Cryobiology Ethics of Human Reproduction

ABSTRACT

The article surveys the ethical and social issues that arise from recent developments in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) involving cryotechnology and argues that practitioners must understand ethical as well as technological issues. It discusses the risks associated with ART and the importance of the need to inform patients of them so that they can make considered decisions. It considers problematic areas in the use of ART, particularly the case of lesbian women who wish to conceive. It offers a philosophical definition of ethics and a framework for defining ethical, and unethical, clinical practice. It advocates a utilitarian approach to moral problems, one that attends to the moral consequences of actions. It examines the complex way that morality, law, and ethics interact and refers to controversial legal decisions in the United Kingdom concerning ART. This article considers the various rights (of donors, prospective parents, and offspring) that need to be taken into account by practitioners of ART.

KEYWORD

Morality - law - rights - autonomy - consent - cryoethics - reproduction - cryotechnology

REFERENCES

• 1 Bahadur G. Posthumous assisted reproduction (PAR): cancer patients, potential cases, counselling and consent.  Hum Reprod . 1996;  11 2573-2575
• 2 Strong C, Gingrich J R, Kutteh W H. Ethics of sperm retrieval after death or persistent vegetative state.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 739-745
• 3 De Sutter P. Gender reassignment and assisted reproduction.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 612-614
• 4 Bunge R G, Sherman J K. Fertilising capacity of frozen human spermatozoa.  Nature . 1953;  172 767
• 5 Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight cell embryo.  Nature . 1983;  305 707-709
• 6 Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation.  Lancet . 1986;  1 884-886
• 7 Fabbri R, Porcu R, Marsella T, Rocchetta G, Venturoli S, Flamigni C. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 411-416
• 8 Pickering S J, Braude P R, Johnson M H. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte.  Fertil Steril . 1990;  54 102-108
• 9 Zenzes M T, Bielecki R, Casper R F, Leibo S P. Effects of chilling to 0°C on the morphology of meiotic spindles in human metaphase II oocytes.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 769-777
• 10 Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem C A. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of a single spermatozoon into an oocyte.  Lancet . 1992;  340 17-18
• 11 Porcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R. Birth of six healthy children after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved oocyte.  Human Reprod . 1998;  12 124
• 12 Alper M A, Brinsden P, Fischer R, Wikland M. To blastocyst or not to blastocyst?.  <~>That is the question. Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 617-619
• 13 Gook D A, McCully B A, Edgar D H, McBain J C. Development of antral follicles in human cryopreserved ovarian tissue following xenografting.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 417-422
• 14 Newton H, Illingworth P. In-vitro growth of murine pre-antral follicles after isolation from cryopreserved ovarian tissue.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 423-429
• 15 Paynter S J, O'Neil L, Fuller B J, Shaw R W. Membrane permeability of human oocytes in the presence of the cryoprotectant propane-1,2-diol.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 532-538
• 16 Bahadur G, Steele S J. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for patients: case report.  Hum Reprod . 1996;  11 2215-2216
• 17 Newton H, Aubard Y, Rutherford A. Low temperature storage and grafting of human ovarian tissue.  Hum Reprod . 1996;  11 1487-1491
• 18 Cortvrindt R G, Smitz J E. Fluorescent probes allow rapid and precise recording of follicle density and staging in human ovarian cortical biopsy samples.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 588-593
• 19 Dimirci B, Lornage J, Salle B, Frappart L, Franck M, Guerin J F. Follicular viability and morphology of sheep ovaries after exposure to cryoprotectant and cryopreservation with different freezing protocols.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 754-762
• 20 Human Fertilisation and Embryology A ct. London: HMSO . 1990
• 21 Bahadur G, Whelan J, Davies M C, Ralph D. Cancer patients, gametes, gonadal tissue, and the UK legal status.  RBM Online . 2001;  2 8-10
• 22 Bahadur G. The Human Rights Act (1998) and its impact on human reproductive issues.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 785-789
• 23 Crockin S. Legally speaking: New Jersey Supreme Court to hear frozen embryo appeal (J.B  v M.B.). American Society for Reproductive Medicine News . 2000;  34 23-25
• 24 Leonard S. Embryo given away because it's not a girl. Sunday Times. March 4, 2001; No. 9210
• 25 Bahadur G, Ralph D. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in boys with paediatric cancers.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 11-17
• 26 Bahadur G, Whelan J, Ralph D, Hindmarsh P. Gaining consent to freeze spermatozoa from adolescents with cancer: legal, ethical and practical aspects.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 188-193
• 27 Singer P. Practical Ethics.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993
• 28 Mason J K, McCall Smith A R. Law and Medical Ethics.  5th Ed. London: Butterworths; 1999
• 29 Gert B. Morality: Its Nature and Justification.  Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998
• 30 Velasquez M, Rostankowski C. Ethics: Theory and Practice.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1985
• 31 R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, exp Blood, 1997. 2 All ER 687, (1997) 35 BMLR 1, CA . 
• 32 Ginsburg E S, Yanushpolsky E H, Jackson K V. In-vitro fertilisation for cancer patients and survivors.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 705-710
• 33 Schnorr J A, Doviak M J, Muasher S J, Jones H W. Impact of a cryopreservation programme on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 147-151
• 34 Husain F A. Reproductive issues from the Islamic perspective.  Human Fertility . 2000;  3 124-128
• 35 Hirsh A V. Infertility in Jewish couples, biblical and rabbinic law.  Human Fertility . 1998;  1 14-19
• 36 Ahuja K K, Simons E G. Money, morals and medical risks: conflicting notions underlying the recruitment of egg donors.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 279-284
• 37 Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority. Available at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk . 
• 38 Dworkin G. Taking Rights Seriously.  London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. 1991: 205
• 39 Scott G G. Making Ethical Choices: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas.  St. Paul, MN: Paragon House; 1998
• 40 Roy D J, Williams J R, Dickens B M. Bioethics in Canada.  Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice Hall 1994: 37-38
• 41 Edwards R G, Ahuja K K. Legal cases spell big trouble and great opportunities for IVF embryologists.  RBM Online . 2001;  2 70-71
• 42 Leavitt F. Hospital ethics committees may discourage staff from making their own decisions.  BMJ . 2000;  321 1414
• 43 Bahadur G, Tedder R S. Quarantine and cryopreservation.  Hum Reprod . 1997;  12 2579-2580
• 44 Clarke G N. Sperm cryopreservation: is there a significant risk of cross contamination.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 2941-2943
• 45 Janssens P MW. Safety during sperm banking.  Hum Reprod . 1997;  12 2579-2580
• 46 Benifla J-L, Letur-Konirsch H, Collin G. Safety of cryopreservation straws for human gametes or embryos: a preliminary study with human immunodeficiency virus-1.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 2186-2189
• 47 Ahuja K K, Simons E G. Cancer of the colon in an egg donor: policy repercussions for donor recruitment.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  12 2230-2234
• 48 Sauer M V. Defining the incidence of serious complications experienced by oocyte donors: a review of 1000 cases.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2001;  184 277-278
• 49 Schiermeier Q, Stehle K. Frozen body offers chance to travel back in time.  Nature . 2000;  407 550
• 50 Jansen R PS. Evidence-based ethics and regulation of reproduction.  Hum Reprod . 1997;  12 2068-2075