Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1809699
Observational Analytic Study on Craniofacial Growth Changes in Developing Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with a Retrognathic Mandible Patients Using Myobrace
Authors
Abstract
Objectives
Myofunctional appliances have been used for correction of developing craniofacial. One of the frequently used is Myobrace. This study aims to assess the effects of the Myobrace appliance on craniofacial growth modifications in developing patients with skeletal class II malocclusion.
Materials and Methods
The research subjects totaled 11 children with predetermined criteria. Subjects were all patients who were being treated with Myobrace (prefabricated myofunctional appliance, Myofunctional Research Co., Australia) at orthodontic clinic of the Hasanuddin University Dental and Oral Hospital. Lateral cephalograms were taken for all patients before and after treatment (4 months later). The effects of the appliances on the craniofacial growth were assessed using five linear measurements (anterior craniofacial height [N-Me], posterior craniofacial height [S-Go], cranial base length [S-N], maxillary length [PNS-A], and mandibular length [Go-Pog]) before and after treatment.
Statistical Analysis
The normality test for data utilized the Shapiro–Wilk test to ascertain the analytical applicability of the standard data distribution. The paired samples t-test was used to assess different parameters between before and after treatment. The threshold for significance was at p-value of < 0.05. Data were analyzed via IBM SPSS for Windows.
Result
It was found that there was a significant change in posterior craniofacial height (S-Go), maxillary length (PNS-A), and mandibular length (Go-Pog), relationship of the mandible relative to the cranial base (SNB) values before and after treatment, and also the ANB values before and after treatment of 2.63 and 1.9 degrees, respectively. There was no significant change in anterior craniofacial height (N-Me) and cranial base length (S-N).
Conclusion
Myofunctional treatment with Myobrace appliance can help overcome class II skeletal malocclusion with retrognathic mandible during the growth period and help craniofacial growth by improving tongue position, breathing, correcting malocclusion, improving orofacial muscle function, and facial development.
Keywords
craniofacial growth - Myobrace - myofunctional - retrognathic mandible - skeletal class II malocclusionPublication History
Article published online:
17 October 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Lone IM, Zohud O, Midlej K, Proff P, Watted N, Iraqi FA. Skeletal class II malocclusion: from clinical treatment strategies to the roadmap in identifying the genetic bases of development in humans with the support of the collaborative cross mouse population. J Clin Med 2023; 12 (15) 5148
- 2 Elfouly D, Dumu EJ, Madian AM, Eid FY. The effect of different functional appliances on the sagittal pharyngeal airway dimension in skeletal class II: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 19410
- 3 García-Cando PE, Puebla-Ramos L. Orthopedic and orthodontic treatment options in skeletal Class II patients in mixed dentition [in Spanish]. Rev Metropolitana Cienc Apl (REMCA) [Internet]. 2023; 6 (suppl 1): 225-233
- 4 Manni A, Pera S, Gastaldi G, Boggio A, Cozzani M. Skeletal anchorage in treating skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients using the Herbst appliance. Oral (Basel) 2023; 3 (04) 539-544
- 5 Zhou C, Duan P, He H. et al Expert consensus on pediatric orthodontic therapies of malocclusions in children. Int J Oral Sci 2024; 16 (01) 32
- 6 Habumugisha J, Cheng B, Ma SY. et al. A non-randomized concurrent controlled trial of myofunctional treatment in the mixed dentition children with functional mouth breathing assessed by cephalometric radiographs and study models. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22 (01) 506
- 7 Kiliaridis S. The importance of masticatory muscle function in dentofacial growth. Semin Orthod 2006; 12 (02) 110-119
- 8 Rohila AK, Sharma VP, Shrivastav PK, Nagar A, Singh GP. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns. Indian J Dent Res 2012; 23 (06) 726-731
- 9 Kaur H, Tripathi T, Rai P, Garg A, Kanase A. Influence of masseter muscle thickness on buccal corridor space and craniofacial morphology: a correlative study. J Indian Orthod Soc 2016; 50 (04) 207-214
- 10 Alhasyimi AA, Syahfik I. Growth modification of developing class II division 1 malocclusion using myofunctional appliances. Case Rep Dent 2023; 2023: 8201195
- 11 Du X, Hägg U. Muscular adaptation to gradual advancement of the mandible. Angle Orthod 2003; 73(5): 525-531
- 12 He M, Hu W, Zhang Y, Jiang W. Jaw growth and development in class II division I malocclusion children using the Myobrace® muscle function appliance. Ann Ital Chir 2024; 95 (06) 1270-1279
- 13 Levrini L, Persano R, Piantanida S. et al. The effects of the Myobrace® system on peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) in patients with mixed dentition with oral dysfunction. Dent J (Basel) 2023; 11 (08) 191
- 14 Togninalli D, Antonarakis GS, Papadopoulou AK. Relationship between craniofacial skeletal patterns and anatomic characteristics of masticatory muscles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod 2024; 25 (01) 36
- 15 Rusli RO, Achmad H, Kuandinata W. et al. Myobrace versus twin block in the treatment of class II malocclusion in children: a systematic review. Saudi Dent J 2024; 36 (05) 661-664
- 16 Kumar A, Priya P, Singh S. et al. Correction of skeletal class II malocclusion in a growing child using standard twin block: a case report. Orthodontic J Nepal 2023; 13 (01) 33-38
- 17 Kalbande B, Jadhav VV, Reche A, Nerurkar S, Ghulaxe Y. Treatment of skeletal class II division 1 using twin block myofunctional appliance. Cureus 2023; 15 (10) e47713
- 18 Ellyeus MK, Sjahruddin L, Sudhana W, Koesoemahardja HD. Correlation craniofacial growth, body height and cervical vertebrae maturation stages. J Dent Indones 2011; 18 (03) 73-76
- 19 Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed.. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2019
- 20 Johnson JS, Satyaprasad S, Sharath Chandra H, Havaldar KS, Raj A, Suresh N. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using twin block appliance and myobrace system on class ii division i malocclusion. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 14 (Suppl. 01) S10-S17
- 21 Madian AM, Elfouly D. Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 998
- 22 Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Karaman AI, Guray E. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients. Angle Orthod 2004; 74 (05) 605-609
- 23 Chuang LC, Hwang YJ, Lian YC. et al. Changes in craniofacial and airway morphology as well as quality of life after passive myofunctional therapy in children with obstructive sleep apnea: a comparative cohort study. Sleep Breath 2019; 23 (04) 1359-1369
