Two-Flap Technique, Superior Pedicle and Central Pedicle Retro Glandular Flap: Innovative Technique to Ensure Upper Pole Fullness after Breast Reduction Surgery

Abstract

Introduction The two-flap technique, superior pedicle flap and central pedicle retro glandular (RG) flap, represents a novel advancement in breast reduction surgery, addressing issues such as upper pole deflation, asymmetry, and overall breast contour irregularities seen with traditional methods. This study evaluates the outcomes, efficacy, and safety of the two-flap technique, emphasizing its ability to provide enhanced aesthetic results and high patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 165 patients who underwent the two-flap technique between February 2022 and February 2024. The technique involved preoperative skin markings for precise flap creation, using superior and central pedicles to ensure optimal vascularity and contour. Tissue reduction was performed based on individual patient needs, and post-surgical follow-ups ranged from 6 months to 1 year. Data collected included demographic details, tissue reduction volumes, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software.

Results The majority of patients (66.67%) were aged 31 to 40 years, with a mean age of 34.59 years. Tissue reduction ranged from 200 to 800 g, with 48.49% of patients having 200 to 400 g removed. Complications included seroma in 7.27% and wound dehiscence in 3.64%. Patient satisfaction was high, with 89.09% reporting being “highly satisfied.” The technique demonstrated significant improvements in upper pole fullness and breast contour.

Conclusion The two-flap technique offers a safe, effective, and aesthetically pleasing solution for breast reduction surgery. Its innovative approach minimizes complications and maximizes patient satisfaction, though further studies are recommended to validate its efficacy in larger breast sizes.

Keywords

two-flap technique - breast reduction surgery - upper pole fullness - breast aesthetics

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by GeneBandhu Ethics Committee (Ref- ECG031/2024); the meeting was held on October 13, 2024.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. Februar 2025

• References

• 1 Swanson E. Breast reduction versus breast reduction plus implants: a comparative study with measurements and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 2 (12) e281
• 2 Graf R, Biggs TM, Steely RL. Breast shape: a technique for better upper pole fullness. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000; 24 (05) 348-352
• 3 Widgerow AD. Suspension techniques in breast reduction: preventing bottoming out. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (04) 349-354
• 4 Gusenoff JA, Vega SJ, Rubin JP. Enhancing breast contour: the role of upper pole fullness in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (02) 394-400
• 5 Swanson E. Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive cases of breast reduction using the vertical and wise patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (05) 542e-553e
• 6 Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S. et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (04) 823-837
• 7 Coriddi M, Nadeau M, Taghizadeh M, Taylor A. Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (02) 285-290
• 8 Hidalgo DA. Improving outcomes in breast reduction surgery: consideration of aesthetic and functional aspects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (04) 130-136
• 9 Chang CH, Cheng MH. Comparing the outcomes of upper pole fullness in breast reduction surgery techniques. Journal of Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery 2014; 9 (03) 102-110
• 10 Tebbetts JB. A critical analysis of short-scar breast reduction techniques. Aesthet Surg J 2002; 22 (02) 100-110