Abstract
Two classes of heteroleptic magnesium complexes, alkylmagnesium
amides RMgNR2 and aryloxymagnesium amides ROMgNR2 ,
have been prepared and subsequently shown to be efficient bases
in the enantioselective deprotonation of substituted cyclic ketones.
When compared with their magnesium bisamide counterparts, significantly
different reactivity and selectivity profiles, including an unexpected
reversal in enantioselectivity, has been observed with the new reagents.
Key words
asymmetric synthesis - chirality - magnesium
amides - heteroleptic complexes
References <A NAME="RD07203ST-1">1 </A>
Present address: Department of Chemistry
and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, 251 Nieuwland Science
Hall, Notre Dame, IN, 46556-5670, USA.
<A NAME="RD07203ST-2">2 </A>
Henderson KW.
Kerr WJ.
Moir JH.
Tetrahedron
2002,
58:
4573
For recent reviews, see:
<A NAME="RD07203ST-3A">3a </A>
O’Brien P.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2001,
95
<A NAME="RD07203ST-3B">3b </A>
O’Brien P.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1998,
1439
<A NAME="RD07203ST-3C">3c </A>
Simpkins NS.
Pure Appl. Chem.
1996,
68:
691
<A NAME="RD07203ST-4">4 </A>
Henderson KW.
Mulvey RE.
Clegg W.
O’Neil PA.
Polyhedron
1993,
12:
2535
<A NAME="RD07203ST-5">5 </A>
Zhang M.
Eaton PE.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2002,
41:
2169
<A NAME="RD07203ST-6">6 </A>
Henderson KW.
Allan JF.
Kennedy AR.
Chem. Commun.
1997,
1149
<A NAME="RD07203ST-7">7 </A>
Ashby EC.
Willard GF.
J. Org. Chem.
1978,
43:
4094
During the preparation of this manuscript
two articles have appeared detailing the use of chiral alkylmagnesium
amides in enantioselective alkylation of aldehydes and in the asymmetric
reduction of aryl trifluoromethylketones:
<A NAME="RD07203ST-8A">8a </A>
Yong KH.
Taylor NJ.
Chong JM.
Org. Lett.
2002,
4:
3553
<A NAME="RD07203ST-8B">8b </A>
Yong KH.
Chong JM.
Org.
Lett.
2002,
4:
4139
<A NAME="RD07203ST-9">9 </A>
Henderson KW.
Kerr WJ.
Moir JH.
Chem.
Commun.
2000,
479
<A NAME="RD07203ST-10">10 </A>
It is also worth noting that in order
to access the bisamide species, heating to reflux in THF or hexane
(with two equivalents of the chiral amine) is required.
[2 ]
[9 ]
For related discussions on replacing
HMPA as an additive see:
<A NAME="RD07203ST-11A">11a </A>
O’Neil IA.
Lai JYQ.
Wynn D.
Chem. Commun.
1999,
59
<A NAME="RD07203ST-11B">11b </A>
Mukhopadhyay T.
Seebach D.
Helv. Chim. Acta
1982,
65:
385
<A NAME="RD07203ST-12">12 </A>
Representative experimental procedure:
To a Schlenk flask, under N2 , was added Bu2 Mg
(0.79 M solution in heptane, 1.27 mL, 1 mmol). The heptane was then
removed in vacuo and replaced with THF (10 mL), followed by the
addition of (R )-N -benzyl-α-methylbenzylamine 2 (0.21 mL, 1 mmol). The resultant solution
was stirred at room temperature for 90 min and then cooled to -78 °C,
whereupon TMSCl (0.5 mL, 4 mmol) and DMPU (0.06 mL, 0.5 mmol) were
added. After stirring for 20 min at -78 °C, 4-tert -butylcyclohexanone 5a (0.123
g, 0.8 mmol) was added as a solution in THF (2 mL) over 1 h using
a syringe pump. The reaction was then quenched by the addition of
saturated NaHCO3 (5 mL). After warming to room temperature
the reaction mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (30 mL) and
washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (2 × 20
mL). The combined aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether
(2 × 20 mL), the combined organic phase dried (Na2 SO4 ),
and the solvent removed in vacuo. The reaction conversion was determined as
80% by G.C. analysis [CP SIL 19CB fused silica
capillary column; carrier gas H2 (80 kPa); 45 °C
(1 min)-190 °C; temperature gradient: 45°C/min; t
R = 3.27 min (5a ), t
R = 3.69 min
(6a )]. Flash column chromatography
(eluting with petroleum ether) afforded (S )-4-tert -butyl-1-trimethylsiloxy-1-cyclohexene
(S )-6a (0.136
g, 60%) as a clear oil which displayed an enantiomeric
ratio of 86:14 {Chirasil-DEX CB capillary column; carrier
gas H2 (80 kPa); 70-130 °C; temperature
gradient: 1.7 °C/min;
t
R = 37.66
min [(S )-6a ], t
R = 37.97 min [(R )-6a .]}.
<A NAME="RD07203ST-13">13 </A>
However, the reactivity of both the amide and the alkyl anions in
the deprotonation reactions cannot definitively be ruled out.
<A NAME="RD07203ST-14">14 </A>
Henderson KW.
Kerr WJ.
Moir JH.
Synlett
2001,
1253
<A NAME="RD07203ST-15">15 </A>
Eaton PE.
Lee CH.
Xiong Y.
J.
Am. Chem. Soc.
1989,
111:
8016
<A NAME="RD07203ST-16">16 </A> For a recent review of catalytic
enantioselective deprotonations see:
Eames J.
Eur.
J. Org. Chem.
2002,
393