Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2024; 33(01): 196-209
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800744
Section 8: Human Factors and Organizational Issues
Survey

Human Factors and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics: Review of Recent Developments and Advances

Andre Kushniruk
1   School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
,
David Kaufman
2   Health Informatics, School of Health Professions, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: In this paper we focus on a review of key articles published in the past two years (2022 and 2023) in the areas of human factors and organizational issues in health informatics.

Methods: We reviewed manuscripts that were published in primary human factors, human factors engineering and health informatics journals. This involved conducting a series of searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles related to human factors in healthcare published in 2022 and 2023.

Results: The range of applications that have been designed and analyzed using human factors approaches has been rapidly expanding, including increased number of articles around topics such as the following: AI in healthcare, patient-centered design, usability of mHealth, organizational issues, and work around ensuring system safety. This includes study of applications designed for use by both patients and health providers applying both qualitative and quantitative approaches to user requirements, user-centered system design and human factors analysis and evaluation.

Conclusion: The importance of human factors is becoming recognized as new forms of health technology appear. A multi-level perspective on human factors, that considers human factors at multiple levels, from the individual user to the complex social and organizational context, was described to consider the range and diversity of human factors approaches in healthcare. Such an approach will be needed to drive the design and evaluation of useful and usable healthcare information technologies.



Publication History

Article published online:
08 April 2025

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Bailey CR, Shorrock S, Fong K. Human factors and ergonomics. MA Healthcare London; 2023. p. 1-4. doi:10.12968/hmed.2023.0142.
  • 2 Keebler JR RM, Sittig DF, Thomas E, Salas E. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare: Industry Demands and a Path Forward. Hum Factors. 2022;64(1):250-8.doi:10.1177/00187208211073623
  • 3 Kushniruk AW, Borycki EM. Human factors in healthcare IT: Management considerations and trends. Healthcare Management Forum. 2023;36(2):72-8. doi:10.1177/08404704221139219
  • 4 Sujan M PR, Salmon P. Eight human factors and ergonomics principles for healthcare artificial intelligence. BMJ Health & Care Informatics. 2022;29(1) 9:e100516. doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100516
  • 5 Saab MM MM, O'Mahony B, Cooke E, Hegarty J, Murphy D, Walshe N, Noonan B. Virtual Reality Simulation in Nursing and Midwifery Education: A Usability Study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2023;41(10):815-24. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001010
  • 6 Verkuyl M TK, Job T, O'Keefe-McCarthy S, Atthill S, Goldsworthy S, Atack L. An educator's toolkit for virtual simulation: A usability study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;119:105600. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105600
  • 7 Currie H, Harvey A, Bond R, Magee J, Finlay D. Remote synchronous usability testing of public access defibrillators during social distancing in a pandemic. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):14575. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18873-7
  • 8 Ossowska A KA, Świetlik D. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry-Narrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3449. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063449
  • 9 You Y LX, Pan Y, Zheng H, Vera J, Liu S, Deng S, Zhang L. Artificial intelligence in cancer target identification and drug discovery. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):156. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00994-0
  • 10 Yousif M vDP, Laurinavicius A, Rimm D, van der Laak J, Madabhushi A, Schnitt S, Pantanowitz L. Artificial intelligence applied to breast pathology. Virchows Arch. 2022;480(1):191-209. doi:10.1007/s00428-021-03213-3
  • 11 Shortliffe EH SM, Patel VL. Framework for the Evaluation of Clinical AI Systems. Intelligent Systems in Medicine and Health: The Role of AI: Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 479-503. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09108-7_17
  • 12 Scott P KC, Zhu X, Nøhr C, Ammenwerth E, Kukhareva P, Peute L, Marcilly R. One Health: Insights from Organizational & Social, Technology Assessment and Human Factors Perspectives. Yearbook of medical informatics. 2023;32(01):076-83. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1768729
  • 13 Kuziemsky C. The Role of Human and Organizational Factors in the Pursuit of One Digital Health. Yearb Med Inform. 2023;32(1):201-9. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1768724
  • 14 Carayon P, Hundt AS, Karsh B, Gurses AP, Alvarado C, Smith M, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2006;15(suppl 1):i50-i8. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015842
  • 15 Jakob R HS, Rudolf AM, Fleisch E, Haug S, Mair JL, Salamanca-Sanabria A, Kowatsch T. Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(5):e35371. doi:10.2196/35371
  • 16 Deniz-Garcia A, Fabelo H, Rodriguez-Almeida AJ, Zamora-Zamorano G, Castro-Fernandez M, Alberiche Ruano MdP, et al. Quality, usability, and effectiveness of mHealth apps and the role of artificial intelligence: current scenario and challenges. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023;25:e44030. doi:10.2196/44030
  • 17 Zoellner J RA, Porter K, Frederick C, Hilgart M, Ritterband L. Development of a Digital Behavioral Intervention to Reduce the Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Among Rural Appalachian Adults: Multiphased, Human-Centered Design Approach. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e41262. doi:10.2196/41262
  • 18 Nyberg A SA, Lundell S, Marklund S, Tistad M, Wadell K. Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e43269. doi:10.2196/43269
  • 19 van der Meijden SL dHA, Thoral PJ, Steyerberg EW, Kant IM, Cinà G, Arbous MS. Intensive Care Unit Physicians' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study. JMIR human factors. 2023; 5;10:e39114. doi:10.2196/39114
  • 20 Lääveri T VJ. Physicians' Perspectives on EHR Usability: Results from Four Large Cross-Sectional Surveys from 2010 to 2021. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023;304:16-20. doi:10.3233/SHTI230360
  • 21 Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW, editors. Health technology, quality and safety in a learning health system. Healthcare management forum; 2023: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. doi:10.1177/08404704221139383
  • 22 Sittig DF YE, Singh H. Five Strategies for a Safer EHR Modernization Journey. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38(Suppl 4):940-2. doi:10.1007/s11606-023-08331-z
  • 23 Ramer S. Site-ation pearl growing: methods and librarianship history and theory. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(3):397-400.
  • 24 Gilbert RM. Reimagining digital healthcare with a patient-centric approach: the role of user experience (UX) research. Frontiers in Digital Health. 2022;4:899976. doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.899976
  • 25 Ammenwerth E, Wilk S, Huang Z. Personalization in mHealth: Innovative informatics methods to improve patient experience and health outcome. Elsevier; 2023. p. 104523. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104523
  • 26 Kayser L KA, Duminski E, Jakobsen S, Terp R, Dansholm S, Roeder M, From G. Health Professionals' eHealth Literacy and System Experience Before and 3 Months After the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System: Longitudinal Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(2):e29780. doi:10.2196/29780
  • 27 Cheng L SY. Using Clinical Data Visualizations in Electronic Health Record User Interfaces to Enhance Medical Student Diagnostic Reasoning: Randomized Experiment. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023;10:e38941. doi:10.2196/38941
  • 28 Dixit RA, Boxley CL, Samuel S, Mohan V, Ratwani RM, Gold JA. Electronic health record use issues and diagnostic error: a scoping review and framework. Journal of patient safety. 2023;19(1):e25-e30. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001081
  • 29 Hägglund M, Scandurra I. Usability of the Swedish accessible electronic health record: qualitative survey study. JMIR human factors. 2022;9(2):e37192. doi:10.2196/37192
  • 30 Awad S, Amon K, Baillie A, Loveday T, Baysari MT. Human factors and safety analysis methods used in the design and redesign of electronic medication management systems: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2023;172:105017. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105017
  • 31 Lomax S SJ, Catchpole K. Implementing human factors in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(7):916-7. doi:10.1111/anae.16006
  • 32 Gaughan MR, Kwon M, Park E, Jungquist C. Nurses' experience and perception of technology use in practice: a qualitative study using an extended technology acceptance model. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2022;40(7):478-86. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000850
  • 33 Baratta LR, Harford D, Sinsky CA, Kannampallil T, Lou SS. Characterizing the Patterns of Electronic Health Record–Integrated Secure Messaging Use: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2023;25:e48583. doi:10.2196/48583
  • 34 Rouleau G RC, Ivers N, Desveaux L. Characterizing the gaps between best-practice implementation strategies and real-world implementation: qualitative study among family physicians who engaged with audit and feedback reports. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10(1):e38736. doi:10.2196/38736
  • 35 Ogunsanya ME SM, Bamidele OO, Ezenwankwo EF, Clifton S, Ton C, Knight JM, Odedina FT, Greer JA, Dwyer K, Kendzor DE. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions in prostate cancer survivorship: a scoping review. J Cancer Surviv. 2023;17(3):557-68. doi:10.1007/s11764-022-01328-3
  • 36 Engelsma T, Jaspers M, Peute L. Enhancing Inclusive mHealth Design for People Living with Dementia: Examples from Literature. Caring is Sharing–Exploiting the Value in Data for Health and Innovation. 2023:646-50. doi:10.3233/SHTI230228
  • 37 Addotey-Delove M, Scott RE, Mars M. Healthcare workers' perspectives of mHealth adoption factors in the developing world: scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(2):1244. doi:10.3390/ijerph20021244
  • 38 Bounds DT, Stiles-Shields C, Schueller SM, Odgers CL, Karnik NS. Ethical considerations for developing pediatric mhealth interventions for teens with socially complex needs. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing. 2023;36(1):7-16. doi:10.1111/jcap.12396
  • 39 Siebert JN GL, Sauvage M, Bloudeau L, Suppan L, Rodieux F, Haddad K, Hugon F, Gervaix A, Lovis C, Combescure C, Manzano S, Ehrler F, Group PT, Group PP. Usability Testing and Technology Acceptance of an mHealth App at the Point of Care During Simulated Pediatric In- and Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations: Study Nested Within 2 Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022;9(1):e35399. doi:10.2196/35399
  • 40 Liu D LQ, Han S. Using Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Assess the Adopt Intention of a Proposed IoT-Based Health Management Tool. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(16):6092. doi:10.3390/s22166092
  • 41 Kulkarni PA SH. Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Diagnosis: Opportunities, Challenges, and Hype. JAMA. 2023;330(4):317-8. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.11440
  • 42 Ismatullaev UVU, Kim S-H. Review of the factors affecting acceptance of AI-infused systems. Human Factors. 2024;66(1):126-44. doi:10.1177/00187208211064707
  • 43 Nov O SN, Mann D. Putting ChatGPT's medical advice to the (Turing) test: survey study. JMIR Medical Education. 2023;9:e46939. doi:10.2196/46939
  • 44 D'Angelo T, Caudo D, Blandino A, Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Gruenewald LD, et al. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in musculoskeletal imaging: current applications. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2022;50(9):1414-31. doi:10.1002/jcu.23321
  • 45 Yoo HJ KJ, Kim S, Jang SM, Lee H. Development and usability evaluation of a bedside robot system for inpatients. Technol Health Care. 2022;30(2):337-50. doi:10.3233/THC-212901
  • 46 Rogers WA KT, Bayles MA. Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human-Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults. Hum Factors. 2022;64(3):441-50. doi:10.1177/00187208211037465
  • 47 Ragno L BA, Vannetti F, Amici C, Cusano N. Application of Social Robots in Healthcare: Review on Characteristics, Requirements, Technical Solutions. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23(15):6820. doi:10.3390/s23156820
  • 48 Almasi S, Bahaadinbeigy K, Ahmadi H, Sohrabei S, Rabiei R. Usability evaluation of dashboards: A systematic literature review of tools. BioMed Research International. 2023;2023(1):9990933. doi:10.1155/2023/9990933
  • 49 Tabone W dWJ. Using ChatGPT for human-computer interaction research: a primer. R Soc Open Sci. 2023;10(9):231053. doi:10.1098/rsos.231053
  • 50 Menon D SK. “Chatting with ChatGPT”: Analyzing the factors influencing users' intention to Use the Open AI's ChatGPT using the UTAUT model. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e20962. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20962
  • 51 Kamińska D ZG, Laska-Leśniewicz A. Usability Testing of Virtual Reality Applications-The Pilot Study. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(4):1342. doi:10.3390/s22041342
  • 52 Fussell SG, Truong D. Using virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extended technology acceptance model. Virtual Reality. 2022;26(1):249-67. doi:10.1007/s10055-021-00554-x
  • 53 Rodrigues P EA, Botelho J, Machado V, Zagalo C, Zorzal ER, Mendes JJ, Lopes DS. Usability, acceptance, and educational usefulness study of a new haptic operative dentistry virtual reality simulator. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022; 2021: 106831. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106831
  • 54 Colombo V, Aliverti A, Sacco M. Virtual reality for COPD rehabilitation: a technological perspective. Pulmonology. 2022;28(2):119-33. doi:10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.11.010
  • 55 Bui DT, Barnett T, Hoang H, Chinthammit W. Usability of augmented reality technology in tele-mentorship for managing clinical scenarios—A study protocol. Plos One. 2022;17(3):e0266255. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266255
  • 56 Shen J KC, Samora J, Leonard J, Li R, Shi J, Yeates KO, Xiang H, Taylor HG. Usability and validity of a virtual reality cognitive assessment tool for pediatric traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2022;67(4):587-96. doi:10.1037/rep0000464
  • 57 Johansen SK KA, Haseli K, Stenmo VH, Thomsen JL, Rathleff MS. Exploring user visions for modeling mHealth apps toward supporting patient-parent-clinician collaboration and shared decision-making when treating adolescent knee pain in general practice: workshop study. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10(1):e44462. doi:10.2196/44462
  • 58 Davat A, Martin-Juchat F. Patients' information needs related to a monitoring implant for heart failure: co-designed study based on affect stories. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e38096. doi:10.2196/38096
  • 59 Stringer E LJ, Livergant J, Kushniruk AW. Decision Aids for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: Qualitative Elicitation of Design Recommendations From Patient End Users. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e43551. doi:10.2196/43551
  • 60 Kim JC SS, Åhlund C. Acceptability of a Health Care App With 3 User Interfaces for Older Adults and Their Caregivers: Design and Evaluation Study. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10(1):e42145. doi:10.2196/42145
  • 61 Denecke K, May R, Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW. Digital health as an enabler for hospital@ home: A rising trend or just a vision? Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1137798. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137798
  • 62 Kekkonen M KE, Laitinen J, Oinas-Kukkonen H. Factors Reducing the Use of a Persuasive mHealth App and How to Mitigate Them: Thematic Analysis. JMIR Human Factors. 2023; 10:e40579. doi:10.2196/40579
  • 63 Lundstedt R PJ, Håkansson C, Frennert S, Wallergård M. Designing virtual natural environments for older adults: think-aloud study. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10(1):e40932. doi:10.2196/40932
  • 64 Kumar S V-CA, Melchinger H, O'Connor KD, Psotka M, Desai NR, Ahmad T, Wilson FP. Wearables in Cardiovascular Disease. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023;16(3):557-68. doi:10.1007/s12265-022-10314-0
  • 65 Lee MA SM, Bessette H, Roberts Davis M, Tyner TE, Reid A. Use of wearables for monitoring cardiometabolic health: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2023;179:105218. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105218
  • 66 González Ramírez ML, García Vázquez JP, Rodríguez MD, Padilla-López LA, Galindo-Aldana GM, Cuevas-González D, editors. Wearables for Stress Management: A Scoping Review. Healthcare; 2023: MDPI. doi:10.3390/healthcare11172369
  • 67 Monkman H GJ, MacDonald L, Lesselroth B. Consumers' Needs for Laboratory Results Portals: Questionnaire Study. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e42843. doi:10.2196/42843
  • 68 Poot CC ME, Fokkema M, Chavannes NH, Osborne RH, Kayser L. Translation, cultural adaptation and validity assessment of the Dutch version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire: a mixed-method approach. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1006. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15869-4
  • 69 Chen J, Wang T, Fang Z, Wang H. Research on elderly users' intentions to accept wearable devices based on the improved UTAUT model. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;10:1035398. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035398.
  • 70 Deshpande N AV, Vollbrecht H, Meltzer DO, Press V. eHealth literacy and patient portal use and attitudes: cross-sectional observational study. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e40105.
  • 71 Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW, Oluka H, Minshall S, Cato K, Senathirajah Y, et al. Modelling information needs and sources in a COVID-19 designated hospital. Caring is Sharing–Exploiting the Value in Data for Health and Innovation: IOS Press; 2023. p. 881-5. doi:10.3233/SHTI230294
  • 72 Kaufman DR SY, Cato K, Kushniruk A, Borycki E, Minshal S, Roblin P, Daniel P. Navigating Infection Control Processes in a COVID-19 Only Safety-Net Hospital at the Height of the Pandemic. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023;304:67-71. doi:10.3233/SHTI230371
  • 73 Senathirajah Y KD, Borycki E, Kushniruk A, Cato K. Comparing Responses to COVID-19 Across Institutions: Conceptualization of an Emergency Response Maturity Model. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023;302:907-8. doi:10.3233/SHTI230304
  • 74 Thiveaud D OD, Ollé F, Camus D, Josseran A, Degon PF, Ferracci C, Fraysse JL, Germe AF, Grumblat A, Guido-Morin P, Jarraya B, Joly AS, Lanier C, Pelayo S, Racle G, Teyssie M. Why and how can we improve patient and caregiver information for the proper use of their medical devices throughout the care pathway? Therapie. 2023;78(1):53-65. doi:10.1016/j.therap.2022.11.002
  • 75 Wark K CK, Wolter E, Avey JP. Engaging stakeholders in integrating social determinants of health into electronic health records: a scoping review. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2021;80(1):1943983. doi:10.1080/22423982.2021.1943983
  • 76 Viitanen J TM, Tynkkynen E, Lääveri T. Usability of information systems: Experiences of outpatient physicians, outpatient nurses, and open care social welfare professionals from three large cross-sectional surveys in Finland. Int J Med Inform. 2022;165:104836. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104836.
