Neuropediatrics 2025; 56(S 01): S1-S24
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1812161
Varia

Efficacy and Safety of Trofinetide for the Treatment of Rett Syndrome: Results from the Pivotal Phase 3 LAVENDER Study

Authors

  • A. Huber

    1   Acadia Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Medical Affairs, Basel, Switzerland
  • J. Neul

    2   Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • A. Percy

    3   University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • T. Benke

    4   Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States
  • E. Berry-Kravis

    5   Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • D. Glaze

    6   Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States
  • E. Marsh

    7   Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • K. Bishop

    8   Acadia Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California, United States
  • J. Youakim

    8   Acadia Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California, United States
 

Background/Purpose: Rett syndrome (RTT) is a debilitating genetic neurodevelopmental disorder primarily affecting females. Trofinetide is a synthetic analog of glycine–proline–glutamate, a naturally occurring tripeptide cleaved from insulin-like growth factor 1. Phase 2 studies in RTT demonstrated a clinical benefit over placebo in clinician- and caregiver-assessed efficacy measures. Here, we present the results of LAVENDER, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of trofinetide in girls and young women with RTT.

Methods: Females with RTT, aged 5 to 20 years, were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily oral trofinetide or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included the Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ), a caregiver assessment of core RTT symptoms (co-primary), the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale (co-primary), and the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist-Social (CSBS-DP-IT Social) composite score (key secondary).

Results: Overall, 187 participants were randomized to trofinetide (n = 93) or placebo (n = 94). After 12 weeks of treatment, trofinetide demonstrated a statistically significant improvement over placebo for co-primary and key secondary endpoints. Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline to week 12 in the RSBQ for trofinetide versus placebo was −4.9 versus −1.7 (p = 0.0175; Cohen's d effect size = 0.37), LS mean CGI-I score at week 12 was 3.5 versus 3.8 (p = 0.0030; Cohens’ d effect size = 0.47), and LS mean change from baseline to week 12 in the CSBS-DP-IT Social composite score was −0.1 versus −1.1 (p = 0.0064; Cohen's d effect size = 0.43). Serious adverse events were reported in 3.2% of participants in the trofinetide and placebo groups. The most common adverse event in the trofinetide and placebo groups was diarrhea (80.6 and 19.1%, respectively), with 98% of all cases experiencing mild-to moderate severity.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that trofinetide is efficacious and has an acceptable safety profile in females with RTT.



Publication History

Article published online:
26 September 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany