CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1808255
Original Article

Deep Bite Correction with the Invisalign System: A Case-Series Study

Trey Spillers III
1   Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
,
David Alexandre Cruz Walma
2   Department of Orthodontics, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
,
Jerry Don Spillers Jr.
1   Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
,
1   Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
,
Terpsithea Christou
1   Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective

This article assesses the dental and skeletal changes resulting from correction of a deep bite using Invisalign clear aligner therapy (Align Technology, Santa Clara, California, United States).

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective case series study that analyzed pre- and posttreatment cephalograms for 37 adult deep bite patients. Each patient was treated by one experienced clinician using the same treatment protocol. Ten linear and 9 angular variables were evaluated pre- and posttreatment. The Wilcoxon analysis was used to determine if there was a significant difference in the 19 variables pre- and posttreatment.

Results

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for 14 of 19 variables. These included a decrease in overjet (–1.0 mm), decrease in overbite (–4.1 mm), extrusion of the upper first molar (+0.5 mm), intrusion of the upper incisor (–0.6 mm), extrusion of the lower second molar (+1.0 mm), lower first molar (+1.2 mm), lower second premolar (+1.70 mm), and lower first premolar (+1.7 mm), intrusion of the lower incisor (–1.8 mm), proclination of lower incisor (+4.1 degrees), and an increase in sella-nasion- mandibular plane (+0.6 mm). A decrease in anterior occlusal plane was also significant.

Conclusion

Invisalign is an effective treatment modality for correcting dental deep bites through posterior extrusion and anterior intrusion. Minimal skeletal changes are seen when correcting deep bites with Invisalign. Results of this study enhance our understanding of the dental and skeletal changes that can be expected when attempting to correct deep bites with clear aligner therapy.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Authors' Contributions

T.S. conceived the idea, processed the experimental data, designed figures/tables, and wrote significant portion of the manuscript. J.D.S. treated the patients and provided the patient's data. C.H.K. contributed to the implementation of research and the final version of the manuscript. D.A.C.W. created all illustrative items and wrote a significant portion of the manuscript. T.C. designed the study, processed the experimental data, interpreted the statistical analysis, and wrote significant portion of the manuscript.


Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama, USA, and the study's protocol identifications is Protocol No. IRB#300010568.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Article published online:
24 June 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Moshiri M. Product review and demonstration of the Invisalign clear aligner system. AJO DO Clin Companion 2021; 1 (01) 7-21
  • 2 Jaber ST, Hajeer MY, Sultan K. Treatment effectiveness of clear aligners in correcting complicated and severe malocclusion cases compared to fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. Cureus 2023; 15 (04) e38311
  • 3 Muro MP, Caracciolo ACA, Patel MP, Feres MFN, Roscoe MG. Effectiveness and predictability of treatment with clear orthodontic aligners: a scoping review. Int Orthod 2023; 21 (02) 100755
  • 4 Kesling HD. The philosophy of the tooth positioning appliance. Am J Orthodont Dentofacial Orthop 1945; 31 (06) 297-304
  • 5 Joffe L. Invisalign: early experiences. J Orthod 2003; 30 (04) 348-352
  • 6 Weir T. Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment. Aust Dent J 2017; 62 (Suppl. 01) 58-62
  • 7 Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Periodontal health during clear aligners treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37 (05) 539-543
  • 8 Piancino MG, Tortarolo A, Di Benedetto L, Crincoli V, Falla D. Chewing patterns and muscular activation in deep bite malocclusion. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (06) 1702
  • 9 Bhateja NK, Fida M, Shaikh A. Deep bite malocclusion: exploration of the skeletal and dental factors. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2016; 28 (03) 449-454
  • 10 Skieller V, Björk A, Linde-Hansen T. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample. Am J Orthod 1984; 86 (05) 359-370
  • 11 Huang GJ, Bates SB, Ehlert AA, Whiting DP, Chen SS, Bollen AM. Stability of deep-bite correction: a systematic review. J World Fed Orthod 2012; 1 (03) e89-e86
  • 12 Berg RE, Stenvik A, Espeland L. A 57-year follow-up study of occlusion. Part 2: oral health and attitudes to teeth among individuals with deep overbite at the age of 8 years. J Orofac Orthop 2008; 69 (04) 309-324
  • 13 Kelly JE, Harvey CR. An assessment of the occlusion of the teeth of youths 12-17 years. Vital Health Stat 11 1977; (162) 1-65
  • 14 Kravitz ND, Moshiri M, Nicozisis J. et al. Mechanical considerations for deep-bite correction with aligners. Semin Orthod 2020; 26 (03) 134-138
  • 15 Kravitz ND, Jorgensen G, Frey S, Cope J. Resin bite turbos. J Clin Orthod 2018; 52 (09) 456-461
  • 16 Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952; 22 (03) 142-145
  • 17 Ellis III E, McNamara Jr JA. Cephalometric evaluation of incisor position. Angle Orthod 1986; 56 (04) 324-344
  • 18 Christou T, Abarca R, Christou V, Kau CH. Smile outcome comparison of Invisalign and traditional fixed-appliance treatment: a case-control study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020; 157 (03) 357-364
  • 19 Björk A. Variability and age changes in overjet and overbite. Am J Orthod 1953; 39 (10) 779-801
  • 20 Ingervall B, Helkimo E. Masticatory muscle force and facial morphology in man. Arch Oral Biol 1978; 23 (03) 203-206
  • 21 Khosravi R, Cohanim B, Hujoel P. et al. Management of overbite with the Invisalign appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151 (04) 691-699.e2
  • 22 Rozzi M, Mucedero M, Pezzuto C, Cozza P. Leveling the curve of Spee with continuous archwire appliances in different vertical skeletal patterns: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 151 (04) 758-766
  • 23 Henick D, Dayan W, Dunford R, Warunek S, Al-Jewair T. Effects of Invisalign (G5) with virtual bite ramps for skeletal deep overbite malocclusion correction in adults. Angle Orthod 2021; 91 (02) 164-170
  • 24 Rozzi M, Tiberti G, Mucedero M, Cozza P. Leveling the curve of Spee: comparison between continuous archwire treatment and Invisalign system: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022; 162 (05) 645-655
  • 25 Shahabuddin N, Kang J, Jeon HH. Predictability of the deep overbite correction using clear aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2023; 163 (06) 793-801
  • 26 Čelar A, Tafaj E, Graf A, Lettner S. Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions : a lateral cephalometric radiograph study. J Orofac Orthop 2018; 79 (04) 267-276