Effects of Body Mass Index on the Accuracy of an Electronic Pedometer

Abstract

Electronic pedometers are accurate for assessing steps taken while walking in normal weight adults but the accuracy of these devices has not been tested in overweight and obese men and women. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of an electronic pedometer for measuring steps taken at various walking speeds in groups of adults with variations in body mass index (BMI). The secondary purpose was to determine if the manufacturer recommended position is the best placement position for overweight and obese adults. Participants were categorized into one of three BMI categories identified by the World Health Organization: normal (N = 25; < 25 kg × m^-2), overweight (N = 24; 25 - 29.9 kg × m^-2), or obese (N = 17; ≥ 30 kg × m^-2). Participants walked on a treadmill for 3 min at 54, 67, 80, 94, and 107 m × min^-1 for a total of 15 min. During the treadmill walking, three electronic pedometers tallied steps taken. The pedometers were placed at the waist level, one on the anterior mid-line of the thigh (front; manufacturer recommended placement), one on the mid-axillary line (side), and one on the posterior mid-line of the thigh (back). Concurrently, a researcher counted steps using a hand-tally counter. Category of BMI did not affect the accuracy of the pedometer at any walking speed (54 m × min^-1, p = 0.991; 67 m × min^-1, p = 0.556; 80 m × min^-1, p = 0.591; 94 m × min^-1, p = 0.426; 107 m × min^-1, p = 0.869). At 54 m × min^-1, the front, side, and back pedometers significantly underestimated hand-tally counted steps by 20 % (p < 0.001), 33 % (p < 0.001), and 26 % (p < 0.001), respectively. At 67 m × min^-1 the front, side, and back pedometers significantly underestimated hand-tally counted steps by 7 % (p = 0.027), 13 % (p < 0.001), 11 % (p = 0.002), respectively. The steps recorded by the electronic pedometers placed at the front, side and back of the waist were not significantly different than steps counted by the hand-tally counter at speeds of 80 m × min^-1 and higher for all subjects combined. An electronic pedometer accurately quantified steps walked at speeds of 80 m × min^-1 or faster in persons with a normal BMI and those classified as overweight or obese. The placement of the pedometer on the front, side or back of the waistband did not affect accuracy of the pedometer for counting steps.

Key words

Steps - BMI - obesity - validity - walking - step counter

References

• 1 Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults.  Arch Intern Med. 1998;  158 1855-1867
• 2 Bassett D Jr, Strath S. Use of Pedometers to Assess Physical Activity. Welk GJ. Physical Activity Assessments for Health-Related Research. Champaign:Human Kinetics. 2002
• 3 Bassett D Jr. Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring in physical activity.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;  71 30-36
• 4 Bassett D Jr, Ainsworth B, Leggett S, Mathien C, Main J, Hunter D, Duncan G. Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;  28 1071-1077
• 5 Franklin B. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2000
• 6 Iwane M, Arita M, Tomimoto S, Satani O, Matsumoto M, Miyashita K. Walking 10 000 steps/day or more reduces blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity in mild essential hypertension.  Hypertens Res. 2000;  26 573-580
• 7 McCrory M A, Gomez T D, Bernauer E M, Mole PA. Evaluation of a new air displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body composition.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;  27 1686-1691
• 8 Molarius A. Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness - a critical review.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;  22 719-727
• 9 Moreau K, DeGarmo R, Langley J, McMahon C, Howley E, Bassett D Jr, Thompson D . Increasing daily walking lowers blood pressure in postmenopausal women.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;  33 1825-1831
• 10 Schutz Y, Weinsier S, Terrier P, Durrer D. A new accelerometric method to assess the daily walking practice.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;  26 111-118
• 11 Sequeira M, Rickenbach M, Wietlisbach V, Tullen B, Schutz Y. Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey.  Am J Epidemiol. 1995;  142 989-999
• 12 Shepherd E, Toloza E, McClung C, Schmalzried T. Step activity monitor: Increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity.  J Orthop Res. 1999;  17 703-708
• 13 Siri W. Body Composition from Fluid Spaces and Density: Analysis of Methods. Brozek J, Henschel A Techniques for Measuring Body Composition.  Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences- National Research Council 1961: 223-244
• 14 Sugiura H, Kajima K, Mirbod S, Iwata H, Matsuoka T. Effects of long-term moderate exercise and increase in number of daily steps on serum lipids in women: Randomised controlled trial.  BMC Womens Health. 2002;  2 3
• 15 Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth B, Whitt M, Thompson R, Addy C, Jones D. The relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity and body composition variables.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;  25 1571-1578
• 16 Tudor-Locke C, Bell R, Myers A, Harris S, Lauzon N, Rodger N. Pedometer-determined ambulatory activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002;  55 191-199
• 17 Tudor-Locke C, Myers A, Bell R, Harris S, Wilson R. Preliminary outcome evaluation of the First Step Program: A daily physical activity intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes.  Patient Educ Couns. 2002;  47 23-28
• 18 Yamanouchi K, Shinozaki T, Chikada K, Nishikawa T, Ito K, Shimizu S, Ozawa N, Suzuki Y, Maeno H, Kato K, Oshida Y, Sato Y. Daily walking combined with diet therapy is a useful means for obese NIDDM patients not only to reduce body weight but also to improve insulin sensitivity.  Diabetes Care. 1995;  18 775-778