  • 77 Marcilly R CJ, Robert L, Pelayo S, Beuscart JB, Rousselière C, Décaudin B. Improving the usability and usefulness of computerized decision support systems for medication review by clinical pharmacists: A convergent, parallel evaluation. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2023;19(1):144-54. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.08.012
  • 78 Hietbrink EA, Middelweerd A, van Empelen P, Preuhs K, Konijnendijk AA, Nijeweme-d'Hollosy WO, et al. A digital lifestyle coach (E-Supporter 1.0) to support people with type 2 diabetes: participatory development study. JMIR human factors. 2023;10(1):e40017. doi:10.2196/40017
  • 79 Wegener EK BJ, Whitmore C, Winters M, Kayser L. Involving Older People With Frailty or Impairment in the Design Process of Digital Health Technologies to Enable Aging in Place: Scoping Review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023;10:e37785. doi:10.2196/37785
  • 80 Jones EK HG, Schmoke K, Ninkovic I, Dodge S, Bahr M, Melton GB, Marquard J, Tignanelli CJ. Combined Expert and User-Driven Usability Assessment of Trauma Decision Support Systems Improves User-Centered Design. Surgery. 2022;172(5):1537-48. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.037
  • 81 Marcilly R ZW, Quindroit P, Pelayo S, Berdot S, Charpiat B, Corny J, Drouot S, Frery P, Leguelinel-Blache G, Mondet L, Potier A, Robert L, Ferret L, Baysari M. Comparison of the validity, perceived usefulness, and usability of I-MeDeSA and TEMAS, two tools to evaluate alert system usability. Int J Med Inform. 2023;175:105091. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105091
  • 82 Li Y PH, Law AV, Baskys A, Roosan D. Gamification to Improve Medication Adherence: A Mixed-method Usability Study for MedScrab. J Med Syst. 2023;47(1):108. doi:10.1007/s10916-023-02006-2
  • 83 Sinabell I AE. Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation. Appl Clin Inform. 2022;13(1):67-79. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1740919
  • 84 Abukhadijah HJ, Turk-Adawi KI, Dewart N, Grace SL. Qualitative study measuring the usability of the international cardiac rehabilitation registry. BMJ open. 2022;12(8):e064255. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064255
  • 85 Mason M CY, Rayo J, Gong Y, Harris M, Jiang Y. Technologies for Medication Adherence Monitoring and Technology Assessment Criteria: Narrative Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(3):e35157. doi:10.2196/35157
  • 86 Foraker R, Phommasathit C, Clevenger K, Lee C, Boateng J, Shareef N, et al. Using the sociotechnical model to conduct a focused usability assessment of a breast reconstruction decision tool. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2023;23(1):140. doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02236-x
  • 87 Cheah W-H, Jusoh NM, Aung MMT, Ab Ghani A, Rebuan HMA. Mobile technology in medicine: development and validation of an adapted system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire and modified technology acceptance model (TAM) to evaluate user experience and acceptability of a mobile application in MRI safety screening. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 2023;33(01):036-45. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1758198
  • 88 Seinsche J dBE, Saibene E, Rizzo F, Carpinella I, Ferrarin M, Moza S, Ritter T, Giannouli E. A Newly Developed Exergame-Based Telerehabilitation System for Older Adults: Usability and Technology Acceptance Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023;10:e48845. doi:10.2196/48845
  • 89 Mishra A B-EL, Gala P, Stachofsky J. Factors influencing actual usage of fitness tracking devices: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Health Mark Q. 2023;40(1):19-38. doi:10.1080/07359683.2021.1994170
  • 90 VanDeWiele MD HA, Evans MD, O'Connell MS, Flynn PM. Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to predict the behavioral intent of teledentistry utilization amongst United States adults. J Telemed Telecare. 2023:1357633X231182405.
