RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809615
AI-Driven ECG: The Smart Future of Cardiology

Introduction
For over a century, the electrocardiogram (ECG) has been a cornerstone of cardiovascular diagnostics—offering a noninvasive, accessible, and rapid assessment of cardiac electrical activity. It remains vital in detecting arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, conduction abnormalities, and structural heart diseases. Yet, its interpretation has traditionally depended on clinician expertise, which can lead to inconsistent accuracy.[1] [2]
Studies reveal that nearly one-third of ECG readings contain major errors. A 2020 meta-analysis found a median interpretation accuracy of only 54% among physicians, rising modestly to 67% after educational interventions. These persistent gaps highlight the limitations of human interpretation despite training efforts.[3]
Such challenges have fueled interest in more advanced solutions. [Table 1] contrasts traditional ECG interpretation with artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches in terms of accuracy, scalability, and clinical relevance. The need for automated ECG analysis is particularly pressing in low- and middle-income countries, where over 75% of global cardiovascular deaths occur and access to expert cardiologists is limited.[4]
Abbreviations; AI, artificial intelligence; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Recent advances in AI, especially deep learning, are reshaping ECG analysis. AI algorithms can process vast data sets, detect subtle patterns beyond human perception, and deliver highly accurate predictive insights. These tools have demonstrated promise in diagnosing latent or asymptomatic conditions such as left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and cardiac amyloidosis (CA)—often before symptoms emerge ([Table 2]).
Abbreviations; AFib, atrial fibrillation; AI, artificial intelligence; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ECG, electrocardiogram; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; PVC, premature ventricular contraction; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
AI, particularly machine learning and deep neural networks, is rapidly becoming a transformative force in cardiology. The following sections explore key clinical applications where AI-enhanced ECG has shown significant diagnostic and prognostic value.[5] [6]
Financial Support
None.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 27. April 2025
Angenommen: 11. Mai 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. Juli 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Krikler DM. Historical aspects of electrocardiography. Cardiol Clin 1987; 5 (03) 349-355
- 2 Cook DA, Oh SY, Pusic MV. Accuracy of physicians' electrocardiogram interpretations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180 (11) 1461-1471
- 3 Antiperovitch P, Zareba W, Steinberg JS. et al. Proposed in-training electrocardiogram interpretation competencies for undergraduate and postgraduate trainees. J Hosp Med 2018; 13 (03) 185-193
- 4 Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014: Attaining the Nine Global Noncommunicable Diseases Targets; A Shared Responsibility OCLC: 907517003. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014
- 5 Attia ZI, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F. et al. Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med 2019; 25 (01) 70-74
- 6 Duffy G. et al. Artificial intelligence for electrocardiography: history, current applications, and future directions. J Cardiol 2022; 79 (03) 213-225
- 7 Ribeiro AH, Ribeiro MH, Paixao GM. et al. Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural network. Nat Commun 1760; 2020: 11
- 8 Rienstra M, Lubitz SA, Mahida S. et al. Symptoms and functional status of patients with atrial fibrillation: state of the art and future research opportunities. Circulation 2012; 125 (23) 2933-2943
- 9 Attia ZI, Noseworthy PA, Lopez-Jimenez F. et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet 2019; 394 (10201): 861-867
- 10 Gadaleta M, Harrington P, Barnhill E. et al. Prediction of atrial fibrillation from at-home single-lead ECG signals without arrhythmias. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6 (01) 229
- 11 Bjerkén LV, Rønborg SN, Jensen MT, Ørting SN, Nielsen OW. Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review. Heart Fail Rev 2023; 28 (02) 419-430
- 12 Ko WY, Siontis KC, Attia ZI. et al. Detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using a convolutional neural network-enabled electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75 (07) 722-733
- 13 Kittleson MM, Maurer MS, Ambardekar AV. et al; American Heart Association Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Cardiac amyloidosis: evolving diagnosis and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020; 142 (01) e7-e22
- 14 Grogan M, Lopez-Jimenez F, Cohen-Shelly M. et al. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram for the early detection of cardiac amyloidosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96 (11) 2768-2778
- 15 Harmon DM, Heinrich CK, Dillon JJ. et al. Mortality risk stratification utilizing artificial intelligence electrocardiogram for hyperkalemia in cardiac intensive care unit patients. JACC Adv 2024; 3 (09) 101169
- 16 Galloway CD, Valys AV, Shreibati JB. et al. Development and validation of a deep-learning model to screen for hyperkalemia from the electrocardiogram. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 4 (05) 428436