Facial Nerve Grading Systems

ABSTRACT

Clinicians require a reliable and sensitive facial grading system to determine the status of facial nerve function postinjury as well as to evaluate the efficacy of treatment outcomes. The method of assessment should be easy to administer, reproducible, clinically relevant, and require little time and expense. The grading system should be sufficiently sensitive to detect changes over time or following treatment. The lack of a universally accepted grading system frequently does not allow meaningful comparison when assessing the effectiveness of treatment protocols for facial nerve injury. The aim of this article is to review most of the previously published facial grading systems. It is our contention that a grading system developed and currently used within our institution appropriately addresses the needs as well as many of the deficiencies of most other grading systems.

KEYWORD

Facial grading system - HB-FGS - BF-LMI - Nottingham - DEFS - S-FGS

REFERENCES

• 1 House J W. Facial nerve grading systems.  Laryngoscope . 1983;  93 1056-1069
• 2 Botman J WM, Jongkees L BW. The results of intratemporal treatment of facial palsy.  Pract Otorhinolaryngol . 1955;  17 80-100
• 3 May M. Facial paralysis, peripheral type: a proposed method of reporting (emphasis on diagnosis and prognosis, as well as electrical and chorda tympani nerve testing).  Laryngoscope . 1970;  80(3) 331-390
• 4 Peitersen E. Spontaneous course of Bell's palsy. In: Fisch U, eds. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976 Birmingham, AL: Aesculapuis Publishing Co. 1977: 337-343
• 5 Yanagihara N. Grading of facial palsy. In: Fisch U, eds. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976 Birmingham, AL: Aesculapuis Publishing Co. 1977: 533-535
• 6 Adour K K, Swanson Jr J P. Facial paralysis in 403 consecutive patients: emphasis on treatment response in patients with Bell's palsy.  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol . 1971;  75(6) 1284-1301
• 7 Janssen F P. Ouvre de Postoperatieve Facialis-Verlamming. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1963
• 8 Stennert E. Facial nerve paralysis scoring system. In: Fisch U, eds. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery, Zurich, 1976 Birmingham, AL: Aesculapuis Publishing Co. 1977: 543-547
• 9 House J W, Brackmann D E. Facial nerve grading system.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1985;  93 146-147
• 10 Brackmann D E, Barrs D M. Assessing recovery of facial function following acoustic neuroma surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1984;  92(1) 88-93
• 11 Evans R A, Harries M L, Baguley D M, Moffat D A. Reliability of the House and Brackmann grading system for facial palsy.  J Laryngol Otol . 1989;  103(11) 1056
• 12 Rickenmann J, Jaquenod C, Cerenko D, Fisch U. Comparative value of facial nerve grading systems.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1997;  117(4) 322-325
• 13 Carmines E G, Zeller R A. Reliability and valid assessment. In: Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences Beverly Hills and London: Sage 1979: 07-017
• 14 Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.  Biometrics . 1977;  33 159-174
• 15 Ahrens A, Skarada D, Wallace M. Rapid simultaneous comparison system for subjective grading scales for facial paralysis.  Am J Otol . 1999;  20 667-671
• 16 Ross B G, Fradet G, Nedzelski J M. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1996;  114(3) 380-386
• 17 Burres S A, Fisch U. The comparison of facial grading systems.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1986;  112 755-758
• 18 Croxon G, May M, Mester S J. Grading facial nerve function: House-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods.  Am J Otol . 1990;  11(4) 240-246
• 19 Murty G E, Diver J P, Kelly P J. The Nottingham system: objective assessment of facial nerve function in the clinic.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1994;  110(2) 156-161
• 20 Burres S A. The Standards of normal.  Laryngoscope . 1985;  95 708-714
• 21 Sargent E W, Omar A F, Randall S C. Measurement of facial movement with computer software.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1998;  124 313-318
• 22 Fisch U, Dobie R A, Gmur A, Felix H. Intracranial facial nerve anastomosis.  Am J Otol . 1987;  8(1) 23-29
• 23 Fisch U. Surgery for Bell's palsy.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1981;  107 1-11
• 24 Ross B G, Nedzelski J M. Reliability and validity of the Sunnybrook facial grading system: new horizons in facial nerve research and facial expression. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Symposium on the Facial Nerve, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan, April 13-8, 1997: 563-567
• 25 Kayhan F T, Zurakowski D, Rauch S D. Toronto facial grading system: interobserver reliability.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 2000;  122(2) 212-215
• 26 El-Nagger M, Rice B, Oswal V. Life-size photograph transparencies: a method for the photographic detection and documentation of recovery from facial paralysis.  J Laryngol Otol . 1995;  109 748-750
• 27 Smith I M, Murray J AM, Cull R E, Slattery J. A comparison of clinical and photographic methods of observation.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1991;  117 906-909
• 28 Yuen K, Inokuchi I, Maeta M. Evaluation of facial palsy by moire topography index.  Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg . 1997;  117(5) 567-572
• 29 Neely J G, Cheung J Y, Wood M. Computerised quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralysed and synkinetic face.  Am J Otol . 1992;  13(2) 97-107