Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1811202
Evaluating the Oral Wound Healing Properties and Antimicrobial Efficacy of Sulfonated Shrimp Chitosan

Abstract
Objective
This study evaluated the oral wound healing efficacy and fibroblast proliferation induced by sulfonated Vannamei shrimp chitosan, compared with commercial chitosan. Additionally, its antimicrobial activity against oral microorganism Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Porphyromonas gingivalis was assessed.
Materials and Methods
In the wound healing study, three groups of rats were treated with Aquades (negative control), commercial chitosan (positive control), and sulfonated shrimp chitosan, with healing time and fibroblast proliferation measured. The antimicrobial study tested different concentrations (1, 3, 5, and 7%) using a disk diffusion method.
Results
Sulfonated shrimp chitosan showed the fastest wound healing (5 ± 0.47 days) compared with commercial chitosan (6 ± 0.0 days) and Aquades (6.6 ± 0.6 days) (p = 0.036), and significantly higher fibroblast counts (20.32 ± 0.688, p < 0.001). Antimicrobial activity was moderate, with the highest inhibition at 3 or 5%. The ANOVA (analysis of variance) test was used for hypothesis testing with the significance level at p <0.05, followed by a Kruskal–Wallis test.
Discussion
Sulfonated chitosan demonstrated superior wound healing properties, consistent with studies showing enhanced tissue regeneration by sulfonated chitosan derivatives. Antimicrobial effects were moderate, with peak activity at intermediate concentrations and a decrease at 7%, possibly due to a saturation effect.
Conclusion
These findings suggest sulfonated shrimp chitosan could be a promising agent in wound healing and infection control.
Publication History
Article published online:
08 September 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Schultz GS, Chin GA, Moldawer L. et al Principles of wound healing. In: Fitridge R, Thompson M. eds Mechanisms of Vascular Disease: A Reference Book for Vascular Specialists [Internet]. Adelaide (AU): University of Adelaide Press; 2011: 423-450
- 2 Nordini W, Wan H, Razak FA. et al. Oral microbes and its environment: a review article. Acad J 2013; 9 (02) 67-75
- 3 Chen W, Jiang Q, Yan G, Yang D. The oral microbiome and salivary proteins influence caries in children aged 6 to 8 years. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20 (01) 295
- 4 Lynge Pedersen AM, Belstrøm D. The role of natural salivary defences in maintaining a healthy oral microbiota. J Dent 2019; 80 (Suppl. 01) S3-S12
- 5 Hakim RF, Rezeki FS, Sari LM. et al. Hemostatic and wound healing effects of gracilaria verrucosa extract gel in albino rats. Trop J Nat Prod Res 2020; 4 (11) 912-917
- 6 Seyednejad H, Imani M, Jamieson T, Seifalian AM. Topical haemostatic agents. Br J Surg 2008; 95 (10) 1197-1225
- 7 Chandumpai A, Singhpibulporn N, Faroongsarng D. Preparation and physico-chemical characterization of chitin and chitosan from the pens of the squid species, Loligo lessoniana and Loligo formosana. Carbohydr Polym 2004; 58 (04) 467-474
- 8 Palpandi C, Shanmugam V, Shanmugam A. Extraction of chitin and chitosan from shell and operculum of mangrove gastropod Nerita (Dostia) crepidularia Lamarck. Int J Med Med Sci 2009; 1 (05) 198-205
- 9 Khan MA, Mujahid M. A review on recent advances in chitosan based composite for hemostatic dressings. Int J Biol Macromol 2019; 124 (124) 138-147
- 10 Wang K, Pan S, Qi Z. et al. Recent advances in chitosan-based metal nanocomposites for wound healing applications. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2020; 827912: 1-13
- 11 Kmiec MP. Chitosan-properties and applications in dentistry. Adv Tissue Eng Regen Med Open Access 2017; 2 (04) 205-211