  • 91 Chen Y-C, Cheng C, Osborne RH, Kayser L, Liu C-Y, Chang L-C. Validity testing and cultural adaptation of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) among people with chronic diseases in Taiwan: mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2022;24(1):e32855. doi:10.2196/32855
  • 92 Araújo I GA, Silva C. Portuguese Validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Scale (UTAUT) to a COVID-19 Mobile Application: A Pilot Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(13). doi:10.3390/healthcare11131916
  • 93 Stoumpos AI KF, Talias MA. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4). doi:10.3390/ijerph20043407
  • 94 Hutchins E. The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. Roots of human sociality: Routledge; 2020. p. 375-98. doi:10.4324/9781003135517-19
  • 95 Wilson E DM, Rao A, Torre D, Durning S, Anderson C, Goldhaber NH, Townsend W, Seifert CM. A scoping review of distributed cognition in acute care clinical decision-making. Diagnosis (Berl). 2022;10(2):68-88. doi:10.1515/dx-2022-0095
  • 96 Boyle JG, Walters MR, Jamieson S, Durning SJ. Distributed cognition: Theoretical insights and practical applications to health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 159. Medical Teacher. 2023;45(12):1323-33. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2023.2190479
  • 97 Beales D, Ho YK, Lewin J, Loh BW-Q, Yusof AB, Grieve S, et al. Participatory design of an infographic to help support the care of people living with complex regional pain syndrome. British Journal of Pain. 2023;17(6):519-31. doi:10.1177/20494637231190587
  • 98 Roper A SJ. Innovation through participatory design: Collaborative qualitative methods in the development of speech-language pathology technology. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022;24(5):527-32. doi:10.1080/17549507.2022.2050943
  • 99 Lou SS LH, Warner BC, Harford D, Lu C, Kannampallil T. Predicting physician burnout using clinical activity logs: model performance and lessons learned. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2022;127:104015. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104015
  • 100 Bartek B, Lou SS, Kannampallil T. Measuring the cognitive effort associated with task switching in routine EHR-based tasks. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2023;141:104349. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104349
  • 101 Li-Wang J TA, Katta R. Cognitive Ergonomics: A Review of Interventions for Outpatient Practice. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e44258. doi:10.7759/cureus.44258
  • 102 Rego C ME. The Impact of Feedback Modalities and the Influence of Cognitive Load on Interpersonal Communication in Nonclinical Settings: Experimental Study Design. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023;10:e49675. doi:10.2196/49675.
  • 103 Hallgren KA, Duncan MH, Iles-Shih MD, Cohn EB, McCabe CJ, Chang YM, et al. Feasibility, engagement, and usability of a remote, smartphone-based contingency management program as a treatment add-on for patients who use methamphetamine: Single-arm pilot study. JMIR Formative Research. 2023;7(1):e47516. doi:10.2196/47516
  • 104 Tukur M SG, AlShagathrh FM, Househ M, Agus M. Telehealth interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of applications, challenges, privacy and security issues. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023;30(1):e100676. doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100676
  • 105 Shin HR US, Yoon HJ, Choi EY, Shin WC, Lee HY, Kim YS. Comprehensive Senior Technology Acceptance Model of Daily Living Assistive Technology for Older Adults With Frailty: Cross-sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e41935.doi:10.2196/41935
  • 106 Ong E FD, Kuliga S, Layton N, Liddle J. Creating a consumer-driven global community of practice to support action within environmental design with people living with dementia: assistive technology challenges and opportunities. Brain Impair. 2023;24(2):219-28. doi:10.1017/BrImp.2023.4
  • 107 Yousaf W UA, Shirazi SH, Fayaz M, Assam M, Khan JA, Rasheed A, Mehmood G. Telehealth for COVID-19: A Conceptual Framework. J Healthc Eng. 2023:3679829. doi:10.1155/2023/3679829
  • 108 MacPherson M. Immigrant, Refugee, and Indigenous Canadians' Experiences With Virtual Health Care Services: Rapid Review. JMIR Human Factors. 2023;10:e47288. doi:10.2196/47288
  • 109 Apathy NC, Dixit RA, Boxley CL, Adams KT, Booker E, Ratwani RM. Variations in physician telemedicine provision. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(7):e2321955-e. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21955
  • 110 Beheshti L, Kalankesh LR, Doshmangir L, Farahbakhsh M. Telehealth in primary health care: a scoping review of the literature. Perspectives in health information management. 2022;19(1).
