Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811197
Role of Dynamic Perfusion CT in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Authors
Funding None.

Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of perfusion CT (PCT) in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Materials and Methods
In this ethically approved prospective study, PCT was performed in 71 patients with histologically proven PDAC. Perfusion parameters studied included blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), permeability surface area product (PS), time to peak (TTP), peak enhancement intensity (PEI), and mean transit time (MTT). Forty-four controls with no pancreatic pathology were also studied.
Results
Out of 71 patients, 43 (60.56%) were males and 28 (39.44%) were females, with male:female ratio of 1.54, and the mean age of the patients was 50.62 ± 13.86 years. The mean size of the masses was 4.47 ± 2.43 cm (range: 1.3–12 cm). Among the perfusion parameters, BF and BV were found to be the most reliable for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. They were reduced in PDAC (BF: 19.54 ± 19.85 mL/100 mL/min and BV: 5.14 ± 3.82 mL/100 mL) as compared with normal controls (BF: 96.91 ± 39.09 mL/100 mL/min and BV: 30.45 ± 12.90 mL/100 mL) and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0001). Based on ROC analysis, cut-off values of 55.25 mL/100 mL/min for BF and 14.42 mL/100 mL for BV yielded optimal sensitivity (97.2% for BF and 98.6% for BV) and specificity (91% for BF and 91% for BV) for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Conclusion
PCT parameters are useful in making an imaging diagnosis of PDAC and useful tool to detect isodense pancreatic masses. Approximated values of BF and BV perfusion parameters may serve as independent diagnostic predictors for the diagnosis of PDAC.
Data Availability Statement
Stored in the institute and can be reproduced when needed by the corresponding author's request.
Authors' Contributions
A.K.Y.: Written main manuscript, data collection, data interpretation, manuscript design and concept, prepared the figures.
N.Y.: Statistical analysis, manuscript editing, and research design.
R.P.Y.: Data Editing and manuscript correction.
S.T.: Data collection, data interpretation, manuscript design and concept, prepared the figures.
B.D.: Data collection, data interpretation, manuscript design and concept, prepared the figures.
N.P.: Data analysis and manuscript editing.
All authors reviewed the manuscript.
All authors contributed to the study from the start of the study till writing the manuscript.
Ethical Approval
This study was performed after approval from the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), Institutional Research Committee of Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Morang, Nepal. The reference number was IRC-PA-215/2022. The study was performed after the ethics declaration, following standard norms and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patients' Consent
All patients had given consent to participate in the study.
Publication History
Article published online:
12 August 2025
© 2025. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Ueno H, Kosuge T. Adjuvant treatments for resectable pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008; 15 (05) 468-472
- 2 Loos M, Kleeff J, Friess H, Büchler MW. Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1138: 169-180
- 3 Czito BG, Willett CG, Clark JW, Fernandez Del Castillo C. Current perspectives on locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 2000; 14 (11) 1535-1545 , discussion 1546, 1549–1552
- 4 Willett CG, Czito BG, Bendell JC, Ryan DP. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 (20) 4538-4544
- 5 Prokesch RW, Chow LC, Beaulieu CF, Bammer R, Jeffrey Jr RB. Isoattenuating pancreatic adenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs. Radiology 2002; 224 (03) 764-768
- 6 Zakharova OP, Karmazanovsky GG, Egorov VI. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Outstanding problems. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 4 (05) 104-113
- 7 Bond-Smith G, Banga N, Hammond TM, Imber CJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BMJ 2012; 344 (344) e2476
- 8 Schneeweiß S, Horger M, Grözinger A. et al. CT-perfusion measurements in pancreatic carcinoma with different kinetic models: Is there a chance for tumour grading based on functional parameters?. Cancer Imaging 2016; 16 (01) 43
- 9 Delrue L, Blanckaert P, Mertens D, Van Meerbeeck S, Ceelen W, Duyck P. Tissue perfusion in pathologies of the pancreas: assessment using 128-slice computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 2012; 37 (04) 595-601
- 10 Hartwig W, Schneider L, Diener MK, Bergmann F, Büchler MW, Werner J. Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 2009; 96 (01) 5-20
- 11 Yadav AK, Sharma R, Kandasamy D. et al. Perfusion CT - Can it resolve the pancreatic carcinoma versus mass forming chronic pancreatitis conundrum?. Pancreatology 2016; 16 (06) 979-987
