J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2025; 86(S 01): S1-S576
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1803564
Presentation Abstracts
Podium Presentations
Poster Presentations

Outcomes of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implant for Reconstruction in a Tertiary Referral Center

Authors

  • Hakan Demirci

    1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Almila Sarigul Sezenoz

    2   Department of Opthalmology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Sarinee Juntipwong

    1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Zhengyang Zhao

    1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Christine Nelson

    1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Denise Kim

    1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
 

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to assess surgical outcomes of 3-dimensional (3D) printed custom porous polyethylene cast-molded orbital implants with the use of digital mirroring from the contralateral orbits in diverse orbital reconstruction settings.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving 3D-printed custom orbital implants at a single tertiary center from 2020 to 2023 was performed. Each patient had undergone a detailed ophthalmologic examination and was evaluated radiologically by using thin-slice multiplanar CT imaging preoperatively. For each patient, high-resolution CT scans were utilized to generate 3D models of their existing bony structures (Fig. 1). The contralateral orbit’s 3D shape on the CT scan was digitally mirrored to the affected side (Fig. 2). Subsequently, a skull was 3D printed, and a custom porous polyethylene implant (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) was fabricated via cast-molding to achieve the intended normal orbital contour, with the implant designed to fill the defect in comparison to the contralateral side (Fig. 3). Patient data included demographics, preoperative computed tomography findings, pre- and postoperative clinical features, surgery duration, and surgical complications.

Results: A total of eight patients (five males and three females) were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 47.8 years (range: 23–73 years). Indications for surgery were diplopia, enophthalmos, hypoglobus, orbital, or facial deformities after significant trauma or tumor removal. One patient had bilateral orbital defects due to orbital blow-out fractures while others had unilateral orbital defects. The mean follow-up time was 27.88 ± 9.66 months (range: 7–38 months). Trauma accounted for six (75%) cases, silent sinus syndrome for one (12.5%), and facial deformity for one (12.5%) after tumor resection. Orbital fractures most commonly involved the orbital floor (n = 6, 100%), followed by medial (n = 2, 33.3%), and lateral walls (n = 1, 16.6%). The mean surgery duration was 183.4 minutes (range: 61–245), with 66.7% of trauma cases (n = 4/6) needing prior hardware removal. Postoperative improvement was seen for enophthalmos in seven of eight cases, hypoglobus in three of five cases, and diplopia in three of four cases, and the average exophthalmometry asymmetry improved from 3.1 to 0.5 mm.

Conclusion: 3D-printed custom orbital implants designed using contralateral orbit mirroring techniques demonstrated effectiveness and safety in this diverse series of orbital reconstruction cases, yielding significant improvements in enophthalmos, hypoglobus, and diplopia even in the presence of bilateral orbital defects. This study supports the use of 3D printed custom orbital implant use for a variety of complex orbital reconstruction indications.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 February 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany