 2010; 15 (03) 157-159
- 2 Bartels RH, Grotenhuis JA, Kauer JM. The arcade of Struthers: an anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003; 145 (04) 295-300 , discussion 300
- 3 Wilke J, Krause F, Niederer D. et al. Appraising the methodological quality of cadaveric studies: validation of the QUACS scale. J Anat 2015; 226 (05) 440-446
- 4 Zhong S, Zhong Z, Yu Y. et al. Ultrasonic observation and clinical application of arcade of Struthers in the mid-arm. World Neurosurg 2016; 91: 560-566.e1
- 5 Tubbs RS, Deep A, Shoja MM, Mortazavi MM, Loukas M, Cohen-Gadol AA. The arcade of Struthers: an anatomical study with potential neurosurgical significance. Surg Neurol Int 2011; 2: 184
- 6 Caetano EB, Sabongi Neto JJ, Vieira LA, Caetano MF. The arcade of Struthers: an anatomical study and clinical implications. Rev Bras Ortop 2017; 52 (03) 331-336
- 7 Gabel GT, Amadio PC. Reoperation for failed decompression of the ulnar nerve in the region of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72 (02) 213-219
- 8 Amadio PC. Anatomical basis for a technique of ulnar nerve transposition. Surg Radiol Anat 1986; 8 (03) 155-161
- 9 Siqueira MG, Martins RS. The controversial arcade of Struthers. Surg Neurol 2005; 64 (Suppl. 01) S1 , 17–20, discussion S1, 20–21
- 10 al-Qattan MM, Murray KA. The arcade of Struthers: an anatomical study. J Hand Surg [Br] 1991; 16 (03) 311-314
- 11 Gonzalez MH, Lotfi P, Bendre A, Mandelbroyt Y, Lieska N. The ulnar nerve at the elbow and its local branching: an anatomic study. J Hand Surg [Br] 2001; 26 (02) 142-144
- 12 Kane E, Kaplan EB, Spinner M. Observations of the course of the ulnar nerve in the arm. Ann Chir 1973; 27 (05) 487-496
- 13 Novak CB, Mehdian H, von Schroeder HP. Laxity of the ulnar nerve during elbow flexion and extension. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (06) 1163-1167
- 14 von Schroeder HP, Scheker LR. Redefining the “arcade of Struthers.”. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (06) 1018-1021
- 15 Bain GI, Bajhau A. Endoscopic release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow using the Agee device: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (06) 691-695
- 16 Dellon AL. Musculotendinous variations about the medial humeral epicondyle. J Hand Surg [Br] 1986; 11 (02) 175-181
- 17 Guidi M, Neuhaus V, Scarsi B, Calcagni M, Prescher A, Ciritsis BD. The debatable arcade of Struthers: is it still time to consider it?. Eur J Anat 2019; 23 (04) 301-305
- 18 Mirza A, Mirza JB, Lee BK, Adhya S, Litwa J, Lorenzana DJ. An anatomical basis for endoscopic cubital tunnel release and associated clinical outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (07) 1363-1369
- 19 Wehrli L, Oberlin C. The internal brachial ligament versus the arcade of Struthers: an anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (02) 471-477
- 20 Poujade T, Hanouz N, Lecoq B, Hulet C, Collon S. Ultrasound-guided surgical treatment for ulnar nerve entrapment: a cadaver study. Chir Main 2014; 33 (04) 256-262
- 21 Staples JR, Calfee R. Cubital tunnel syndrome: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (10) e215-e224
- 22 De Jesus R, Dellon AL. Historic origin of the “arcade of Struthers.”. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (03) 528-531
- 23 Robertson C, Saratsiotis J. A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005; 28 (05) 345
- 24 Spinner M, Kaplan EB. The relationship of the ulnar nerve to the medial intermuscular septum in the arm and its clinical significance. Hand 1976; 8 (3) 239-242
- 25 Spinner M. Injuries to the Major Branches of the Peripheral Nerves of the Forearm. 2nd ed.. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1978: 234-335