Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1806843
Original Article

Evaluation of Angular Parameters of Craniocervical Junction and Establishing Their Relevance in the Diagnosis of Basilar Invagination

Kulwant Singh
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Vikrant Yadav 
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Ravi Shankar Prasad
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Anurag Sahu
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Nityanand Pandey
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background

The craniocervical junction (CCJ), composed of the atlas, axis, and occipital bone, is a critical anatomical consideration incorporating vital osseoligamentous and neurovascular structures. Basilar invagination (BI) is one of the most common CCJ anomalies. Elaborative research has been done on different linear craniometric parameters for diagnosing BI, but the role of the angular craniometric parameters is still under research. This study aims to describe a detailed analysis of the angular craniometric parameters in the population of the northern part of India. We also aim to describe the different angular craniometric parameters that are useful in establishing the diagnosis of BI.

Methods

A total of 49 patients who underwent surgery for BI and met the criteria for the required bony landmarks used in the angular craniometric analysis were included in this study. Angular craniometric analysis was also performed for 120 controls who were screened for head and spine injuries following trauma, and subsequent scans showed no sign of radiological abnormalities.

Results

In this study, 49 patients were analyzed, who underwent surgery for BI, of which 67.35% (n = 33) patients were males and 32.65% (n = 16) were females. The values of Boogard's angle (BgA) greater than 145 degrees and foramen magnum angle (FMA) greater than 18 degrees were highly diagnostic of BI, with 99.41 and 100% diagnostic accuracies, respectively. Similarly, the value of the tentorial twinning line angle (TtwA) less than 31.9 degrees was highly diagnostic of BI with diagnostic accuracy of 78.11%. The diagnostic accuracy of the combination of TtwA with BgA (91.12%) and with FMA (91.72%) was higher than that of TtwA alone.

Conclusion

FMA and BgA have excellent diagnostic accuracy for BI. TtwA can also be used for establishing the diagnosis of BI in the congenital occipital bone anomalies and comparison of preoperative and postoperative measurements following the surgical procedure like foramen magnum decompression.

Keywords

craniocervical junction - basilar invagination - Boogard's angle - foramen magnum angle - tentorial twinning line angle


Publication History

Article published online:
21 May 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Lopez AJ, Scheer JK, Leibl KE, Smith ZA, Dlouhy BJ, Dahdaleh NS. Anatomy and biomechanics of the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurg Focus 2015; 38 (04) E2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Nishikawa M, Sakamoto H, Hakuba A, Nakanishi N, Inoue Y. Pathogenesis of Chiari malformation: a morphometric study of the posterior cranial fossa. J Neurosurg 1997; 86 (01) 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Wagner A, Grassner L, Kögl N. et al. Chiari malformation type I and basilar invagination originating from atlantoaxial instability: a literature review and critical analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162 (07) 1553-1563
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Goel A. Basilar invagination, Chiari malformation, syringomyelia: a review. Neurol India 2009; 57 (03) 235-246
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 McGREGER M. The significance of certain measurements of the skull in the diagnosis of basilar impression. Br J Radiol 1948; 21 (244) 171-181
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Chamberlain WE. Basilar impression (platybasia): a bizarre developmental anomaly of the occipital bone and upper cervical spine with striking and misleading neurologic manifestations. Yale J Biol Med 1939; 11 (05) 487-496
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Smoker WR. Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. Radiographics 1994; 14 (02) 255-277
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Botelho RV, Ferreira ED. Angular craniometry in craniocervical junction malformation. Neurosurg Rev 2013; 36 (04) 603-610 , discussion 610
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Koenigsberg RA, Vakil N, Hong TA. et al. Evaluation of platybasia with MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26 (01) 89-92
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sardhara J, Behari S, Singh S. et al. A universal craniometric index for establishing the diagnosis of basilar invagination. Neurospine 2021; 18 (01) 206-216
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Diniz JM, Botelho RV. The role of clivus length and cranial base flexion angle in basilar invagination and Chiari malformation pathophysiology. Neurol Sci 2020; 41 (07) 1751-1757
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Henderson Sr FC, Henderson Jr FC, Wilson IV WA, Mark AS, Koby M. Utility of the clivo-axial angle in assessing brainstem deformity: pilot study and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2018; 41 (01) 149-163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Goel A, Bhatjiwale M, Desai K. Basilar invagination: a study based on 190 surgically treated patients. J Neurosurg 1998; 88 (06) 962-968
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Relethford JH. Population-specific deviations of global human craniometric variation from a neutral model. Am J Phys Anthropol 2010; 142 (01) 105-111
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Relethford JH. Craniometric variation among modern human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol 1994; 95 (01) 53-62
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Abel MF, Menezes AH. Basilar invagination. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (03) 39-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Boogard JA. De Indrukking der Grondvlakte van Schedel Dorr de Werwelkolom, Hare Oorzaken en Gevolgen. Nederl Tysdschr V Geneesk Tweede Afedling; 1865
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ferreira JA, Botelho RV. Determination of normal values of the basal angle in the era of magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg 2019; 132: 363-367
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Teveras JM, Ferucci JT. Taveras and Ferucci's Radiology on CD-ROM. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2003
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Alkoç OA, Songur A, Eser O. et al. Stereological and morphometric analysis of MRI Chiari malformation type-1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015; 58 (05) 454-461
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Nascimento JJC, Neto EJS, Mello-Junior CF, Valença MM, Araújo-Neto SA, Diniz PRB. Diagnostic accuracy of classical radiological measurements for basilar invagination of type B at MRI. Eur Spine J 2019; 28 (02) 345-352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Baysal B, Eser MB, Sorkun M. Radiological approach to basilar invagination type B: reliability and accuracy. J Neuroradiol 2022; 49 (01) 33-40
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Karagöz F, Izgi N, Kapíjcíjoğlu Sencer S. Morphometric measurements of the cranium in patients with Chiari type I malformation and comparison with the normal population. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144 (02) 165-171 , discussion 171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Ferreira JA, Botelho RV. The odontoid process invagination in normal subjects, Chiari malformation and Basilar invagination patients: pathophysiologic correlations with angular craniometry. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6: 118
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Jian Q, Zhang B, Jian F, Bo X, Chen Z. Basilar invagination: a tilt of the foramen magnum. World Neurosurg 2022; 164: e629-e635
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Nascimento JJC, Silva LM, Ribeiro ECO, Neto EJS, Araújo-Neto SA, Diniz PRB. Foramen magnum angle: a new parameter for basilar invagination of type B. World Neurosurg 2021; 152: 121-123
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bollo RJ, Riva-Cambrin J, Brockmeyer MM, Brockmeyer DL. Complex Chiari malformations in children: an analysis of preoperative risk factors for occipitocervical fusion. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012; 10 (02) 134-141
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ma L, Guo L, Li X. et al. Clivopalate angle: a new diagnostic method for basilar invagination at magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2019; 29 (07) 3450-3457
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Bogdanov EI, Faizutdinova AT, Heiss JD. Posterior cranial fossa and cervical spine morphometric abnormalities in symptomatic Chiari type 0 and Chiari type 1 malformation patients with and without syringomyelia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163 (11) 3051-3064
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Pan KS, Heiss JD, Brown SM, Collins MT, Boyce AM. Chiari I malformation and basilar invagination in fibrous dysplasia: prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33 (11) 1990-1998
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar