Download PDF
Neuropediatrics 2003; 34(1): 23-29
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38622
Original Article

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Auditory Event-Related Potentials in the Assessment of Auditory Processing Disorders: A Pilot Study

A. Liasis 1 , 2 , D.-E. Bamiou 3 , P. Campbell 3 , T. Sirimanna 3 , S. Boyd 2 , A. Towell 2 , 4
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, U.K.
  • 2Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, U.K.
  • 3Audiological Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, U.K.
  • 4University of Westminster, London, U.K.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: October 24, 2002

Accepted after Revision: December 15, 2002

Publication Date:
11 April 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether children with a suspected auditory processing disorder (sAPD) in the presence of normal hearing, differ significantly from normal age-matched controls on particular parameters of auditory event-related potentials. We assessed nine children (mean age 9.5 years) in whom the clinical profile and the results in a screening test for auditory processing disorder (SCAN/SCAN-A) suggested the presence of an auditory processing disorder, and nine age-matched normal control subjects, using auditory event-related potentials (ERP) to phonemes/ba/(standard) and/da/(deviant). Analysis of the auditory ERP recordings revealed an enlarged P85 - 120 and attenuated N1 and P2 in all sAPD children compared to controls. We also found significantly increased N1 peak latency, and a larger peak to peak amplitude of the P85 - 120-N1 and P2-N2 and smaller peak to peak amplitude of the N1-P2 in the sAPD children. Subtraction of the standard auditory ERP from the deviant revealed a mismatch negativity with no significant differences in duration, peak or onset latency between the control subjects and sAPD. Our results indicate that neurophysiological measures may identify a group of children with specific problems suggestive of an auditory processing disorder in the absence of an obvious structural or functional lesion who warrant further study in order to assess whether these findings reflect delayed CNS myelination.

Key words

Auditory evoked potentials - auditory processing disorder - mismatch negativity

References

  • 1 American Speech and Language Hearing Association . Central auditory processing: current status of research and implications for clinical practice.  Am J Audiol. 1996;  5 2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Baran J, Musiek F E. Behavioral assessment of the central auditory nervous system. Musiek FE, Rintelman WF Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Boston; Allyn and Bacon 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 3 British Society of Audiology . Recommended procedure for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument.  Br J Audiol. 1981;  15 213-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bruneau N, Roux S, Guerin P, Barthelemy C. Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4 - 8-year-old children.  Psychophysiology. 1997;  34 32-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cacace A T, McFarland D J. Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: a critical review.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;  41 355-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cheour M, Alho K, Sainio K, Reinikainen K. et al . The mismatch negativity to changes in speech sounds at the age of three months.  Dev Neuropsychol. 1997;  13 167-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chermak G D, Musiek F E. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego; Singular Publishing Group 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Dehaene-Lambertz G. Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults.  Neuroreport. 1997;  8 919-924
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Giard M H, Perrin F, Echallier J F, Thevenet M, Froment J C, Pernier J. Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: a scalp current density and dipole model analysis.  Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;  92 238-252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hurley R M. Musiek FE. Effectiveness of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in predicting hearing level.  J Am Acad of Audiol. 1994;  5 195-203
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;  11 467-474
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Keith R W. SCAN - A screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders. Cincinatti, Ohio; Psychological Corporation 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Keith R W. SCAN - A Test for Auditory Processing Disorders in Adolescents and Adults. Cincinatti, Ohio; Psychological Corporation 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions.  Ear Hear. 1990;  11 93-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kraus N, McGee T, Micco A, Sharma A, Carrell T, Nicol T. Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;  88 123-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Liasis A, Towell A, Alho K, Boyd S. Intracranial identification of a frontal component to acoustic change: a case study.  Cogn Brain Res. 2001;  11 227-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Marriage J, King J, Briggs J, Lutman M E. The reliability of the SCAN test: results from a primary school population in the UK.  Br J Audiol. 2001;  35 199-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Moore J K, Perazzo L M, Braun A. Time course of axonal myelination in the human brainstem auditory pathway.  Hear Res. 1995;  87 21-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Musiek F E, Gollegly K M, Lamb L E, Lamb P. Selected issues in screening for central auditory processing dysfunction.  Semin Hear. 1990;  11 372-383
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Musiek F E, Gollegly K, Ross M. Profiles of types of auditory processing disorders in children with learning disabilities.  J Child Comm Dis. 1985;  9 43-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function.  Beh Brain Sci. 1990;  13 201-288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Näätänen R. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience.  Ear Hear. 1995;  16 6-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.  Psychophysiology. 1987;  24 375-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pallier C, Dupoux E, Jeannin X. EXPE; an expandable programming language for on-line physiological experiments.  Beh Res Methods, Instruments and Computers. 1997;  29 322-327
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sams M, Hari R, Rif J, Knuutila J. The human auditory sensory memory trace persists about 10 sec: Neuromagnetic evidence.  J Cog Neurosci. 1993;  5 363-370
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schwartz D M, Morris M D, Jacobson J T. The normal auditory brainstem response and its variants. Jacobson JT Principles and Applications in Auditory Evoked Potentials. Chapter 6. London; Allyn and Bacon 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T J, Nicol T G. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;  104 540-545
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tallal P, Miller S L, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan S S, Schreiner C. et al . Language comprehension in language-learning impaired children improved with acoustically modified speech.  Science. 1996;  271 81-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Tonnquist-Uhlen I, Borg E, Spens K E. Topography of auditory evoked long-latency potentials in normal children, with particular reference to the N1 component.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;  95 34-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Alki Liasis

Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children

Great Ormond Street

London WC1 N 3JH

U.K.

Email: a.liasis@ich.ucl.ac.uk

      >