Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Brazilian Journal of Oncology 2019; 15
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1797788
E-PÔSTER
TEMÁRIO: TUMORES COLORETAIS E CANAL ANAL

EVALUATION OF SELF-REFERRED QUALITY OF LIFE BEFORE THE TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA IN A CITY FROM WESTERN SANTA CATARINA: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Matheus Pelinski da Silveira
1   Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
,
João Paulo Dal Magro Mocellin
1   Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
,
Sarah Franco Vieira de Oliveira Maciel
1   Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
,
Andréia Machado Cardoso
1   Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
› Institutsangaben

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is defined as malignant neoplasms localized at the colon, rectum and large intestine. It is the third most frequent cancer in the world and the second in number of deaths. Objective: To analyze quality of life parameters in patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma histologic subtype of CRC. Methods: selection of participants with adenocarcinoma subtype CRC, without previous treatment for the neoplasia, from 18 to 70 years, with the application of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaires after signature of the Informed Consent Form. The quality of life score is calculated with the Microsoft Excel 2010 software, following scoring procedures of the questionnaires. Results: 14 people preliminarily participated in the study, 7 men and 7 women. The mean (M) of age of the patients is 59 years, standard deviation (SD) is 11,11 years. The 30 questions from the C30 questionnaire were split into 3 scales (functional (FS), symptoms (SS) and global quality of life (QL)), while the 29 questions from the CR29 were split into functional scale (FS) and symptoms scale (SS). The score was calculated and varies from 0 to 100. To FS and QL, the performance of the patient is better if the score is high. About SS, when it gets closer to 0, means that the patient has fewer symptoms from the CRC. The scores were calculated in general form and by sex, M from women (MW) and SD from women (SDW), M from men (MM) and SD from men (SDM). In the C30 questionnaire, for FS, M was 69.83 and SD was 19.36 (MW= 68.24 and SDW=17.43; MM=71.42 and SDM=22.42). For SS, M was 32.73 and SD was 22.43 (MW=29.75 and SDM=18,68). For QL, M was 61.90 and SD was 25.88 (MW=67.85, SDW=21.74; MM=55.94, SDM=29.93). In the CR29 questionnaire, for FS, M was 55.76 and SD was 17.67 (MW=59.93, SDW=6.21; MM=51.59; SDM=17.49). For SS, M was 26.94 and SD=11.66 (MW=20.40, SDW=14.39; MM=33.48, SDM=7.91) Conclusion: For FS, patients in general present values near the reference value, with a small difference between men and women. About SS, some values are close to the reference values, while others present above or below the reference in some categories, showing that some symptoms are more or less referred. Factors like CRC staging, age mean and comorbidities may be responsible for the differences. For QL, the values are close to the reference; however, there is a significant difference between self-perception of health in women and men (smaller for men).



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Oktober 2019

© 2019. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

Bibliographical Record
Matheus Pelinski da Silveira, João Paulo Dal Magro Mocellin, Sarah Franco Vieira de Oliveira Maciel, Andréia Machado Cardoso. EVALUATION OF SELF-REFERRED QUALITY OF LIFE BEFORE THE TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA IN A CITY FROM WESTERN SANTA CATARINA: PRELIMINARY RESULTS. Brazilian Journal of Oncology 2019; 15.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1797788