Endoscopic Diskectomy in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Athletes are at increased risk of lumbar disk herniation due to degenerative and traumatic factors. Prior studies have evaluated the efficacy of traditional open diskectomy in athletes; however, there is limited evidence regarding the utility of endoscopic diskectomy for athletes recovering from lumbar disk herniations. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic diskectomy in athletes with lumbar disk herniation, focusing on return to play and pain outcomes. Studies on athletes with lumbar disk herniation who underwent endoscopic diskectomy were included. Case reports and case series with fewer than 10 patients were excluded. PubMed-Medline and Ovid-Medline databases were searched, with the last search conducted in May 2024. Quality assessment/risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool for non-comparative studies. Data were synthesized using a random effects model. Meta-analyses were conducted using R software (R Core Team, 2024). Four studies with a total of 119 athletes were included. The combined return to play rate was 96% (95% CI: 90–100%), with a mean return to play time of 8.25 weeks (95% CI: 6.51–10.46 weeks). The mean differences in leg and back VAS were −68.83 (95% CI: −102.05 to −35.61) and −68.42 (95% CI: −101.45 to −35.40), respectively. Endoscopic diskectomy in athletes is associated with high return to play rates and significant pain reduction. Future studies that stratify outcomes based on the level of competition and specific endoscopic diskectomy technique are needed to fully assess the utility of endoscopic diskectomy in athletes.

Keywords

endoscopic diskectomy - percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy - microendoscopic diskectomy - athletes - return to play

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Oktober 2025

• References

• 1 Baker RJ, Patel D. Lower back pain in the athlete: common conditions and treatment. Prim Care 2005; 32 (01) 201-229
• 2 Triantafillou KM, Lauerman W, Kalantar SB. Degenerative disease of the cervical spine and its relationship to athletes. Clin Sports Med 2012; 31 (03) 509-520
• 3 Mundt DJ, Kelsey JL, Golden AL. et al; The Northeast Collaborative Group on Low Back Pain. An epidemiologic study of sports and weight lifting as possible risk factors for herniated lumbar and cervical discs. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (06) 854-860
• 4 Yamaguchi JT, Hsu WK. Intervertebral disc herniation in elite athletes. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (04) 833-840
• 5 Hsu WK, McCarthy KJ, Savage JW. et al. The Professional Athlete Spine Initiative: outcomes after lumbar disc herniation in 342 elite professional athletes. Spine J 2011; 11 (03) 180-186
• 6 Nair R, Kahlenberg CA, Hsu WK. Outcomes of lumbar discectomy in elite athletes: the need for high-level evidence. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (06) 1971-1977
• 7 Smith N, Masters J, Jensen C, Khan A, Sprowson A. Systematic review of microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 (11) 2458-2465
• 8 Akinduro OO, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA. et al. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for extraforaminal lumbar disk herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2017; 108: 924-938.e3
• 9 Qin R, Liu B, Hao J. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus posterior open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systemic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018; 120: 352-362
• 10 Ruan W, Feng F, Liu Z, Xie J, Cai L, Ping A. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2016; 31: 86-92
• 11 Chang X, Chen B, Li HY, Han XB, Zhou Y, Li CQ. The safety and efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (06) 1225-1234
• 12 Kanno H, Aizawa T, Hahimoto K, Itoi E. Minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: current concepts, surgical techniques, and outcomes. Int Orthop 2019; 43 (04) 917-922
• 13 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71
• 14 Yamaya S, Okada Y, Higashino K. et al. Early outcomes of transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for high school athletes with herniated nucleus pulposus of the lumbar spine. J Pediatr Orthop B 2020; 29 (06) 599-606
• 15 Kapetanakis S, Gkantsinikoudis N, Charitoudis G. Implementation of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in competitive elite athletes with lumbar disc herniation: original study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49 (12) 3234-3241
• 16 Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, Ida K, Tanimoto K, Yamashita T. Microendoscopic discectomy in athletes. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18 (06) 902-908
• 17 Nakamae T, Fujimoto Y, Yamada K. et al. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in athletes under the local anesthesia. J Orthop Sci 2019; 24 (06) 1015-1019
• 18 Schick U, Döhnert J, Richter A, König A, Vitzthum HE. Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study. Eur Spine J 2002; 11 (01) 20-26
• 19 Pan L, Zhang P, Yin Q. Comparison of tissue damages caused by endoscopic lumbar discectomy and traditional lumbar discectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg 2014; 12 (05) 534-537