Nuklearmedizin 2025; 64(01): 95-96
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1804422
Abstracts │ NuklearMedizin 2025
Wissenschaftliche Poster
Radionuklidtherapien

RECIP 1.0 using post-treatment SPECT/CT vs. PSMA PET/CT in patients with extended [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T radiopharmaceutical therapy beyond 6 cycles

S Kunte
1   Bayerisches Zentrum für Krebsforschung (BZKF), München
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
,
L Hempel
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
,
Z Ells
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
3   Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
,
J Zahner
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
,
G Sheikh
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
,
J Casuscelli
4   Department of Urology, LMU Munich University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Deutschland
,
M Zacherl
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
,
A Delker
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
,
C Lapa
5   Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland
,
A Holzgreve
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
3   Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
,
L Unterrainer
1   Bayerisches Zentrum für Krebsforschung (BZKF), München
2   Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Munich University Hospital, Munich, Deutschland
3   Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
› Institutsangaben
 

Ziel/Aim: Response Evaluation Criteria in Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 is an evidence-based framework that is used to assess the response to therapy in PSMA-PET/CT. Innovative approaches of 177Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) extend treatment beyond the currently approved 6 cycles. So far, no data are available on the use of RECIP 1.0 in post-therapeutic SPECT under extended 177Lu-PSMA RPT. We aimed at comparing RECIP 1.0 results of PET and SPECT with biochemical response in patients with extended 177Lu-PSMA RPT.

Methodik/Methods: Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who completed more than 6 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T RPT were included in the retrospective analysis. Total tumor volume (TTV) was measured using 24h post-therapeutic SPECT (SUV>3) after the 6th and 8th cycles, and PSMA-PET after the 6th, and after the 8th cycles. TTVs and PSA levels were compared, with RECIP 1.0 criteria used to assess response to PSMA therapy in both SPECT and PET.

Ergebnisse/Results: In total, 9 patients were included in the analysis. The PSA level significantly increased between the 6th and 8th cycle (6th: median 18.9 ng/mL; Q1: 8.01 ng/mL; Q3: 35.6 ng/mL; 8th: median 33.2 ng/mL; Q1: 7.4 ng/mL; Q3: 68.7 ng/mL; p=0.039). In contrast to the PET-derived total tumor volume (TTV; p=0.039), the SPECT-derived TTV did not increase significantly (p=0.164). According to RECIP 1.0 criteria progressive disease (PD) was seen in SPECT in 8/9 cases and in PET in 7/9 cases. Stable disease (SD) was seen in PET in 2/9 and partial response (PR) in SPECT in 1/9 cases. A PSA increase of>10% was detected in 6/9 cases; out of those, 1/6 showed PD in PET and SPECT, 1/6 showed SD in PET and PR in SPECT and 1/6 showed SD in PET and PD in SPECT.

Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that post-treatment SPECT/CT may be suited for response assessment of extended 177Lu-PSMA RPT beyond 6 cycles, even if it may capture total PSMA-positive tumor burden less accurately than PSMA PET. A comparison of SPECT-based response across RPT cycles with PSMA PET at different time points of RPT is ongoing. Whether post-treatment SPECT-based response assessment is prognostic has to be shown in larger studies including outcome-correlated prospective trials.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. März 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany