RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811195
Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Following Anterior Maxillary Implant Placement: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study

Abstract
Objectives
Long-term data evaluating both patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in anterior maxillary implant rehabilitation are still limited, making this investigation highly relevant. This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction and OHRQoL 5 years after anterior maxillary implant placement. It specifically assessed long-term satisfaction with implant-supported restorations in the aesthetic zone, the impact on OHRQoL, and key clinical and prosthetic factors influencing perceived treatment success.
Materials and Methods
A prospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Farhat Hached, Sousse, Tunisia, from March to June 2024. Eligible patients who underwent anterior maxillary implant placement between 2018 and 2019 were included. Patients with fixed implant-supported restorations and good systemic health were eligible, while those with parafunctional habits or incomplete follow-up data were excluded. Satisfaction was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and OHRQoL was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) questionnaires. A total of 50 patients participated. The sample size was determined based on an expected satisfaction rate of 80%, with a 95% confidence interval and a 10% margin of error, resulting in a required minimum of 47 participants.
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics summarized demographics, satisfaction scores, and OHRQoL outcomes. Inferential analyses included paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare baseline and 5-year follow-up data. Spearman's correlation was used to examine relationships between implant-related factors and satisfaction or OHRQoL scores, while multivariate regression identified predictors of long-term satisfaction. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Fifty patients (mean age: 36.5 ± 5.3 years) participated, with a 98.04% implant survival rate. At 5 years, 86.2% reported high satisfaction, with a mean VAS score of 92.8%. Phonetic outcomes received a 100% satisfaction rate, while chewing comfort and stability were also highly rated (94.0 and 93.7%, respectively). Esthetic satisfaction was reported by 85.0% of patients, and 67.5% had no difficulty maintaining hygiene. The OHIP-14 median score of 9.0 indicated minimal OHRQoL impairment. PIDAQ results showed that while most patients were satisfied with esthetics, some experienced psychosocial impacts.
Conclusion
Five years after anterior maxillary implant placement, patients reported high satisfaction, especially regarding phonetics, chewing comfort, and esthetics. The minimal OHRQoL impact and low PIDAQ scores highlight the positive psychosocial effects of implant restorations. These results suggest that long-term evaluation of functional and psychological outcomes should be integrated into clinical decision-making and future prospective studies.
Keywords
anterior maxillary implants - five-year evaluation - implant-related quality of life - long-term follow-up - patient satisfactionPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15 (06) 667-676
- 2 Chen P, Yu S, Zhu G. The psychosocial impacts of implantation on the dental aesthetics of missing anterior teeth patients. Br Dent J 2012; 213 (11) E20
- 3 Xie X, Zhang Z, Zhou J, Deng F. Changes of dental anxiety, aesthetic perception and oral health-related quality of life related to influencing factors of patients' demographics after anterior implant treatment: a prospective study. Int J Implant Dent 2023; 9 (01) 22
- 4 Wang Y, Bäumer D, Ozga AK, Körner G, Bäumer A. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement. BMC Oral Health 2021; 21 (01) 30
- 5 Zhang X, Wang B, Qiao SC, Gu YX, Shi JY, Lai HC. A study on the prevalence of dental anxiety, pain perception, and their interrelationship in Chinese patients with oral implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019; 21 (03) 428-435
- 6 Fonteyne E, De Bruyn H, De Fruyt F. Quality of life and social participation in dental rehabilitation: a personality and multi-informant perspective. J Dent 2020; 103S: 100021
- 7 González-Martín O, Lee E, Weisgold A, Veltri M, Su H. Contour management of implant restorations for optimal emergence profiles: guidelines for immediate and delayed provisional restorations. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2020; 40 (01) 61-70
- 8 Jose EP, Paul P, Reche A. Soft tissue management around the dental implant: a comprehensive review. Cureus 2023; 15 (10) e48042
- 9 Singh V, Bhagol A, Ashwin V. Controversies in the dental implant treatment planning for anterior maxillary aesthetic zone - a review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2023; 14 (01) 3-8
- 10 Esquivel J, Meda RG, Blatz MB. The impact of 3D implant position on emergence profile design. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2021; 41 (01) 79-86
- 11 Campos LA, Peltomäki T, Marôco J, Campos JADB. Use of Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) in different contexts. What is being measured?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (24) 13412
- 12 Alharbi RA, Eshky RT, Marae SO, Hifnawy T, Alsulaimani M. Translation and validation of the Arabic version of the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ). J Orthod Sci 2020; 9: 19
- 13 Tallarico M, Meloni SM, Canullo L, Caneva M, Polizzi G. Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing patients rehabilitated with immediately loaded maxillary cross-arch fixed dental prosthesis supported by four or six implants placed using guided surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18 (05) 965-972
- 14 Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Chuang SK, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27 (01) 102-110
- 15 Locker D, Allen PF. Developing short-form measures of oral health-related quality of life. J Public Health Dent 2002; 62 (01) 13-20
- 16 Campos LA, Costa MA, Bonafé FSS, Marôco J, Campos JADB. Psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics on dental patients. Int Dent J 2020; 70 (05) 321-327
- 17 Tanır KÖ, Avağ C, Tosun E, Akkocaoğlu M. Evaluation of the quality of life and the satisfaction level after reconstruction with anterior iliac crest graft and implant-supported fixed prosthesis treatment. J Prosthodont 2023; 32 (09) 801-806
- 18 Luo Z, Zeng R, Luo Z, Chen Z. Single implants in the esthetic zone: analysis of recent peri-implant soft tissue alterations and patient satisfaction. A photographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26 (03) 578-586
- 19 Zhang Y, Liu J, Yu D, Ding H, Wu Y. Articulation distortion in Mandarin-speaking individuals with complete arch maxillary implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2023; S0 022-3913(23)00685-6
- 20 Gonçalves GSY, de Magalhães KMF, Rocha EP, Dos Santos PH, Assunção WG. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26 (01) 83-94
- 21 Kim HS, Cho HA, Kim YY, Shin H. Implant survival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18 (01) 219
- 22 Kim JE, Park JH, Moon HS, Shim JS. Complete assessment of occlusal dynamics and establishment of a digital workflow by using target tracking with a three-dimensional facial scanner. J Prosthodont Res 2019; 63 (01) 120-124
- 23 Lee JD, Nguyen O, Lin YC. et al. Facial scanners in dentistry: an overview. Prosthesis. 2022; 4 (04) 664-678