Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810040
Computed Tomography's Impact on the Surgical Planning for Posterior Malleolar Fractures
Influência da tomografia computadorizada no planejamento cirúrgico das fraturas do maléolo posteriorFinancial Support The authors declare that they did not receive financial support from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sector to conduct the present study.

Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of computed tomography (CT) on the preoperative planning of posterior malleolus (PM) fractures of the ankle, comparing its information with that of conventional radiographs and assessing its impact on surgical treatment.
Methods
The study included 81 patients with PM fractures, whose radiological and CT images were analyzed by 33 specialized orthopedic surgeons. The study had two stages, with a radiological assessment on the first, and the second having radiological plus CT evaluation. In both stages, we asked surgeons about the PM size, fracture stability, preoperative management, and potential modifications after CT analysis.
Results
Considering only radiographs, 83.5% of the evaluators selected PM fixation. However, CT addition modified this choice in 49.1% of the cases, influencing the surgical access route and the type of osteosynthesis. In 34.7% of cases, CT revealed a larger PM fragment than radiographs, demonstrating that it is superior in evaluating fracture size and morphology.
Conclusion
The surgical planning of ankle fractures with PM involvement should routinely include CT scans for a more precise fracture line assessment and a potential change in the therapeutic decision based on simple radiography alone.
Resumo
Objetivo
Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a influência da tomografia computadorizada (TC) no planejamento pré-operatório das fraturas do maléolo posterior (MP) do tornozelo, comparando suas informações com as de radiografias convencionais (RX) e o seu impacto no tratamento cirúrgico.
Métodos
A pesquisa incluiu 81 pacientes com fraturas do MP, cujas imagens de RX e TC foram analisadas por 33 cirurgiões ortopédicos especializados. O estudo foi dividido em duas etapas, com avaliação de RX na primeira e de RX e TC na segunda. Em ambas as etapas, perguntou-se o tamanho do MP, a estabilidade da fratura, a conduta pré-operatória e as possíveis modificações após avaliar a TC.
Resultados
Os resultados mostraram que, ao considerar apenas o RX, 83,5% dos avaliadores decidiram pela fixação do MP. No entanto, ao adicionar a TC, essa decisão foi modificada em 49,1% dos casos, influenciando a via de acesso cirúrgico e o tipo de osteossíntese. A TC revelou, em 34,7% dos casos, um fragmento maior do MP em comparação ao RX, demonstrando sua superioridade na avaliação do tamanho e morfologia da fratura.
Conclusão
A TC deve ser incluída de forma rotineira no planejamento cirúrgico das fraturas do tornozelo com comprometimento do maléolo posterior, pois permite uma avaliação mais precisa do traço de fratura e pode mudar a decisão terapêutica baseada somente na RX.
Palavras-chave
cirurgiões - fraturas do tornozelo - radiografia - tomografia computadorizada por raios xAuthors' Contributions
Each author contributed individually and significantly to the development of this study. NDMN: conceptualization, validation, data collection and analysis, methodology, and paper drafting and writing. PFTN: validation, data collection and analysis, methodology, paper drafting and writing, and table and figure editing and formatting. JMPB: writing and review and table and figure editing and formatting. MTC: writing, review, and editing. RWC: Conceptualization, methodology, and final revision. NRS: conceptualization, methodology, and final revision.
Study developed at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Santa Casa de São Paulo – Pavilhão “Fernandinho Simonsen”, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil.
