Proper Handling of Soft Tissue in the Acute Phase

Joseph Leach

doi:10.1055/s-2001-18825

Facial Plastic Surgery, Table of Contents

Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17(4): 227-238
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18825

Proper Handling of Soft Tissue in the Acute Phase

Joseph Leach

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Proper handling of soft tissue in the acute phase demands proper attention to fundamental principles in wound evaluation, preparation, and repair. Foundational to immediate wound care is appropriate hemostasis and anesthesia. Correct soft tissue cleaning techniques are important, and the surgeon should understand special situations in which contamination may be a problem, including bites. The controversial issue of antibiotic prophylaxis is discussed. Certain wounds are not amenable to closure, but, where closure is indicated, orientation and preparation of the repair are important. Regional considerations important to the face are addressed. Numerous methods of wound closure are now available, and the advantages of each are enumerated. Postoperatively, attention to patient counseling, dressings, ointment, cleaning, and scar revision help assure an optimal outcome for the traumatized tissue.

KEYWORD

Laceration - wound - infection - cleaning - closure

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Key S J, Thomas D W, Shepherd J P. The management of soft tissue facial wounds. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1995; 33 76-85
2 Foster C A, Aston S J. Propranolol-epinephrine interaction. A potential disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1983; 72 74-77
3 Magee C, Rodeheaver G T, Edgerton M T. Studies of the mechanisms by which epinephrine damages tissue defenses. J Surg Res . 1977; 23 126-131
4 Pryor G J, Kilpatrick W R, Opp D R. Local anesthesia in minor lacerations: topical TAC vs lidocaine infiltration. Ann Emerg Med . 1980; 9 568-571
5 Ernst A A, Marvez E, Nick T G, Chin E, Wood E, Gonzaba T. Lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine gel versus tetracaine adrenaline cocaine gel for topical anesthesia in linear scalp and facial lacerations in children aged 5 to 17 years. Pediatrics . 1995; 95 255-258
6 Ernst A A, Marvez-Valls E, Nick T G, Weiss S J. LAT (lidocaine-adrenaline-tetracaine) versus TAC (tetracaine-aderenaline-cocaine) for topical anesthesia in face and scalp lacerations. Am J Emerg Med . 1995; 13 151-154
7 Smith G A, Strausbaugh S D, Harbek-Weber C, Cohen D M, Shields B J, Powers J D. Tetracaine-licocaine-phenylephrine topical anesthesia compared with lidocaine infiltration during repair of mucous membrane lacerations in children. Clin Pediatr . 1998; 37 405-412
8 Lawrence L M, Wright S W. Sedation of pediatric patients for minor laceration repair: effect on length of emergency department stay and patient charges. Pediatr Emerg Care . 1998; 14 393-395
9 Connors K, Terndrup T E. Nasal versus oral midazolam for sedation of anxious children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med . 1994; 24 1074-1079
10 Moy L S. Management of acute wounds. Dermatol Clin . 1993; 11 759-766
11 Dickinson J T, Jaquiss G W, Thompson J N. Soft tissue trauma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1976; 9 331-360
12 Hollander J E, Richman P B, Werblud M, Miller T, Heggler J, Singer A J. Irrigation in facial and scalp lacerations: does it alter outcome?. Ann Emerg Med . 1998; 31 73-77
13 Geronemus R G, Mertz P M, Eaglstein W H. Wound healing: the effect of topical antimicrobial agents. Arch Dermatol . 1979; 115 1131-1134
14 Becker G. Identification and management of the patient at high risk for wound infection. Head Neck Surg . 1986; 8 205
15 Peterson A F, Rosenberg A, Alatory S D. Comparative evaluation of surgical scrub preparations. Surg Gynecol Obstet . 1978; 146 63-65
16 Lineweaver W, Howard R, Soucy D. Topical antimicrobial toxicity. Arch Surg . 1985; 120 267-270
17 Cole R, Robbins K, Cohen J. A predictive model for wound sepsis in oncologic surgery of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1987; 96 165-171
18 Orlando M, Saltman R. Manual of Medical Therapeutics, 25th ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown; . 1988: 446-448
19 Morgan J P, Haug R H, Murphy M T. Management of facial dog bite injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1995; 53 435-441
20 Krebs J W, Strine T W, Childs J E. Rabies surveillance in the United States during 1992. J Am Vet Med Assoc . 1993; 203 1718-1731
21 Corey L, Hattwick M. Treatment of persons exposed to rabies. JAMA . 1975; 232 272-276
22 Wolff K D. Management of animal bite injuries of the face: experience with 94 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1998; 56 838-843
23 Stucker F J, Shaw G Y, Boyd S, Shockley W W. Management of animal and human bites in the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1990; 116 789-793
24 Guy J R, Zook E G. Successful treatment of acute head and neck dog bite wounds without antibiotics. Ann Plastic Surg . 1986; 17 45-58
25 Kountakis S E, Chamblee S A, Maillard A AJ, Stiernberg C M. Animal bites to the head and neck. Ear Nose Throat J . 1998; 77 216-220
26 Callaham M. Dog bite wounds. JAMA . 1980; 244 2327-2328
27 Maimaris C, Quinton D N. Dog bite lacerations: a controlled trial of primary wound closure. Arch Emerg Med . 1988; 5 156-161
28 Callaham M. Controversies in antibiotic choices for bite wounds. Ann Emerg Med . 1988; 17 1321-1330
29 Schuster G S. Oral flora and pathogenic organisms. Infect Dis Clin North Am . 1999; 13 757-774
30 News and Notes. Transmission of HIV by human bite. Lancet . 1987; 2 522
31 Wahn V, Kramer J, Voit T. Horizontal transmission of HIV infection between two siblings. Lancet . 1990; 336 502-503
32 Agrawal K, Mishra S, Panda K N. Primary reconstruction of major human bite wounds of the face. Plast Reconst Surg . 1992; 90 394-398
33 Donkor P, Bankas D O. A study of primary closure of human bite injuries to the face. J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 1997; 55 479-481
34 Chidzonga M. Human bites of the face. S Afr Med J . 1998; 88 150-152
35 Wray R C. Force required for wound closure and scar appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1983; 72 380-382
36 Madden J E, Edlich R F, Custer J R. Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. I.V.-Resistance to infection of surgical wounds made by knife, electrosurgery and laser. Am J Surg . 1970; 119 222-224
37 Howes E L, Harvey S C. The strength of healing wound in relation to the holding strength of the catgut suture. N Engl J Med . 1929; 200 1285
38 Magee C, Rodeheaver G T, Golden G T. Potentiation of wound infection by surgical drains. Am J Surg . 1976; 131 547-549
39 Edlich R F, Panek P H, Rodeheaver G T, Turnbull V G, Kurtz L D, Edgerton M T. Physical and chemical configuration of sutures in the development of surgical infection. Ann Surg . 1973; 177 679-687
40 Edlich R F, Rodeheaver G T, Thacker J G, Winn H R, Edgerton M T. Management of soft tissue injury. Clin Plast Surg . 1977; 4 191-198
41 Reiter D. Methods and materials for wound closure. Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1995; 28 1069-1080
42 Capperauld I, Bucknall T E. Sutures and dressings. In: Bucknall TE, Ellis H, eds. Wound Healing for Surgeons London: Bailliere Tindall 1984: 75
43 Osmond M H, Klassen T P, Quinn J V. Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations. J Pediatr . 1995; 126 892-895
44 Guyuron B, Vaughan C. A comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials for skin repair. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1992; 89 234
45 Meiring L, Cilliers K, Barry R. A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure. S Afr Med J . 1982; 62 371
46 Rees T D. Is there a place for the staple gun in plastic surgery?. Ann Plast Surg . 1978; 1 238
47 Simon H K, Zempsky W T, Bruns T B, Sullivan K M. Lacerations against Langer's lines: to glue or suture?. J Emerg Med . 1998; 16 185-189
48 Osmond M H, Quinn J V, Sutcliffe T, Jarmuske M, Klassen T P. A randomized clinical trial comparing butylcyanoacrylate with octylcyanoacrylate in the management of selected pediatric facial lacerations. Acad Emerg Med . 1999; 6 171-177
49 Woodley D T, Chen J D, Kim J P. Re-epithelialization. Human keratinocyte locomotion. Dermatol Clin . 1993; 11 641-646
50 Noe J M, Keller M. Can stitches get wet?. Plastic Reconst Surg . 1987; 81 82-83
51 Eaglstein W H. Occlusive dressings. J Dermatol Surg Oncol . 1993; 19 716-720
52 Field C K, Kerstein M D. Overview of healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg . 1994; 167(suppl) 2S-6S
53 Linsky C B, Rovee D T, Dow, T. Effect of dressing on wound inflammation and scar tissue. In: Dineen P, Hildrick-Smith G, eds. The Surgical Wound Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger 1981: 191
54 Brown C D, Zitelli J A. Choice of wound dressings and ointments. Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1995; 28 1081-1091
55 Mertz P M, Marshall D A, Eaglstein, W H. Occlusive dressing to prevent bacterial invasion and wound infection. J Am Acad Dermatol . 1985; 12 662-668
56 Thomas D W, Hill M, Lewis M AO, Stephens P, Walker R, von der Weth A. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of semi-occlusive dressings on the microflora and clinical outcome of acute facial wounds. Wound Rep Reg . 2000; 8 258-263
57 Schauerhamer R A, Edlich R F, Panek P. Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. VII. Susceptibility of surgical wounds to postoperative surface contamination. Am J Surg . 1971; 122 74-77
58 Hirschmann J V. Topical antibiotics in dermatology. Arch Dermatol . 1988; 124 1691-1700
59 Physician's Desk Reference, 47th ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Data 1993 813 818 2187
60 Mertz P M, Dunlop B W, Eaglstein W H. The effects of Bactroban ointment on epidermal wound healing in partial thickness wounds. In: Dobson R, Leyden JJ, Noble WC, et al., eds. Bactroban Princeton, NJ: Excerpta Medica 1985: 211
61 Sproat J E, Dalcin A, Weitauer N, Roberts R S. Hypertrophic sternal scars, silicone gel sheet versus kenalog injection treatment. Plas Reconst Surg . 1992; 90 988-992
62 Quinn K J, Evans J H, Courtney J M, Gaylor J DS. Non-pressure treatment of hypertrophic scars. Burns Incl Therm Inj . 1985; 12 102
63 Ricketts C H, Martin L, Faria D T, Saed G M, Fivenson D P. Cytokine mRNA changes during the treatment of hypertrophic scars with silicone and nonsilicone gel dressings. Dermatol Surg . 1996; 22 955-959
64 Harmon C B, Zelickson B D, Roenigk R K. Dermabrasive scar revision. Immunohistochemical and utrastructural evaluation. Dermatol Surg . 1995; 21 503-508
65 Katz B E, Oca A G. A controlled study of the effectiveness of spot dermabrasion (`scarabrasion') on the appearance of surgical scars. J Am Acad Dermatol . 1991; 24 262-266
66 Nehal K S, Levine V J, Ross B, Ashinoff R. Comparison of high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing and dermabrasion in the revision of surgical scars. Dermatol Surg . 1998; 24 647-650