  • 111 Tong Q WW, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Wang D. Survey on Hand-Based Haptic Interaction for Virtual Reality. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2023;16(2):154-70. doi:10.1109/TOH.2023.3266199
  • 112 Flores Ramones A, del-Rio-Guerra MS. Recent developments in haptic devices designed for hearing-impaired people: A literature review. Sensors. 2023;23(6):2968. doi:10.3390/s23062968
  • 113 van Wegen M HJ, Adelsberger R, Pastore-Wapp M, van Wegen EEH, Bohlhalter S, Nef T, Krack P, Vanbellingen T. An Overview of Wearable Haptic Technologies and Their Performance in Virtual Object Exploration. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23(3):1563. doi:10.3390/s23031563
  • 114 Hambly P. Human factors and medication safety. anaesthesia. 2023;78(7). doi:10.1111/anae.16014
  • 115 Marquard J. Human factors and organizational issues in health informatics: Innovations and opportunities. Yearbook of medical informatics. 2021;30(01):091-9. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1726511
  • 116 Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
  • 117 Henriksen K, Dayton E, Keyes MA, Carayon P, Hughes R. Understanding adverse events: a human factors framework. Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. 2008.
  • 118 Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, Hinder S, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of medical Internet research. 2017;19(11):e8775. doi:10.2196/jmir.8775
  • 119 Winter PD CT. Using the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework to identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of digital twins in cardiovascular medicine. Sensors. 2023;23(14):6333. doi:10.3390/s23146333
  • 120 Liverani M IP, Perel P, Khan M, Balabanova D, Wiseman V. Assessing the potential of wearable health monitors for health system strengthening in low-and middle-income countries: a prospective study of technology adoption in Cambodia. Health policy and planning. 2022;37(8):943-51. doi:10.1093/heapol/czac019
  • 121 Pat JJ PC, Steffens MG, Witte LP, Blanker MH. Development and feasibility of a telemedicine tool for patients with recurrent urinary tract infection: myRUTIcoach. International urogynecology journal. 2023;34(11):2817-25. doi:10.1007/s00192-023-05634-x
  • 122 Carayon P. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety: CRC press; 2006. doi:10.1201/9781482269505
  • 123 Carayon P, Smith MJ. Work organization and ergonomics. Applied ergonomics. 2000;31(6):649-62. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00040-5
  • 124 Wooldridge AR CP, Hundt AS, Hoonakker PL. SEIPS-based process modeling in primary care. Applied ergonomics. 2017;60:240-54. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.010
  • 125 Holden RJ CP, Gurses AP, Hoonakker P, Hundt AS, Ozok AA, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ. SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669-86. doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.838643
  • 126 Boet S, Burns JK, Brehaut J, Britton M, Grantcharov T, Grimshaw J, et al. Analyzing interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: An exploratory observational study using conventional and alternative approaches. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2023;37(5):715-24. doi:10.1080/13561820.2023.2171373
  • 127 Xie A SH, Daodu O, Alam L, Sultan M, Rock C, Stewart CM, Perry SJ, Gurses AP. Environmental cleaning and disinfection in the operating room: a systematic scoping review through a human factors and systems engineering lens. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 2024:1-0. doi:10.1017/ice.2023.280
  • 128 Gookey G, Fray M. Facilitators and barriers to a safe opioid prescribing process in general practice. In: Balfe N, Charles R, Golightly D, editors. Ergonomics & Human Factors 2023. CIEHF; 2023.
  • 129 Reuland C SG, Deatras M, Ang M, Evangelista PP, Shilkofski N. A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to pediatric early warning score (PEWS) implementation in a resource-limited setting. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2023;11:1127752. doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1127752
  • 130 Watterson TL SL, Mott DA, Ford II JH, Portillo EC, Chui MA. Sociotechnical work system approach to occupational fatigue. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2023;49(9):485-93. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.05.007
  • 131 Pitts SI, Barasch N, Maslen AT, Thomas BA, Dorissaint LP, Decker KG, et al. Understanding CancelRx: results of end-to-end functional testing, proactive risk assessment, and pilot implementation. Applied clinical informatics. 2019;10(02):336-47. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1688698
  • 132 Jimenez YA LS. Infection prevention and control in the medical imaging environment: a scoping review. Insights into Imaging. 2023;14(1):121. doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01470-1
  • 133 Lane-Fall MB KC, Givan K, Klaiman T, Barg FK. Patient-and team-level characteristics associated with handoff protocol fidelity in a hybrid implementation study: results from a qualitative comparative analysis. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2023;49(8):356-64. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.04.003
  • 134 Herlihey TA ML, Fogarty M. Taking a systems approach to designing national safety policy. In: Balfe N CRGD, editor. Ergonomics & Human Factors 2023. NHS England, United Kingdom: CIEHF; 2023.