- 12 Miles KA, Charnsangavej C, Lee FT, Fishman EK, Horton K, Lee TY. Application of CT in the investigation of angiogenesis in oncology. Acad Radiol 2000; 7 (10) 840-850
- 13 Mazzei FG, Mazzei MA, Cioffi Squitieri N. et al. CT perfusion in the characterization of renal lesions: an added value to multiphasic CT. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 10
- 14 D'Onofrio M, Gallotti A, Mantovani W. et al. Perfusion CT can predict tumoral grading of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (02) 227-233
- 15 Yadav AK, Nadarajah J, Kandasamy D, Sharma R, Gamanagatti S, Garg PK. Volume perfusion computed tomography as an aid to diagnosis of pancreatic tuberculosis. Trop Gastroenterol 2014; 35 (04) 264-266
- 16 Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV. Body perfusion CT: technique, clinical applications, and advances. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47 (01) 161-178
- 17 Tsuji Y, Yamamoto H, Yazumi S. et al. Perfusion computerized tomography can predict pancreatic necrosis in early stages of severe acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5 (12) 1484-1492
- 18 Tsuji Y, Hamaguchi K, Watanabe Y. et al. Perfusion CT is superior to angiography in predicting pancreatic necrosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45 (11) 1155-1162
- 19 Yadav AK, Sharma R, Kandasamy D. et al. Perfusion CT: can it predict the development of pancreatic necrosis in early stage of severe acute pancreatitis?. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40 (03) 488-499
- 20 Miura F, Takada T, Amano H, Yoshida M, Furui S, Takeshita K. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2006; 8 (05) 337-342
- 21 Xu J, Liang Z, Hao S. et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: dynamic 64-slice helical CT with perfusion imaging. Abdom Imaging 2009; 34 (06) 759-766
- 22 Kandel S, Kloeters C, Meyer H, Hein P, Hilbig A, Rogalla P. Whole-organ perfusion of the pancreas using dynamic volume CT in patients with primary pancreas carcinoma: acquisition technique, post-processing and initial results. Eur Radiol 2009; 19 (11) 2641-2646
- 23 Lu N, Guo QY, Ren Y, Bi CL, Chen LY. The value of 64 slices CT perfusion in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J China Clin Med Imaging 2007; 18: 554-558
- 24 Ye R, Guo SL, Zhou HQ. et al. Study of 64 slices CT perfusion imaging in pancreatic cancer. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 2007; 23: 1362-1365
- 25 Zhao XM, Zhou CW, Wu N. et al. Study of multiple slices pancreatic CT perfusion. Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi 2003; 37: 845-849
- 26 Liang ZH, Feng XY, Zhu RJ, Jin C. Study of multiple slices CT perfusion imaging in normal pancreas. Shengwu Yixue Gongcheng Yu Linchuang 2006; 10: 218-222
- 27 Klauss M, Stiller W, Fritz F. et al. Computed tomography perfusion analysis of pancreatic carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012; 36 (02) 237-242
- 28 Klauss M, Stiller W, Pahn G. et al. Dual-energy perfusion-CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (02) 208-214
- 29 Prokesch RW, Schima W, Chow LC, Jeffrey RB. Multidetector CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: diagnostic advances and therapeutic relevance. Eur Radiol 2003; 13 (09) 2147-2154
- 30 Wittkamp G, Buerke B, Dziewas R. et al. Whole brain perfused blood volume CT: visualization of infarcted tissue compared to quantitative perfusion CT. Acad Radiol 2010; 17 (04) 427-432
- 31 Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH. et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 197 (02) 381-385
- 32 Zaborienė I, Barauskas G, Gulbinas A, Ignatavičius P, Lukoševičius S, Žvinienė K. Dynamic perfusion CT - a promising tool to diagnose pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Open Med (Wars) 2021; 16 (01) 284-292
- 33 Eastwood JD, Lev MH, Provenzale JM. Perfusion CT with iodinated contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180 (01) 3-12
- 34 Cáceres AV, Zwingenberger AL, Hardam E, Lucena JM, Schwarz T. Helical computed tomographic angiography of the normal canine pancreas. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47 (03) 270-278
- 35 Lu N, Feng XY, Hao SJ. et al. 64-slice CT perfusion imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. Acad Radiol 2011; 18 (01) 81-88
- 36 Mirecka J, Libura J, Libura M. et al. Morphological parameters of the angiogenic response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma – correlation with histological grading and clinical data. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2001; 39 (04) 335-340
- 37 Purdie TG, Henderson E, Lee TY. Functional CT imaging of angiogenesis in rabbit VX2 soft-tissue tumour. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46 (12) 3161-3175
- 38 Linder S, Blåsjö M, von Rosen A, Parrado C, Falkmer UG, Falkmer S. Pattern of distribution and prognostic value of angiogenesis in pancreatic duct carcinoma: a semiquantitative immunohistochemical study of 45 patients. Pancreas 2001; 22 (03) 240-247