Download PDF
Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2002; 45(1): 11-15
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23576
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Stereotactic Biopsies Guided by an Optical Navigation System: Technique and Clinical Experience

P.  Grunert1 , J.  Espinosa1 , C.  Busert1 , M.  Günthner1 , R.  Filippi1 , S.  Farag1 , N.  Hopf1
  • 1Neurosurgical Department, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 April 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Frame-based stereotactic biopsies are time-consuming procedures making necessary head fixation in a ring, explicit coordinate calculation and setting of the parameters. Frameless systems make many of these intermediate steps unnecessary, impose less mechanical restrictions regarding access to the lesions, and with slight modifications can be used to perform stereotactic biopsies. A special adaptation designed to fix the holder and the biopsy instrument is described. The neuronavigation optical tracking system of Radionics was used. CT scans were performed with 6 skin markers. Calibration was performed after head fixation in the Mayfield clamp. Mean calibration error was 2.19 ± 0.81 mm. The light-emitting diode holder of the pointer was fixed into 2 Leila arms and moved under visual control based on CT images. The target point was selected, Leila arms fixed and a burr hole performed. The cannula was introduced to the target, being fitted with a depth stop in a length identical to that of the pointer on the screen. If necessary a second trajectory was easily selected. 49 patients underwent a frameless stereotactic biopsy. All targets except seven were superficial or in the white matter. In selected cases the biopsies were taken from deep-seated lesions. A histological diagnosis was obtained in 100 % of the cases. Four cases deteriorated postoperatively, two of these related to intratumoral bleeding. Navigation is a simple and effective method to perform biopsies of superficial and relatively large lesions. Frame-based procedures are restricted to brainstem tumors and lesions less than 1.5 cm in diameter.

Key words

Stereotaxy - Biopsy - Intracranial Tumors - Frameless System

References

  • 1 Alberti O, Dorward N L, Kitchen N D, Thomas D GT. Neuronavigation impact on operative time.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;  68 44-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bernstein M, Parent A G. Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesions.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  81 165-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bolger C, Wigfield C, Melkent T, Smith K. Frameless stereotaxy and anterior cervical surgery.  Comput Aided Surg. 1999;  4 322-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bolger C, Winfield C. Image-guided surgery: applications to the cervical and thoracic spine and review of the first 120 procodures.  J Neurosurg. 2000;  92 175-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Buchholz R D, Ho H W, Rubin J P. Variables effecting the accuracy of stereotactic localization computerized tomography.  J Neurosurg. 1993;  79 667-673
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cook R J, Guthrie B L. Complications of stereotactic biopsy.  Perspectives in Neurosurgery. 1993;  4 131-139
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dorward N L, Alberti O, Palmer J D, Kitchen N D, Thomas D GT. Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies. Technical note.  J Neurosurg. 1999;  90 160-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Drake J M, Rutka J T, Hoffmann H J. ISG viewing wand.  Neurosurgery. 1994;  34 1094-1097
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Galloway R L, Maciunas R J, Latimer J W. The accuracy of stereotactic frame systems: an independent assessment.  Biomed Instrum Technol. 1991;  25 457-460
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Germano I M, Queenan J V. Clinical experience with intracranial needle biopsy using frameless surgical navigation.  Comput Aided Surg. 1998;  3 33-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Grunert P, Ungersböck K, Bohl J, Kitz K, Hopf N. Results of 200 intracranial stereotactic biopsies.  Neurosurg Rev. 1994;  17 59-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grunert P, Maurer J, Mueller-Forell W. Accuracy of stereotactic coordinate transformation using a localization frame and computed tomographic imaging.  Neurosurg Rev. 1999;  22 173-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hopf N J, Grunert P, Darabi K, Busert C, Bettag M. Frameless neuronavigation applied to endoscopic neurosurgery.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1999;  42 187-193
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Horsley V, Clark R H. The structure and functions of the cerebellum examined by a new method.  Brain. 1908;  31 45-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Guthrie B L, Adler J R. Computer-assisted preoperative planning, interactive surgery and frameless stereotaxy.  Clin Neurosurg. 1992;  38 112-131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kato A, Yoshimine T, Hayakawa T, Tomita Y, Ikeda T, Mitomo M, Harada K, Mogami H. A frameless, armless navigation system for computer-assisted neurosurgery.  J Neurosurg. 1991;  74 845-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kelly P J. Tumor stereotaxis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kleihues P, Volk B, Anagnostopoulos J, Kiessling M. Morphologic evaluation of stereotactic brain tumor biopsies.  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1984;  33 171-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kosugi Y, Watanabe E, Goto J. An articulated neurosurgical navigation system using MRI and CT images IEEE Trans.  Biomed Eng. 1988;  35 147-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kulkarni A V, Bernstein M. Stereotactic biopsy. In: Bernstein M, Berger MS (eds.). Neuro-Oncology the essentials. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers 2000: 122-129
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Lobato R D, Rivas J J. Applications of CT-adapted stereotaxis for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial lesions.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1987;  87 14-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lunsford L D, Martinez A J. Stereotactic exploration of the brain in the era of computed tomography.  Surg Neurol. 1984;  22 222-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Maciunas R J, Galloway R L, Laitimer J W. The application accuracy of stereotactic frames.  Neurosurgery. 1994;  35 682-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Merloz P, Tonetti J, Cinquin P, Lavalles S, Troccaz J, Pitet L. Chirurgie assistee par ordinateur: vissage de pedicules vertebreaux.  Chirurgie. 1998;  123 482-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mösges R, Schlöndorff G. A new imaging method for intraoperative therapy control in skull base surgery.  Neurosurg Rev. 1988;  11 245-247
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Muacevic A, Steiger H J. Computer-assisted resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  45 1164-1170
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Ostertag C B, Mennel H D, Kiessling M. Stereotactic biopsy of brain tumors.  Surg Neurol. 1980;  14 275-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ostertag C B. Reliability of stereotactic brain tumor biopsy.  In: Lunsford (ed.). Modern stereotactic neurosurgery. Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Boston-Dordrecht 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Reinhardt H F, Meyer H, Amrein E. A computer-assisted device for intraoperative CT-correlated localization of brain tumours.  Eur Surg Res. 1988;  20 51-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Roberts D W, Strohbehn J W, Hatch J F. A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope.  J Neurosurg. 1986;  65 545-549
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Roessler K, Ungersboeck K, Dietrich W, Aichholzer M, Hittmeier K, Matula C, Czech T, Koos W T. Frameless stereotactic guided neurosurgery: clinical experience with an infrared based pointer device navigation system.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;  139 551-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Scerrati M, Rossi G F. The reliability of stereotactic biopsy.  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1984;  33 201-205
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Schlöndorff G. et al . Computer assisted surgery.  Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryng suppl. 1987;  2 45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Soo T M, Bernstein M, Provras T. et al . Failed stereotactic biopsies in a series of 518 cases.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1996;  64 183-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ungersboeck K, Budka A, Schmidbauer M. Stereotaktische Biopsie intracranieller Prozesse: Validität der histologischen Diagnostik.  Wiener Klin Wschr. 1989;  101 376-380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Thomas D GT, Nouby R M. Experience in 300 cases of CT-directed stereotatic surgery for lesion biopsy and aspiration of hematoma.  Br J Neurosurg. 1989;  3 321-326
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Thomas D GT, Dorward N L, Kingsley D, Kitchen N D, Palmer J D, Alberti O, Velani B, Hawkes D, Zhao J, Dijkstra A, Gieles P, Buurman J, Gerritsen F A. Clinical experience with the easy guide neuronavigation system.  In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K (eds). CAR 97. Elsevier 1977: 757-760
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Watanabe E. et al . 3D digitizer (neuronavigator): a new equipment for CT guided stereotactic surgery.  Surg Neurol. 1987;  27 543-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Wirtz C R, Knauth M, Hassfeld S, Tronnier V M, Albert F K, Bonsanto M M, Kunze S. Neuronavigation. First experiences with three different commercially available systems.  Zentralbl Neurochir. 1998;  59 14-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Zamorano L, Nolte L P, Kadi A M. Interactive intraoperative localization using infrared-based system.  Neurol Res. 1993;  15 290-298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. P. Grunert

Abt. Neurochirurgie, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

Langenbeckstr. 1

55131 Mainz

Germany

      >