J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2025; 86(S 01): S1-S576
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1803605
Presentation Abstracts
Podium Presentations
Poster Presentations

Surgical Management of Pontine Brainstem Cavernous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Emphasizing Safe Entry Zones and Clinical Outcomes

Brandon M. Edelbach
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States
,
Ahmad K. AlMekkawi
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Luke's Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Dylan Glaser
3   School of Medicine, Univeristy of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Vani B. Patel
3   School of Medicine, Univeristy of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Amulya Manchikanti
3   School of Medicine, Univeristy of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Rohit Rajput
3   School of Medicine, Univeristy of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Carlos A. Bagley
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Luke's Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, United States
,
Jonathan D. Breshears
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Luke's Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Yifei Duan
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Luke's Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
,
Yifei Duan
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Luke's Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
› Author Affiliations
 

Objective: Safe entry zones (SEZs) have emerged as important corridors for accessing brain stem cavernous malformations (BSCM) while minimizing morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyze the surgical management of pontine BSCM with a focus on SEZs.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed for articles published from 1986 to June 2024 reporting on the surgical management of pontine BSCM. Data were extracted on patient demographics, clinical presentation, BSCM characteristics, surgical approach, use of SEZs, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed to identify factors associated with improved outcomes.

Results: Fifty-seven studies with a total of 490 patients were included. The cohort was 54% female with an average age of 33.42 ± 17.7 years. The most common presenting symptoms varied based on BSCM location within the pons. The two most common BSCM locations were peritrigeminal (31.25%) and rhomboid (33.13%). The most frequently used surgical approach was the suboccipital telovelar approach (31.8%), and the most commonly utilized SEZ was the lateral pontine zone (34.1%). Gross total resection was achieved in 65.6% of cases. Good clinical outcome (follow-up mRS < 2) was observed in 64.1% of patients, with an overall mortality rate of 1.0%. The use of SEZs for BSCM located in the middle peduncular region was associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: Surgical resection of pontine BSCM can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates when utilizing SEZs. The lateral pontine, supratrigeminal, and peritrigeminal SEZs are associated with high rates of complete resection and improved neurological outcomes. BSCM location dictates the choice of SEZ and surgical approach, emphasizing the importance of understanding the regional anatomy of the brainstem.

Pontine BSCM patient demographics

Descriptor

Outcome

Cohort

490

Age

33.42 ± 17.7

Hemorrhagic presentation

299

Number of preoperative hemorrhages

1.68 ± 0.92

Duration of preoperative symptoms (wk)

68.63 ± 154.8

Safe entry ones for resection of pontine BSCM

SEZ

Frequency (%)

Location of BSCM

GTR (%)

Change in mRS

LPZ

34.1

PeritrigeminalMiddle peduncle

82.8

-0.86

STZ

12.9

Middle peduncle

72.7

-1.0

PTZ

11.8

middle peduncle

60.0

-0.50

ICZ

9.4

inferior peduncle

75.0

-1.5

Predictive factors associated with improved clinical outcome

Variable

Odds ratio

95% C.I.

p-Value

Preoperative hemorrhage

0.748

0.520–1.076

0.118

Use of SEZ

2.409

1.279–4.54

0.006

GTR

1.369

0.959–1.953

0.083

Basilar pons

0.075

0.010–0.584

0.013

Middle peduncular pons

6.759

2.322–19.673

0.0005

Cross midline

0.466

0.138–1.567

0.217

Zoom
Zoom


Publication History

Article published online:
07 February 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany