Download PDF
Radiologie up2date 2004; 4(2): 127-146
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825710
Abdominelle und gastrointestinale Radiologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Diagnose und Differenzialdiagnose fokaler Leberläsionen

Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Focal Liver LesionsD.  Högemann Savellano1 , T.  Kirchhoff1 , M.  Galanski1
  • 1Diagnostische Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 July 2004 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Zusammenfassung

Im Hinblick auf die umschriebenen Leberveränderungen werden in diesem Beitrag zunächst die zur Verfügung stehenden bildgebenden Untersuchungsverfahren dargestellt. Die sich daran anschließende Charakterisierung der einzelnen Läsionen folgt einer Einteilung in drei Gruppen (Läsionen mit typischer Bildgebung, solche mit führender Klinik und solche mit schwieriger Diagnostik), bevor abschließend die diagnostische Strategie bei fokalen Leberläsionen noch einmal zusammenfassend dargestellt wird.

Abstract

This contribution first describes the imaging modalities available for focal hepatic changes. A subsequent characterization of the individual lesions is followed by a classification in three groups: lesions with typical imaging features, lesions in the presence of dominating clinical findings, and lesions posing a difficult diagnostic problem. Finally, the diagnostic strategy for focal liver lesions is summarized.

Key words

Liver - Liver CT - Liver MRI - Benign liver diseases - Liver neoplasms

Literatur

  • 1 Baron R L. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver.  AJR. 1994;  163 323-331
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 vanBeers B, Pringot J, Gigot J F, Dautrebande J, Mathurin P. Nontumorous attenuation differences on CT portography.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1990;  15 107-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Born M, Layer G, Kreft B, Schwarz N, Schild H. MRT, CT und CTAP in der Diagnostik maligner Lebertumoren bei Leberzirrhose.  Röfo. 1998;  168 567-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bruneton J N, Kerboul P, Grimaldi C. Hepatic intraarterial Lipiodol: technique, semiologic patterns and value for hepatic tumors.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1988;  13 45-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Buetow P C, Buck J L, Ros P R, Goodman Z D. Malignant vascular tumors of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation.  RadioGraphics. 1994;  14 153-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ferrell L, Wright T, Lake J, Raberts J, Ascher N. Incidence and diagnostic features of macroregenerative nodules vs. small HCC in cirrhotic livers.  Hepatology. 1992;  16 1372-1381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gorg C, Schwerk W B, Gorg K, Havemann K. Focal involvement of malignant lymphoma in the liver.  Bildgebung. 1991;  58 67-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hamm , B , Thoeni R F, Gould R G, Bernardino M E, Lüning M, Saini S, Mahfouz A E, Taupitz M, Wolf K J. Focal liver lesions: characterization with non-enhanced and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.  Radiology. 1994;  190 417-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Högemann D, Flemming P, Kreipe H, Galanski M. Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology in hepatic angiomyolipoma.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 1389-1395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hollett M D, Jeffrey R B, Nino-Murcia M, Jorgensen M J, Harris D P. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (≤ 1,5cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms.  AJR. 1995;  164 879-884
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hwang G J, Kim M J, Yoo H S, Lee J T. Nodular HCC: Detection with arterial-, portal-, and delayed phase images at spiral CT.  Radiology. 1997;  202 383-388
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Itai Y, Moss A A, Goldberg H I. Transient hepatic attenuation difference of lobar and segmental distribution detected by dynamic CT.  Radiology. 1982;  144 835-839
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ito . et al . Transient increased attenuation in the gallbladder bed in pts with gallbladder disease.  Radiology. 1997;  204 723-728
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lacomis J M, Baron R L, Oliver J H, Nalesnik M A, Federle M P. Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns.  Radiology. 1997;  203 98-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mahfouz A E, Hamm B, Wolf K J. Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic Gd-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions.  Radiology. 1994;  197 317-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Miller W J, Dodd G D, Federle M P, Baron R L. 1992 EH of the liver: imaging findings with pathologic correlation.  AJR. 1992;  159 53-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Miller W J, Baron R L, Dodd G D, Federle M P. Malignancies in patients with cirrhosis: CT sensitivity and specificity in 200 consecutive transplant patients.  Radiology. 1994;  193 645-650
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ngan H. Lipiodol computerized tomography: how sensitive and specific is the technique in the diagnosis of HCC?.  Brit J Radiol. 1990;  63 771-775
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Oliver J H, Baron R L, Federle M P, Rockette H E. Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: value of unenhanced or arterial phase CT or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase contrast enhanced CT imaging.  AJR. 1996;  167 71-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Oliver J H, Baron R L, Federle M P, Jones B C, Sheng R. Hypervascular liver metastases: Do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection?.  Radiology. 1997;  205 709-715
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Patten R M, Byun J Y, Freeny P C. CT of hypervascular hepatic tumors: are unenhanced scans necessary for diagnosis?.  AJR. 1993;  161 979-981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pauleit D, Textor J, Bachmann R, Conrad R, Flacke S, Layer G, Kreft B, Schild H. HCC: Detection with Gd- FeO-enhanced MR imaging of the liver.  Radiology. 2002;  222 73-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Penkrot R J, van Thiel D. CT of cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: how sure are we?.  J Comput Tomogr. 1986;  10 309-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Quiroga S, Sebastia C, Pallisa E, Castella E, Perez-Lafuente M, Alvarez-Castells A. Improved diagnosis of hepatic perfusion disorders: value of hepatic arterial phase imaging during helical CT.  Radiographics. 2001;  21 65-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shamsi K, de Schepper A, Degryse H, Deckers F. FNH of the liver: radiologic findings.  Abdom Imaging. 1993;  18 32-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Soyer P, Bluemke D A, Reichle R, Calhoun P S, Bliss D F, Scherrer A, Fishman E K. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. I peripheral cholangiocarcinoma.  AJR. 1995;  165 1427-1431
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Takayasu K, Furukawa H, Wakao F, Muramatsu Y, Abe H, Terauchi T, Winter T C, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S. CT diagnosis of early HCC: Sensitivity, findings and Cytopathologic correlation.  AJR. 1995;  164 885-890
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Taournel P G, Pageaux G P, Coste V, Fabre J M, Pradel J A, Ramos J, Larrey D, Domergue J, Michel H, Bruel J M. Small HCC in patients undergoing liver transplantation: detection with CT after injection of iodized oil.  Radiology. 1995;  197 377-380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Theise N D, Schwartz M, Miller C, Thung S N. Macroregenerative nodules and HCC in 44 sequential adult liver explants with cirrhosis.  Hepatology. 1992;  16 949-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Utsunomiya T, Matsumata T, Adachi E, Honda H, Sugimachi K. Limitations of current preoperative liver imaging techniques for intrahepatic metastatic nodules of HCC.  Hepatology. 1992;  16 694-701
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme M P, Denys A, Terris B, Menu Y. Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathological correlation.  Radiographics. 2000;  20 379-397
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ward J, Guthrie J A, Scott D J. et al . HCC in the cirrhotic liver: double-contrast MR imaging for diagnosis.  Radiology. 2000;  216 154-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 White P G, Adams H, Smith P M. The CT appearance of angiosarcoma of the liver.  Clin Radiol. 1993;  48 321-325
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Yu J S, Kim K W, Sung K B. et al . Small arterial-portal venous shunts: a cause of pseudolesions at hepatic imaging.  Radiology. 1997;  203 737-742
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

PD Dr. Dagmar Högemann Savellano

Diagnostische Radiologie · Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1 · 30625 Hannover

Phone: +49(0)511 532 3128

Fax: +49(0)511 532

Email: hoegemann.dagmar@mh-hannover.de

      >