Int J Sports Med 2001; 22(4): 280-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-13816
Training and Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 Portable Metabolic System

J. E. McLaughlin1 , G. A. King1 , E. T. Howley1 , D. R. Bassett, Jr1 , B. E. Ainsworth2
  • 1 Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA
  • 2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Exercise Science, School of Public Health, The University of South Carolina, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the accuracy of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system against the criterion Douglas bag (DB) method. During cycle ergometry on consecutive days, oxygen consumption (V˙O2), carbon dioxide production (V˙CO2), minute ventilation (V˙E), and respiratory exchange ratio (R) were measured at rest and during power outputs of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250W. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in V˙O2 between the K4 b2 and DB at rest and at 250 W. Though the K4 b2 values were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than DB values at 50, 100, 150, and 200 W, the magnitude of these differences was small (0.088, 0.092, 0.096, and 0.088 L × min-1, respectively). V˙CO2 and V˙E values from the K4 b2 were significantly lower than the DB at 200 and 250 W, while no significant differences were observed from rest through 150 W. The slight overestimation of V˙O2 (50 - 200 W) combined with the underestimation of V˙CO2 (200 and 250 W) by the K4 b2 resulted in significantly lower R values at every stage. These findings suggest the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic measurement system is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake over a fairly wide range of exercise intensities.

References

  • 1 . Abacus Concepts .Super ANOVA. Berkeley, CA; Abacus Concepts, Inc. 1989: 198-204
  • 2 Armstrong L E, Costill D L. Variability of respiration and metabolism: responses to submaximal cycling and running.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 1985;  56 93-96
  • 3 Beaver W L, Wasserman K, Whipp B J. On-line computer analysis and breath-by-breath graphical display of exercise function tests.  J Appl Physiol. 1973;  34 128-132
  • 4 Bigard A X, Guezennec C Y. Evaluation of the Cosmed K2 telemetry system during exercise at moderate altitude.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;  27 1333-1338
  • 5 Bland  J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
  • 6 Crandall C G, Taylor S L, Raven P B. Evaluation of the Cosmed K2 portable telemetric oxygen uptake analyzer.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;  26 108-111
  • 7 Hausswirth C, Bigard A X, Le Chevalier J M. The Cosmed K4 telemetry system as an accurate device for oxygen uptake measurements during exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 1997;  18 449-453
  • 8 Lucia A, Fleck S J, Gotshall R W, Kearney J T. Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 instrument.  Int J Sports Med. 1993;  14 380-386
  • 9 McArdle W D, Katch F I, Katch V L. Exercise Physiology. Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance. Baltimore; Williams and Wilkins 1996 4
  • 10 Peel C, Utsey C. Oxygen consumption using the K2 telemetry system and a metabolic cart.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;  25 396-400
  • 11 Scholander P F. Analyzer for accurate estimation of respiratory gases in one-half cubic centimeter samples.  J of Biol Chem. 1947;  167 235-250
  • 12 Stuart M K, Howley E T, Gladden L B, Cox R H. Efficiency of trained subjects differing in maximal oxygen uptake and type of training.  J Appl Physiol. 1981;  50 444-449
  • th

J. E. McLaughlin, M. A. 

Department of HPER
Jacksonville State University

700 Pelham Road North
Jacksonville, AL 36265
USA


Phone: Phone:+ 01 (256) 782-8014

Fax: Fax: + 01 (256) 782-5546

Email: E-mail:laughlin@succ.jsu.edu

    >