Cryobiology Ethics of Human Reproduction

G. Bahadur

doi:10.1055/s-2002-23521

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Reprod Med 2002; 20(1): 075-084
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23521

Cryobiology Ethics of Human Reproduction

G. Bahadur

Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Laboratories, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Free & University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The article surveys the ethical and social issues that arise from recent developments in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) involving cryotechnology and argues that practitioners must understand ethical as well as technological issues. It discusses the risks associated with ART and the importance of the need to inform patients of them so that they can make considered decisions. It considers problematic areas in the use of ART, particularly the case of lesbian women who wish to conceive. It offers a philosophical definition of ethics and a framework for defining ethical, and unethical, clinical practice. It advocates a utilitarian approach to moral problems, one that attends to the moral consequences of actions. It examines the complex way that morality, law, and ethics interact and refers to controversial legal decisions in the United Kingdom concerning ART. This article considers the various rights (of donors, prospective parents, and offspring) that need to be taken into account by practitioners of ART.

KEYWORD

Morality - law - rights - autonomy - consent - cryoethics - reproduction - cryotechnology

Volltext

Referenzen

REFERENCES

1 Bahadur G. Posthumous assisted reproduction (PAR): cancer patients, potential cases, counselling and consent. Hum Reprod . 1996; 11 2573-2575
2 Strong C, Gingrich J R, Kutteh W H. Ethics of sperm retrieval after death or persistent vegetative state. Hum Reprod . 2000; 15 739-745
3 De Sutter P. Gender reassignment and assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod . 2001; 16 612-614
4 Bunge R G, Sherman J K. Fertilising capacity of frozen human spermatozoa. Nature . 1953; 172 767
5 Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight cell embryo. Nature . 1983; 305 707-709
6 Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet . 1986; 1 884-886
7 Fabbri R, Porcu R, Marsella T, Rocchetta G, Venturoli S, Flamigni C. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum Reprod . 2001; 16 411-416
8 Pickering S J, Braude P R, Johnson M H. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril . 1990; 54 102-108
9 Zenzes M T, Bielecki R, Casper R F, Leibo S P. Effects of chilling to 0°C on the morphology of meiotic spindles in human metaphase II oocytes. Fertil Steril . 2001; 75 769-777
10 Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem C A. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of a single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet . 1992; 340 17-18
11 Porcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R. Birth of six healthy children after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved oocyte. Human Reprod . 1998; 12 124
12 Alper M A, Brinsden P, Fischer R, Wikland M. To blastocyst or not to blastocyst?. <~>That is the question. Hum Reprod . 2001; 16 617-619
13 Gook D A, McCully B A, Edgar D H, McBain J C. Development of antral follicles in human cryopreserved ovarian tissue following xenografting. Hum Reprod . 2001; 16 417-422
14 Newton H, Illingworth P. In-vitro growth of murine pre-antral follicles after isolation from cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod . 2001; 16 423-429
15 Paynter S J, O'Neil L, Fuller B J, Shaw R W. Membrane permeability of human oocytes in the presence of the cryoprotectant propane-1,2-diol. Fertil Steril . 2001; 75 532-538
16 Bahadur G, Steele S J. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for patients: case report. Hum Reprod . 1996; 11 2215-2216
17 Newton H, Aubard Y, Rutherford A. Low temperature storage and grafting of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod . 1996; 11 1487-1491
18 Cortvrindt R G, Smitz J E. Fluorescent probes allow rapid and precise recording of follicle density and staging in human ovarian cortical biopsy samples. Fertil Steril . 2001; 75 588-593
19 Dimirci B, Lornage J, Salle B, Frappart L, Franck M, Guerin J F. Follicular viability and morphology of sheep ovaries after exposure to cryoprotectant and cryopreservation with different freezing protocols. Fertil Steril . 2001; 75 754-762
20 Human Fertilisation and Embryology A ct. London: HMSO . 1990
21 Bahadur G, Whelan J, Davies M C, Ralph D. Cancer patients, gametes, gonadal tissue, and the UK legal status. RBM Online . 2001; 2 8-10
22 Bahadur G. The Human Rights Act (1998) and its impact on human reproductive issues. Hum Reprod . 2001; 16 785-789
23 Crockin S. Legally speaking: New Jersey Supreme Court to hear frozen embryo appeal (J.B v M.B.). American Society for Reproductive Medicine News . 2000; 34 23-25
24 Leonard S. Embryo given away because it's not a girl. Sunday Times. March 4, 2001; No. 9210
25 Bahadur G, Ralph D. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in boys with paediatric cancers. Hum Reprod . 1999; 14 11-17
26 Bahadur G, Whelan J, Ralph D, Hindmarsh P. Gaining consent to freeze spermatozoa from adolescents with cancer: legal, ethical and practical aspects. Hum Reprod . 2001; 16 188-193
27 Singer P. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993
28 Mason J K, McCall Smith A R. Law and Medical Ethics. 5th Ed. London: Butterworths; 1999
29 Gert B. Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998
30 Velasquez M, Rostankowski C. Ethics: Theory and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1985
31 R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, exp Blood, 1997. 2 All ER 687, (1997) 35 BMLR 1, CA .
32 Ginsburg E S, Yanushpolsky E H, Jackson K V. In-vitro fertilisation for cancer patients and survivors. Fertil Steril . 2001; 75 705-710
33 Schnorr J A, Doviak M J, Muasher S J, Jones H W. Impact of a cryopreservation programme on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril . 2001; 75 147-151
34 Husain F A. Reproductive issues from the Islamic perspective. Human Fertility . 2000; 3 124-128
35 Hirsh A V. Infertility in Jewish couples, biblical and rabbinic law. Human Fertility . 1998; 1 14-19
36 Ahuja K K, Simons E G. Money, morals and medical risks: conflicting notions underlying the recruitment of egg donors. Hum Reprod . 1999; 14 279-284
37 Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. Available at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk .
38 Dworkin G. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. 1991: 205
39 Scott G G. Making Ethical Choices: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House; 1998
40 Roy D J, Williams J R, Dickens B M. Bioethics in Canada. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall 1994: 37-38
41 Edwards R G, Ahuja K K. Legal cases spell big trouble and great opportunities for IVF embryologists. RBM Online . 2001; 2 70-71
42 Leavitt F. Hospital ethics committees may discourage staff from making their own decisions. BMJ . 2000; 321 1414
43 Bahadur G, Tedder R S. Quarantine and cryopreservation. Hum Reprod . 1997; 12 2579-2580
44 Clarke G N. Sperm cryopreservation: is there a significant risk of cross contamination. Hum Reprod . 1999; 14 2941-2943
45 Janssens P MW. Safety during sperm banking. Hum Reprod . 1997; 12 2579-2580
46 Benifla J-L, Letur-Konirsch H, Collin G. Safety of cryopreservation straws for human gametes or embryos: a preliminary study with human immunodeficiency virus-1. Hum Reprod . 2000; 15 2186-2189
47 Ahuja K K, Simons E G. Cancer of the colon in an egg donor: policy repercussions for donor recruitment. Hum Reprod . 1998; 12 2230-2234
48 Sauer M V. Defining the incidence of serious complications experienced by oocyte donors: a review of 1000 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2001; 184 277-278
49 Schiermeier Q, Stehle K. Frozen body offers chance to travel back in time. Nature . 2000; 407 550
50 Jansen R PS. Evidence-based ethics and regulation of reproduction. Hum Reprod . 1997; 12 2068-2075