- 12 Suherman S, Latif M, Rosmala Dewi ST. Potential of chitosan from whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) shell as antibacterial against Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Propionibacterium acnes, and Escherichia coli using paper disc diffusion method. Media Farm 2018; 14: 132
- 13 Varun TK, Senani S, Jayapal N. et al. Extraction of chitosan and its oligomers from shrimp shell waste, their characterization and antimicrobial effect. Vet World 2017; 10 (02) 170-175
- 14 Eamrat R, Rujakom S, Pussayanavin T. et al. Optimizing biocoagulant aid from shrimp shells (Litopenaeus vannamei) for enhancing microplastics removal from aqueous solutions. Environ Technol Innov 2024; 33 (04) 103457
- 15 Hakim RF, Dinni F. Effect of Carica papaya extract toward incised wound healing process in mice (Mus musculus) clinically and histologically. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2019; 2019: 8306519
- 16 Ibitoye EB, Lokman IH, Hezmee MNM, Goh YM, Zuki ABZ, Jimoh AA. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of chitin and chitosan isolated from house cricket. Biomed Mater 2018; 13 (02) 025009
- 17 Pellis A, Guebitz GM, Nyanhongo GS. Chitosan: sources, processing and modification techniques. Gels 2022; 8 (07) 5-25
- 18 Ben Amor I, Hemmami H, Laouini SE. et al. Influence of chitosan source and degree of deacetylation on antibacterial activity and adsorption of AZO dye from water. Biomass Convers Biorefin 2024; 14: 16245-16255
- 19 Rajinikanth B S, Rajkumar DSR, K K, Vijayaragavan V. Chitosan-based biomaterial in wound healing: a review. Cureus 2024; 16 (02) e55193
- 20 Valian A, Goudarzi H, Nasiri MJ. et al. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm effects of chitosan nanoparticles on Streptococcus mutans isolates. J Iran Med Counc 2023; 6 (02) 292-298
- 21 Ke CL, Deng FS, Chuang CY, Lin CH. Antimicrobial actions and applications of Chitosan. Polymers (Basel) 2021; 13 (06) 904
- 22 Mania S, Banach-Kopeć A, Staszczyk K, Kulesza J, Augustin E, Tylingo R. An influence of molecular weight, deacetylation degree of chitosan xerogels on their antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity. Comparison of chitosan materials obtained using lactic acid and CO2 saturation. Carbohydr Res 2023; 534: 108973
- 23 Nur N, Windari R, Fauziah SI. et al. Biobactericide chitosan blood shell as an anti bacterial Ralstonia solanacearum. Proceed Biol Educ Conf 2019; 16 (01) 280-284
- 24 Wassel MO, Khattab MA. Antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and inhibition of bacterial induced enamel demineralization of propolis, miswak, and chitosan nanoparticles based dental varnishes. J Adv Res 2017; 8 (04) 387-392
- 25 de Oliveira Mde FAG, Peixoto CA, Amorim RV da S. Ultrastructural Analysis of Chitosan Antibacterial Activity against Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Adv Microbiol 2019; 09 (10) 893-903
- 26 Kamalou AM, Sayar F, Iranpour B. Effect of antibacterial photodynamic therapy with chitosan nanoparticles on Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2024; 45: 103996
- 27 Natesan S, Krishnaswami V, Veedu ST, Mohanan DP, Ruckmani K, Palanichamy R. Chitosan-based ocular drug delivery systems. In: Natesan S, Viswanad V. eds. Chitosan-Based Drug Delivery Systems. Singapore: Springer; 2019: 107-134
- 28 Poojar B, Ommurugan B, Adiga S. et al. Methodology used in the study. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2017; 7 (10) 1-5
- 29 Yao R, Davidson DD, Lopez-Beltran A, MacLennan GT, Montironi R, Cheng L. The S100 proteins for screening and prognostic grading of bladder cancer. Histol Histopathol 2007; 22 (09) 1025-1032
- 30 Landén NX, Li D, Ståhle M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci 2016; 73 (20) 3861-3885