Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1812846
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Electrocorticography During Epilepsy Surgery under Isoflurane or Propofol Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
Authors
Abstract
Objectives
Avoiding or minimizing the interference of anesthetic agents with electrocorticography (ECoG) signals during ECoG-guided epilepsy surgery is vital to the successful resection of the epileptogenic area. Most agents in routine use have widely variable effects like suppression, enhancement, or no impact on the ECoG signals. Dexmedetomidine is reported to have no influence, or minimal depressant effect, on the signals, but studies evaluating its effect on intraoperative ECoG are limited. This study evaluates the effect of dexmedetomidine on ECoG signals during ECoG-guided epilepsy surgeries conducted under either isoflurane-based or propofol-based anesthesia regimens. It also assesses the safety of dexmedetomidine use in these combination forms by determining its impact on hemodynamic parameters, recovery from anesthesia, and incidence of intraoperative awareness.
Materials and Methods
Thirty epilepsy patients, randomized into Group-I (dexmedetomidine-isoflurane, n = 15) and Group-P (dexmedetomidine-propofol, n = 15), underwent ECoG-guided epilepsy surgeries. After dural reflection, dexmedetomidine was administered as a bolus of 1 μg/kg, and ECoG signals were recorded before and after the bolus via brain surface grids. Dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h was thereafter continued throughout surgery in both groups. The effect of dexmedetomidine on ECoG scores, hemodynamic parameters, anesthesia emergence times, and incidence of intraoperative awareness was evaluated in both groups and compared.
Results
Dexmedetomidine did not cause ECoG suppression when administered with either propofol or isoflurane anesthesia. However, it caused a significant increase in the ECoG score in Group-I (baseline: 1.8 ± 0.7; post-dexmedetomidine: 2.1 ± 0.9; p = 0.02), while there was no change in scores in Group-P (baseline: 2.0 ± 0.7; post-dexmedetomidine: 2.10 ± 0.7; p = 0.16). The anesthesia emergence time was within defined normal limits in both groups; however, in Group-I, it was significantly longer than that in Group-P (p = 0.03). The hemodynamic parameters were not affected by dexmedetomidine, and there was no incidence of awareness in both groups.
Conclusion
Dexmedetomidine, when used with propofol anesthesia, had no effect on the intraoperative ECoG signals, hemodynamic parameters, and anesthesia recovery time. Use of dexmedetomidine with isoflurane anesthesia also did not cause ECoG suppression, but significantly augmented the ECoG scores, while normal hemodynamic and recovery status were maintained. There was no incident of intraoperative awareness in either group. As per this study, the dexmedetomidine-propofol anesthetic regimen appears to be suitable for use in ECoG-guided epilepsy surgeries. However, the ECoG-enhancing effect observed with dexmedetomidine when used with isoflurane necessitates further research for validation and to understand its clinical implications.
Keywords
epilepsy surgery - electrocorticography - dexmedetomidine - isoflurane - propofol - anesthesiaPublication History
Article published online:
19 November 2025
© 2025. Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Roessler K, Heynold E, Buchfelder M, Stefan H, Hamer HM. Current value of intraoperative electrocorticography (iopECoG). Epilepsy Behav 2019; 91: 20-24
- 2 Bindra A, Chouhan RS, Prabhakar H, Dash HH, Chandra PS, Tripathi M. Comparison of the effects of different anesthetic techniques on electrocorticography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery - a bispectral index guided study. Seizure 2012; 21 (07) 501-507
- 3 Chui J, Manninen P, Valiante T, Venkatraghavan L. The anesthetic considerations of intraoperative electrocorticography during epilepsy surgery. Anesth Analg 2013; 117 (02) 479-486
- 4 Kacar Bayram A, Yan Q, Isitan C, Rao S, Spencer DD, Alkawadri R. Effect of anesthesia on electrocorticography for localization of epileptic focus: literature review and future directions. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 118: 107902
- 5 Hisada K, Morioka T, Fukui K. et al. Effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on electrocorticographic activities in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2001; 13 (04) 333-337
- 6 Schneider F, Herzer W, Schroeder HW. et al. Effects of propofol on electrocorticography in patients with intractable partial epilepsy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2011; 23 (02) 150-155
- 7 Souter MJ, Rozet I, Ojemann JG. et al. Dexmedetomidine sedation during awake craniotomy for seizure resection: effects on electrocorticography. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2007; 19 (01) 38-44
- 8 Pacreu S, Vilà E, Moltó L, Bande D, Rueda M, Fernández Candil JL. Anaesthesia management in epilepsy surgery with intraoperative electrocorticography. Manejo anestésico en la cirugía de epilepsia con electrocorticografía intraoperatoria. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) 2018; 65 (02) 108-111
- 9 Mei HA, Ho DN. Intraoperative awareness in epileptic patients during cerebral cortex electroencephalography measurement under general anesthesia. J Dalian Med Univ 2013; 35 (01) 61-64
- 10 Sandhu K, Dash H. Awareness during anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2009; 53 (02) 148-157
- 11 Oda Y, Toriyama S, Tanaka K. et al. The effect of dexmedetomidine on electrocorticography in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2007; 105 (05) 1272-1277
- 12 Chaitanya G, Arivazhagan A, Sinha S. et al. Dexmedetomidine anesthesia enhances spike generation during intra-operative electrocorticography: a promising adjunct for epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Res 2015; 109: 65-71
- 13 Talke P, Stapelfeldt C, Garcia P. Dexmedetomidine does not reduce epileptiform discharges in adults with epilepsy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2007; 19 (03) 195-199
- 14 Cascella M, Bimonte S, Di Napoli R. Delayed emergence from anesthesia: what we know and how we act. Local Reg Anesth 2020; 13: 195-206
- 15 Moonesinghe SR, Walker EM, Bell M. SNAP-1 Investigator Group. Design and methodology of SNAP-1: a Sprint National Anaesthesia Project to measure patient reported outcome after anaesthesia. Perioper Med (Lond) 2015; 4: 4
- 16 Mathern GW, Cepeda C, Hurst RS, Flores-Hernandez J, Mendoza D, Levine MS. Neurons recorded from pediatric epilepsy surgery patients with cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia 2000; 41 (Suppl. 06) S162-S167
- 17 Nicolas B, Patrick R. Supratentorial masses: anesthetic considerations. In: Cottrell JE, Young WJ. eds. Cottrell and Young's Neuroanesthesia. 5th ed.. Mosby; 2010: 184-202
- 18 Bortel A, Yao ZS, Shmuel A. A rat model of somatosensory-evoked reflex seizures induced by peripheral stimulation. Epilepsy Res 2019; 157: 106209
- 19 Yavuz M, İyiköşker P, Mutlu N. et al. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2A receptor agonist, triggers seizures unilaterally in GAERS during the pre-epileptic phase: Does the onset of spike-and-wave discharges occur in a focal manner?. Front Neurol 2023; 14: 1231736
- 20 Mason KP, O'Mahony E, Zurakowski D, Libenson MH. Effects of dexmedetomidine sedation on the EEG in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2009; 19 (12) 1175-1183
- 21 Kirchberger K, Schmitt H, Hummel C. et al. Clonidine and methohexital-induced epileptic magnetoencephalographic discharges in patients with focal epilepsies. Epilepsia 1998; 39 (08) 841-849
- 22 Miyazaki Y, Adachi T, Kurata J, Utsumi J, Shichino T, Segawa H. Dexmedetomidine reduces seizure threshold during enflurane anaesthesia in cats. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82 (06) 935-937
- 23 Mirski MA, Rossell LA, McPherson RW, Traystman RJ. Dexmedetomidine decreases seizure threshold in a rat model of experimental generalized epilepsy. Anesthesiology 1994; 81 (06) 1422-1428
- 24 Kubota T, Fukasawa T, Kitamura E. et al. Epileptic seizures induced by dexmedetomidine in a neonate. Brain Dev 2013; 35 (04) 360-362
- 25 Watts AD, Herrick IA, McLachlan RS, Craen RA, Gelb AW. The effect of sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia on interictal spike activity among patients with refractory epilepsy. Anesth Analg 1999; 89 (05) 1275-1281
- 26 Chaitanya G, Arivazhagan A, Sinha S. et al. Hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine during intra-operative electrocorticography for epilepsy surgery. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2014; 5 (Suppl. 01) S17-S21
- 27 Ittichaikulthol W, Pausawasdi S, Srichintai P, Sarnvivad P. Propofol vs isoflurane for neurosurgical anesthesia in Thai patients. J Med Assoc Thai 1997; 80 (07) 454-460
- 28 Prabhakar H, Singh GP, Mahajan C, Kapoor I, Kalaivani M, Anand V. Intravenous versus inhalational techniques for rapid emergence from anaesthesia in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9 (09) CD010467
- 29 Miura Y, Kamiya K, Kanazawa K. et al. Superior recovery profiles of propofol-based regimen as compared to isoflurane-based regimen in patients undergoing craniotomy for primary brain tumor excision: a retrospective study. J Anesth 2012; 26 (05) 721-727
