Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 1999; 20(8): 532-537
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-8839
Training and Testing
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Measurement of Maximal Power Output in Isokinetic and Non-Isokinetic Cycling. A Comparison of Two Methods

 R. Baron1 ,  N. Bachl2 ,  R. Petschnig3 ,  H. Tschan2 ,  G. Smekal2 ,  R. Pokan2
  • 1 Institute of Sports Science, Department of Prevention and Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria
  • 2 Institute of Sports Science, Department of Exercise Physiology, University of Vienna, Austria
  • 3 Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Donau Hospital, Vienna, Austria
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

The main goal of the study was to compare maximal power output and power output at different pedalling frequencies obtained during isokinetic all-out tests with maximal power output obtained during a single all-out sprint (against the same braking force for every subject). Sixty healthy male subjects participated in the study. The ergometer system used in this study has three operating modes: the isokinetic mode (maintaining pedal crank velocity constant at a present level), a revolution dependent mode and a revolution independent mode. In all three operating modes the effective forces are monitored by means of strain gauge. All subjects performed a single all-out sprint against a braking force of 20 Newton and an all-out isokinetic cycling test consisting of ten 10 s bouts of maximal cycling at speeds ranging from 50 rpm to 140 rpm. In both tests, irrespective of which test mode was used, the mean power for a complete crank revolution showed parabolic relationships to crank velocity. For the isokinetic test, the subjects showed a peak power (IsoWpeak) of 15.3 ± 1.7 W/kg corresponding to an optimal velocity of 115 ± 8.6 rpm. For the force-velocity test NonisoWpeak (the highest power obtained at any time during the test) was 14.4 ± 1.9 W/kg and was achieved at a pedalling rate of 127 ± 14 rpm. IsoWpeak was significantly higher than NonisoWpeak (p < 0.001) but there were no significant differences between NonisoWpeak and IsoWmax (maximal mean power for each full crank revolution) for the revolutions from 90 rpm to 140 rpm. Though, NonisoWpeak and IsoWpeak are significantly different, there was a strong relationship between NonisoWpeak and IsoWpeak (r = 0.7158, p < 0.001). There was also a strong relationship between NonisoWpeak and IsoWmax for the revolutions from 50 rpm to 120 rpm (p < 0.001) and at 130 rpm (p < 0.01).

Key words:

Isokinetic cycling - force-velocity test - optimal velocity - maximal power - limb symmetry-index

References

  • 1 Ayalon A, Inbar O, Bar-Or O. Relationships among measurements of explosive strength and anaerobic power. In: Nelson RC, Morehouse CA (eds) International Series on Sport Sciences 1: Biomechanical IV. Baltimore; University Press 1974: 572-577
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Baron R, Bachl N, Petschnig R, Tschan H. The constant velocity translatoric dynamo ergometer.  Int J Sports Med. 1994;  15 38-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Baron R. Normative data for muscle strength in relation to age, knee angle and velocity.  Wien Med Wochenschr. 1995;  145 600-605
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Beelen A, Sargeant A J. Effect of fatigue on maximal power output at different contraction velocities in humans.  J Appl Physiol. 1991;  71 2332-2337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Beelen A, Sargeant A J. Effect of prior exercise at different pedalling frequencies on maximal power in humans.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1993;  66 102-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi P V. A simple method fot measurement of mechanical power in jumping.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1983;  50 273-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Butelli O, Seck D, Vandewalle H, Jouanin J C, Monod H. Effect of fatigue on maximal velocity and maximal torque during short exhausting cycling.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1996;  73 175-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cunningham D A, Faulkner J A. The effect of training on aerobic and anaerobic metabolism during a short exhaustive run.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1969;  1 65-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Davies C TM, Young K. Effects of external loading on short term power output in children and young male adults.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1984;  52 351-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dotan R, Bar-Or O. Load optimization for the Wingate anaerobic test.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1983;  51 409-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hautier C A, Linossier M T, Belli A, Lacour J R, Arsac L M. Optimal velocity for maximal power production in non-isokinetic cycling is related to muscle fiber type composition.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1996;  74 114-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Jones N L, Mc Cartney N, Graham T, Spriet L L, Kowalchuk J M, Heigenhauser G JF, Sutton J R. Muscle performance and metabolism in maximal isokinetic cycling at slow and fast speeds.  J Appl Physiol. 1985;  59 132-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kannus P. Isokinetic evaluation of muscular performance.  Int J Sports Med. 1994;  15 11-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Katch V L, Weltman A, Martin R, Gray L. Optimal test characteristics for maximal anaerobic work on the bicycle ergometer.  Res Quart. 1977;  48 319-327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kues J M, Rothstein J M, Lamb R L. Obtaining reliable measurements of knee extensor torque produced during maximal voluntary contractions.  Phys Ther. 1992;  72 492-504
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lakomy H KA. Measurement of work and power output using friction-loaded cycle ergometers.  Ergonomics. 1986;  29 509-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Linossier M T, Dormois D, Fouquet R, Geyssant A, Denis C. Use of the force-velocity test to determine the optimal braking force for a sprint exercise on a friction-loaded cycle ergometer.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1996;  74 420-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Margaria R, Aghemo P, Rovelli E. Measurement of muscular power (anaerobic) in man.  J Appl Physiol. 1966;  2 1662-1664
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Martin C M, Wagner B M, Coyle E F. Inertial-load method determines maximal cycling power in a single exercise bout.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;  29 1505-1512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Matheny F. Finding perfect saddle height.  Bicycling Magazine. 1992;  12 46-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mc Cartney N, Heigenhauser G JF, Jones N L. Effects of pH on maximal power output and fatigue during short-term dynamic exercise.  J Appl Physiol Respirat Environ Exercise Physiol. 1983;  55 225-229
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mc Cartney N, Heigenhauser G JF, Jones N L. Power output and fatigue of human muscle in maximal cycling exercise.  J Appl Physiol Respirat Environ Exercise Physiol. 1983;  55 218-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mc Cartney N, Heigenhauser G JF, Sargeant A J, Jones N L. A constant-velocity cycle ergometer for the study of dynamic muscle function.  J Appl Physiol Respirat Environ Exercise Physiol. 1983;  55 212-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mc Cartney N, Obminski G, Heigenhauser G JF. Torque-velocity relationship in isokinetic cycling exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1985;  58 1459-1462
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mc Cartney N, Spriet L L, Heigenhauser G JF, Kowalchuk J M, Sutton J R, Jones N L. Muscle power and metabolism in maximal intermittent exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1986;  60 1164-1169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Petschnig R, Baron R, Albrecht M. The relationship between isokinetic quadriceps strength test and hop tests for distance and one-legged vertical jump test followed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;  28 23-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pirnay F, Crielaard J M. Mesure de la puissance anaerobic alactique.  Medecine de Sport. 1979;  53 13-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sapega A A, Nicholas J A, Sokolow D, Saraniti A. The nature of torque “overshoot” in Cybex isokinetic dynamometry.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 368-375
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sargeant A J, Dolan P, Young A. Optimal velocity for short-term (anaerobic) power output in cycling.  Int J Sports Med. 1984;  5 124-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sargeant A J, Hoinville E, Young A. Maximum leg force and power output during short-term dynamic exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1981;  51 1175-1182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sargeant A J. Human power output and muscle fatigue.  Int J Sports Med. 1994;  15 116-121
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Seck D, Vandewalle H, Decrops N, Monod H. Maximal power and torque-velocity relationship on a cycle ergometer during the acceleration phase of a single all-out exercise.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1995;  70 161-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Thorstensson A, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Force-velocity relationships and fiber composition in human extensor muscles.  J Appl Physiol. 1976;  40 12-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tkac M, Hamar D, Komadel L, Kuthmanova O. Measurement of anaerobic power on the lower limbs by a method of repeated vertical jumps.  Sports Training Med Rehabil. 1990;  1 317-325
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Monod H. All out anaerobic capacity tests on cycle ergometers.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1985;  54 222-229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

R. Baron

Institute of Sports Science Department of Prevention and Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine University of Vienna

Auf der Schmelz

A-1150 Vienna

Austria

Phone: +43 (1) 9822661/174

Fax: +43 (1) 9822661/198

Email: ramon.baron@univie.ac.at

      >