Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 48(3): 175-182
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9641
Special Report
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Standards and Concepts in Valve Surgery

A report of the task force of European Heart Institute (EHI) of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts and the International Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (ISCTS)F. Unger, W. G. Rainer, D. Horstkotte, P. Ghosh, W. Rutishauser, E. Braunwald, C. DuranC. Olin, D. A. Cooley, E. Bodor, B. Reichart,  R. Schistek, U. v. Oppell, W. Ade, J. Wada
  • European Heart Institute (EHI) of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts and the International Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (ISCTS)
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

1Introduction

With the advent of open heart surgery, it has been possible to actively fight valvular diseases. Before World War II, there were some reports of operations on the heart, but these operations were rare and anecdotal. Closed techniques were performed occasionally in mitral surgery after World War II. After 1952, a major breakthrough occurred with the introduction of artificial valves and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for open heart surgery.

Standards are technical specifications that ensure all procedures are understood and widely accepted. Concepts are abstract ideas or new developments that may become standards if widely accepted. The first artificial valves were designed in the 1950s as ball valves, and later as monoleaflet and bileaflet valves in aortic and mitral positions. Biological valves were developed in the 1960s. Open-valve reconstruction and other techniques were introduced in the late 60s. These techniques were used first for mitral stenosis and later for mitral regurgitation and homografts.

The standard for valve replacement is to use extracorporeal circulation (ECC) with myocardial protection. In most cases, reconstruction of the diseased valve will not result in good long-term results. Therefore, replacement with an artificial valve is preferred. Concomitant bypass surgery as indicated is performed. Device selection remains a challenge and must be tailored to the patient in conjunction with valve surgery. There are concepts in reconstructing the aortic valve as well as in designing new valves.

The management, including diagnostic and postoperative treatment, of patients with valvular diseases is complex. Valve selection can play an important role in the long-term outcome.

The following standards are set for surgeons:

Indication and Postoperative management.

A previous task force of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association [1] gave an excellent basis for classifying and fostering a useful terminology for cardiac surgeons and cardiologists. Demographics, life span, and epidemiologic characteristics of disease have changed globally in the last 30 years. The availability of cardiac surgery worldwide is highly variable and discrepant, with the USA and Europe offering more accessibility to open heart surgery facilities [2].

References

  • 1 Bonow R O, Carabello B. et al . Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valuvlar Heart Disease. ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines.  Circulation.. 1998;  98 1949-84
  • 2 Unger F. Worldwide Survey on Cardiac Interventions 1995.  Cor Europaeum.. 1999;  7 128-46
  • 3 Jamieson W RE, Edwards F H. et al . Risk Stratification for Cardiac Valve Replacement: STS National Cardiac Surgery Database.  Ann Thorac Surg.. 1999;  67 943-51

Annex

Tables
Valve Type Introduced
1. Mechanical valves
Gott leaflet 1963
Hufnagel ball 1963
Magovern-Cromie ball 1963
Kay-Susuki disc 1964
Starr Edwards 1000 ball 1964
Starr Edwards 6000 ball 1964
Kay-Shiley disc 1965
Smeloff Culter ball 1966
Starr Edwards 1200 ball 1966
Starr Edwards 6120 ball 1966
Cross-Jones disc 1967
Harken P2 disc 1967
Starr Edwards 2300 ball 1967
Starr Edwards 6300 ball 1967
Wada disc 1967
Braunwald-Cutter ball 1968
Braunwald-Cutter/M/T ball 1968
Starr Edwards 2310 ball 1968
Starr Edwards 6310 ball 1968
Starr Edwards 6500 disc 1968
Björk-Shiley TSD disc 1969
DeBakey-Surgitool ball 1969
Starr Edwards 2320 ball 1970
Starr Edwards 6520 disc 1970
Cooley-Cutter/M/T disc 1971
Starr Edwards 2400 ball 1972
Cooley-Cutter disc 1973
Beall disc 1974
Björk-Shiley disc 1975
Lillehei-Kaster 500/300 disc 1975
Medtronic-Hall 7700/A,M disc 1977
St. Jude Medical bileaflet 1977
Omniscience disc 1978
Björk-Shiley MS disc 1981
Duromedics bileafet 1982
Valve Type Introduced
2. Biological valves
Shumway Angell fresh tissue 1969
Hancock porcine 1969
Zerbini dura mater 1971
Carpentier porcine 1975
Angell-Shiley porcine 1976
Ionescu-Shiley pericardium 1976
Mitroflow pericardium 1982
3. Valves in current use
I. Mechanical valves
Medtronic - Medtronic Hall
St. Jude Medical - Standard, HP, Regent, Masters
Sulzer - Carbomedics, Top Hat, Sumit
Medical Carbon Research Inc. - On-X
ATS Medical Inc. - ATS
Sorin - Monocast, Carbocast, Bicarbon
Baxter - Starr-Edwards, Tekna, Mira
Medical Inc. - Omniscience, Omnicarbon
Ultracor
Macchi
Chitra
St. Vincents
GuangDeong
II. Biological Valves
St Jude Medical - Toronto SPV, Epic, Biocor
Medtronic - Freestyle, Mosaic, Intact, Hancock II
Baxter - Perimount, Carpentier-Edwards
Cryolife - O'Brien, Ross
Sulzer - Synergy, Mitroflow, Labcor

Prof. Dr. Felix Unger

President of EASA and EHI

Waagplatz 3

5020 Salzburg

Österreich