Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1810608
Original Article

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Pediatric Patients: Indications and Evolution over Twenty Years of Experience

Authors

  • Victor Goulenko

    1   Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Matthew J. Recker*

    2   Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Austin J. Iovoli**

    1   Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Danielle E. Reber***

    3   Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Venkatesh S. Madhugiri

    1   Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Robert J. Plunkett

    4   Department of Neurosurgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Matthew B. Podgorsak

    1   Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
  • Dheerendra Prasad

    1   Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
    2   Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States
    4   Department of Neurosurgery, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States
Preview

Abstract

Objective

This article aims to summarize 22 years of pediatric experience using three generations of the Gamma Knife and show how technological advances in the machine have led to better safety, patient tolerance, and wide application.

Method

A retrospective review of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) patients younger than 18 years, treated from 1999 to 2020, was conducted. Data points include primary pathology, age, lesion volume, radiation dose, fixation type, and single session versus hypofractionation. The Gamma Knife models used during this period were the Model 4C, Perfexion, and Icon, and we discuss the evolved planning and treatment delivery options.

Results

Fifty-five patients aged 2.8 to 18 years (49% between 15 and 18 years old) underwent 80 treatments: 55% of patients had tumors, and 45% had AVMs. A rigid frame was used for 49 patients; while six were secured with a thermoplastic mask, five patients had single session, with one having multiple treatments and one hypofractionation. In this group, six sessions were under general anesthesia and six with monitored anesthesia care. They presented mean deviation from the post-stereotactic registration baseline of 0.15 mm. The median dose was 20 Gy (8–28 Gy), and the median lesion volume was 1.066 cc (0.081–34.791 cc). No radiation-induced tumors have been detected in the follow-up so far.

Conclusion

GKRS is a viable modality for pediatric patients needing intracranial radiation. A variety of tumors, as well as AVMs, can be treated. Some level of anesthesia/sedation is required for most patients. The advent of thermoplastic mask fixation has expanded the use of the Gamma Knife to younger patients.

* Current affiliation: Seattle Children's Hospital – Neurosurgery, Seattle, WA, USA.


** Current affiliation: Geisinger Medical Center – Radiation Oncology, Danville, PA, USA.


*** Current affiliation: Geisinger Medical Center – Pediatric Department, Danville, PA, USA.




Publication History

Article published online:
31 July 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India