  • 135 Negoescu E MR, Cromie S ., et al. The medication self-management work system of patients and informal carers from a human factors & ergonomics perspective: A scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. HRB Open Res. 2023;6:4. doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.13674.1
  • 136 Ma J SX, Wang X, Liu B, Shi K. Factors Affecting Patient Adherence to Inhalation Therapy: An Application of SEIPS Model 2.0. Patient preference and adherence. 2023:531-45. doi:10.2147/PPA.S395327
  • 137 Kirkendall ES BP, Corathers SD, Ruddy RM, Fox C, Nelson H, Wetterneck TB, Rodgers I, Walsh KE. Safer type 1 diabetes care at home: SEIPS-based process mapping with parents and clinicians. Pediatric Quality & Safety. 2023;8(3):e649. doi:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000649
  • 138 Wust K BH, Werner NE, Rutkowski R, Hoonakker PL, Shah MN, Patterson BW, Pulia MS, Buckley D, Smith M, King B, editor SEIPS-based patient journey mapping: application to a patient visit in the emergency department. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 2022 Sep: Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.1177/1071181322661527
  • 139 Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety science. 2000;34(1-3):215-57. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X
  • 140 Itoh K AH, Madsen MD. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care and Patient Safety. In: Carayon P, editor. 1st ed ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. p. 133.
  • 141 Falcone ML TU, Fish AF, Van Stee SK, Werner KB. Factor Structure and Construct Validity of a Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Using Exploratory Factor Analysis. Journal of Patient Safety. 2023;19(5):323-30. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001126
  • 142 Lee SE DV, Lee JH. Testing the association between the enabling and enacting factors of patient safety culture and patient safety: structural equation modelling. BMC nursing. 2023;22(1):32. doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01196-x
  • 143 Duffy C, Menon N, Horak D, Bass GD, Talwar R, Lorenzi C, et al. Proactive Patient Safety: Focusing on What Goes Right in the Perioperative Environment. Journal of Patient Safety. 2023;19(4):281-6. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001113
  • 144 Ham D-H. Safety-II and resilience engineering in a nutshell: an introductory guide to their concepts and methods. Safety and health at work. 2021;12(1):10-9. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2020.11.004
  • 145 Kaya S GM, Mete B, Asilkan Z, Mete AH, Akturan S, Tuncer N, Alasirt FY, Toka O, Gunes T, Gumus R. Patient Safety Culture: Effects on Errors, Incident Reporting, and Patient Safety Grade. Journal of patient safety. 2023;19(7):439-46. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001152
  • 146 Lee W JI. Effect of Nurses' Professionalism, Work Environment, and Communication with Health Professionals on Patient Safety Culture (AHRQ 2.0.): A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study. Journal of Nursing Management. 2023. doi:10.1155/2023/1591128
  • 147 Albaalharith T, A'aqoulah A. Level of patient safety culture awareness among healthcare workers. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2023:321-32. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S376623
  • 148 Fekonja Z, Kmetec S, Mlinar Reljić N, Černe Kolarič J, Pajnkihar M, Strnad M, editors. Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture among Triage Nurses in the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare; 2023: MDPI. doi:10.3390/healthcare11243155
  • 149 Watari T KM, Nishizaki Y, Tokuda Y, Nagao Y. Safety culture survey among medical residents in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study. BMJ Open Quality. 2023;12(4):e002419. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002419
  • 150 Fuseini A-KJ, Teixeira da Costa EIM, Matos FASd, Merino-Godoy M-d-l-A, Nave F, editors. Patient-safety culture among emergency and critical care nurses in a maternal and child department. Healthcare; 2023: MDPI. doi:10.3390/healthcare11202770
  • 151 Curtis SJ, Trewin A, McCormack LM, Were K, McDermott K, Walsh N. Building a safety culture for infection prevention and control adherence at Howard Springs: a workplace survey. Infection, Disease & Health. 2023;28(1):47-53. doi:10.1016/j.idh.2022.07.004 doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.11.004
  • 152 Vail SG D-DR, Kogut D, Winslow LD, Kolb D, Weckenman A, Almeida S, King HB, Chessen E, Strickland M, Logan E. Teamwork is associated with reduced hospital staff burnout at military treatment facilities: findings from the 2019 department of defense patient safety culture survey. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2023;49(2):79-88. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.11.004
  • 153 Sousa VT DH, Sousa FP, Oliveira RM, Costa EC, Vasconcelos PF. Professional burnout and patient safety culture in Primary Health Care. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. 2023. doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0311pt
  • 154 Kim S KR, Baernholdt M, Lynn MR, Jones CB. Patient safety culture: the impact on workplace violence and health worker burnout. Workplace health & safety. 2023;76:e20220311. doi:10.1177/21650799221126364