Outcome of Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap for Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects in Indian Population and Their Correlation with Flap Dimensions

Abstract

Introduction

This is a study to assess versatility of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for reconstruction of head and neck defects. This study has also evaluated complications of SCAIF and their correlation with flap dimensions.

Materials and Methods

This is a prospective study done at a single institute for 1-year duration. A total of 30 patients with head and neck cancer were included in the study. SCAIF was used in all patients for reconstruction of defect after carcinoma resection. Postoperative follow-up was done for 3 weeks. The study variables were location of defect, length and width of flap, time taken for flap harvest, and complications.

Results

Flap-related early complications were observed in 6 (20%) patients. These early complications were distal margin necrosis in four patients, partial flap loss in one patient, and wound infection and development of orocutaneous fistula in one patient. Stiffness in neck and shoulder movements (late complication) was noted in two patients. Among patients who developed complications, the mean flap length was 16.38 cm when compared with 15.68 cm among those who did not develop complications. Difference in mean flap length was found to be statistically significant (p-value = 0.019).

Conclusion

SCAIF provides a skin paddle which is hairless, thin, pliable, and color-matched with the recipient site in the head and neck region. However, its limited reach and smaller volume should be kept in mind while planning reconstruction. The safe length of SCAIF is 16 to 17 cm (up to lower third of deltoid muscle), which makes it a suitable choice for defect of lower third of the head and neck region.

Keywords

supraclavicular artery island flap - head and neck defects - flap dimensions - complications

Authors' Contributions

S.V. and S.M. contributed to the concept and design of the study and were involved in the clinical work. A.B. was responsible for data collection, data analysis, clinical work, literature search, and contributed to manuscript writing and editing. S.G. participated in the concept and design of the study, clinical work, data analysis, literature search, and was involved in both writing and editing the manuscript. F.K., A.G., and R.S.G. were involved in the clinical work and manuscript review.

Ethical Approval

The study has been approved by Institutional Review Board of our institute; written informed consent was taken from all the patients; confidentiality was maintained throughout the study.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. Mai 2025

• References

• 1 Lamberty BG, Cormack GC. Misconceptions regarding the cervico-humeral flap. Br J Plast Surg 1983; 36 (01) 60-63
• 2 Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99 (07) 1878-1884 , discussion 1885–1886
• 3 Pallua N, Magnus Noah E. The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (03) 842-851 , discussion 852–854
• 4 Vinh VQ, Van Anh T, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H. Anatomical and clinical studies of the supraclavicular flap: analysis of 103 flaps used to reconstruct neck scar contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (05) 1471-1480
• 5 Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (01) 115-123
• 6 Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK. The supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: applications and limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (11) 1247-1255
• 7 Atallah S, Guth A, Chabolle F, Bach CA. Supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2015; 132 (05) 291-294
• 8 Wong S, Brennan M, Nishikawa S, Lim JH. Supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: a case series and literature review. Perm J 2019; 23: 23
• 9 Nasr HY, Friedlander P, Chiu ES. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: 15-year experience, past, present, future. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (06) e5052
• 10 Nthumba PM. The supraclavicular artery flap: a versatile flap for neck and orofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (08) 1997-2004
• 11 Giordano L, Di Santo D, Bondi S. et al. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction: an Italian multi-institutional experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2018; 38 (06) 497-503
• 12 Chan JWH, Wong C, Ward K, Saint-Cyr M, Chiu ES. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography studies of the supraclavicular artery island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (02) 525-531
• 13 Telang P, Jagannathan M, Devale M. A study of the use of the supraclavicular artery flap for resurfacing of head, neck, and upper torso defects. Indian J Plast Surg 2009; 42 (01) 4-12
• 14 More A, Sivakumar A, Gaurav GK. Supraclavicular flap for large anterior chest wall defects-a road less travelled. Indian J Plast Surg 2020; 53 (03) 427-430
• 15 Thaduri A. et al. Supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: our experience. J Head Neck Phys Surg 2023; 11: 102-106
• 16 Padiyar BV, Azeem Mohiyuddin SM, Sagayaraj A, Merchant S. Usefulness of supraclavicular flap in reconstruction following resection of oral cancer. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 4 (02) 148-152
• 17 Shenoy A, Patil VS, Prithvi BS, Chavan P, Halkud R. Supraclavicular artery flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: an emerging alternative. Int J Surg Oncol 2013; 2013: 658989
• 18 Mahipathy SR. et al. Supraclavicular artery flaps for head and neck reconstruction: a prospective study. Int Surg J 2020; 7 (09) 3060-3064
• 19 Granzow JW, Suliman A, Roostaeian J, Perry A, Boyd JB. Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) vs free fasciocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (06) 941-948
• 20 Welz C, Canis M, Schwenk-Zieger S, Spiegel JL, Weiss BG, Pilavakis Y. Oral cancer reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap: comparison to free radial forearm flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 75 (10) 2261-2269
• 21 Yu P. The transverse cervical vessels as recipient vessels for previously treated head and neck cancer patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (05) 1253-1258
• 22 Razdan SN, Albornoz CR, Ro T. et al. Safety of the supraclavicular artery island flap in the setting of neck dissection and radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (05) 378-383
• 23 Kokot N, Kim JH, West JD, Zhang P. Supraclavicular artery island flap: critical appraisal and comparison to alternate reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (Suppl. 03) 1-14