Publication History
Received: 13 November 2024
Accepted: 26 May 2025
Article published online:
08 September 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Noé De Marchi Neto, Pietro Felice Tomazini Nesello, Jordanna Maria Pereira Bergamasco, Marco Túlio Costa, Ralph Walter Christian, Nilson Roberto Severino. Computed Tomography's Impact on the Surgical Planning for Posterior Malleolar Fractures. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2025; 60: s00451810040.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810040
-
References
- 1 Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M. Posterior malleolar fractures: Changing concepts and recent developments. Foot Ankle Clin 2017; 22 (01) 125-145
- 2 Drijfhout van Hooff CC, Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM. Influence of fragment size and postoperative joint congruency on long-term outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2015; 36 (06) 673-678
- 3 Nelson M, Jensen N. The treatment of trimalleolar fractures of the ankle. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1940; 71 (04) 509-514
- 4 Magid D, Michelson JD, Ney DR, Fishman EK. Adult ankle fractures: comparison of plain films and interactive two- and three-dimensional CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154 (05) 1017-1023
- 5 Szymański T, Zdanowicz U. Comparison of routine computed tomography and plain X-ray imaging for malleolar fractures-How much do we miss?. Foot Ankle Surg 2022; 28 (02) 263-268
- 6 Ferries JS, DeCoster TA, Firoozbakhsh KK, Garcia JF, Miller RA. Plain radiographic interpretation in trimalleolar ankle fractures poorly assesses posterior fragment size. J Orthop Trauma 1994; 8 (04) 328-331
- 7 Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, Kato F. Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (05) 1085-1092
- 8 Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kostlivý K, Vaněček V, Klika D, Trešl I. Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135 (04) 505-516
- 9 Kocan J, Joseph E, Mercado P, Haider MN, Pavlesen S, Rohrbacher B. Computed tomography scans and fixation rates for trimalleolar ankle fractures over 10 years at a level 1 trauma center. Foot Ankle Orthop 2024; 9 (01) 24 730114231216984
- 10 De Marchi Neto N, Nesello PFT, Bergamasco JM, Costa MT, Christian RW, Severino NR. Importance of computed tomography in posterior malleolar fractures: Added information to preoperative X-ray studies. World J Orthop 2023; 14 (12) 868-877
- 11 Meijer DT, Keizer RJdM, Doornberg JN. et al. Ankle Platform Study Collaborative—Science of Variation Group. Diagnostic accuracy of 2-dimensional computed tomography for articular involvement and fracture pattern of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37 (01) 75-82
- 12 Donohoe S, Alluri RK, Hill JR, Fleming M, Tan E, Marecek G. Impact of computed tomography on operative planning for ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 38 (12) 1337-1342
- 13 Sheikh HQ, Mills EJ, McGregor-Riley JC, Chadwick C, Davies MB. The effect of computerised tomography on operative planning in posterior malleolus ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 26 (06) 676-680
- 14 Meijer DT, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN. et al. Ankle Platform Study Collaborative – Science of Variation Group. Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs. Injury 2015; 46 (10) 2024-2029
- 15 Black EM, Antoci V, Lee JT. et al. Role of preoperative computed tomography scans in operative planning for malleolar ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34 (05) 697-704
- 16 Rammelt S, Bartoníček J. Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2020; 8 (08) 00207
- 17 Büchler L, Tannast M, Bonel HM, Weber M. Reliability of radiologic assessment of the fracture anatomy at the posterior tibial plafond in malleolar fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (03) 208-212
- 18 Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. When and how to operate the posterior malleolus fragment in trimalleolar fractures: a systematic literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2018; 138 (09) 1213-1222
- 19 Blom RP, Meijer DT, Keizer ROdM. et al. Posterior malleolar fracture morphology determines outcome in rotational type ankle fractures. Injury 2019; 50 (07) 1392-1397
- 20 Karaismailoglu B, Yıldırım O, Aslan L. et al. Middle-sized posterior malleolus fractures: Fixed versus non-fixed - A prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Surg 2023; 29 (04) 329-333
- 21 Pflüger P, Harder F, Müller K, Biberthaler P, Crönlein M. Evaluation of ankle fracture classification systems in 193 trimalleolar ankle fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48 (05) 4181-4188
- 22 Terstegen J, Weel H, Frosch KH, Rolvien T, Schlickewei C, Mueller E. Classifications of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (07) 4181-4220
- 23 Morales S, Massri-Pugin J, Mery P, Palma J, Filippi J, Villa A. Posterior malleolar fracture assessment: An independent interobserver and intraobserver validation of three computed tomography-based classifications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2023; 7 (01) e22
- 24 Gibson PD, Bercik MJ, Ippolito JA. et al. The role of computed tomography in surgical planning for trimalleolar fracture. A Survey of OTA Members. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (04) e116-e120
- 25 Mansur NSB, Neves CMSCC, Celestino FS. et al. Computed tomography changes diagnosis, management and surgical planning of ankle fractures. Musculoskelet Surg 2024; 108 (02) 183-194