Download PDF
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2005; 73(12): 728-735
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-830258
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Motivationsbehandlung bei Patienten mit der Doppeldiagnose Psychose und Sucht

Motivational Interviewing for Patients with Comorbid Schizophrenia and Substance Abuse Disorders: A ReviewA.  Bechdolf1 , B.  Pohlmann1 , C.  Geyer1 , C.  Ferber1 , J.  Klosterkötter1 , E.  Gouzoulis-Mayfrank1
  • 1Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universität zu Köln (Direktor : Prof. Dr. J. Klosterkötter)
gefördert durch das Köln Fortune Programm (154/2003) der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 May 2005 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit schizophrenen Störungen und Komorbiditäten in Form eines Substanzabusus oder einer Substanzabhängigkeit [Doppeldiagnosepatienten (DD)] zeigen einen besonders ungünstigen Krankheitsverlauf und wenig Bereitschaft, speziell entwickelte integrierte Behandlungsangebote in Anspruch zu nehmen. Deshalb wurden die bei Suchterkrankungen ohne weitere Komorbidität bereits erfolgreich angewendete Motivationsbehandlung („Motivational Interviewing”, MI), welche darauf abzielt, die intrinsische Motivation für eine Veränderung hinsichtlich des Problemverhaltens zu fördern, für DD adaptiert. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird eine Übersicht über die derzeitige empirische Evidenz für die Effektivität von MI bei DD gegeben. Eine Literatursuche in den Datenbanken MEDLINE, EMBASE und PsycInfo wurde durchgeführt und die Qualität der identifizierten Studien nach Kriterien der Cochrane-Gesellschaft und denen von Jadad u. Mitarb. beurteilt. Es wurden 4 randomisierte Studien mit insgesamt 334 Teilnehmern identifiziert, in denen MI von 1 - 3 Sitzungen Dauer mit unterschiedlichen Kontrollinterventionen über einen Katamnesezeitraum bis zu 6 Monaten verglichen wurden. Bezüglich der Hauptinterventionsziele „Inanspruchnahme weiterführender psychotherapeutischer Behandlung” (1 × positiv, 2 × negativ) und „Substanzkonsum/Abstinenz” (1 × positiv, 1 × negativ) kamen die Studien zu widersprüchlichen Ergebnissen. Bei allen 4 Studien fanden sich erhebliche allgemeine Limitationen (Randomisierungsmodus, Verblindung der Rater, Beschreibung der Studien- und Therapieabbrecher) sowie spezielle methodische Mängel (Stichprobengröße und -homogenität, Dauer des MI, Verlauf des Motivationsstadiums). Schlussfolgernd ist derzeit nicht zu entscheiden, ob die mangelnde empirisch zu zeigende Effektivität auf die oben genannten methodischen Probleme zurückzuführen ist oder ob MI bei DD tatsächlich nicht wirkt. Demzufolge besteht erheblicher Forschungsbedarf zu MI bei DD.

Abstract

Patients with schizophrenia and substance abuse disorders [dually diagnosed patients (DD)] show an unfavourable course of the illness and little interest in participating on specific integrated treatment programmes. Motivational interviewing (MI) has been shown to be effective among other substance abuse disorders and it aims to enhance intrinsic motivation to change problem behaviour. MI has been adapted for DD. The present paper reviews the empirical evidence for the efficacy of MI in DD. A search in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO was conducted and the methodological quality of the identified trials was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration and to the JADAD Scale. We identified 4 randomised studies with a total of 346 participants, in which MI interventions of 1 to 3 sessions were compared with various control conditions over a follow-up period of up to 6 months. With regard to the main outcome measures „subsequent participation at integrated treatment programme” (1 × positive, 2 × negative) and „substance use” (1 × positive, 1 × negative,) the studies gained contradictory results. In all 4 studies, there were relevant general methodological limitations (randomisation, blindness of raters, description of the reasons for drop-outs) and specific methodological shortcomings (sample size and sample homogenity, numbers of MI sessions, assessment of motivational status). Hence, at present the evidence for supporting MI in DD is not clear. This may be due to the methodological problems mentioned above or it may be that there is, in fact, no effect. Therefore, there is an urgent need for further research of MI in DD.

Literatur

  • 1 Regier D A, Farmer M E, Rae D S, Locke B Z, Keith S J, Judd L L, Goodwin F K. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse.  JAMA. 1990;  264 2511-2518
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Mueser K T, Yarnold P R, Bellack A S. Diagnostic and demographic correlates of substance abuse in schizophrenia and major affective disorder.  Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992;  85 48-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mueser K T, Yarnold P R, Rosenberg S D, Swett Jr C, Miles K M, Hill D. Substance use disorder in hospitalized severely mentally ill psychiatric patients: prevalence, correlates and subgroups.  Schizophr Bull. 2000;  26 179-192
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Dixon L. Dual diagnosis of substance abuse in schizophrenia: prevalence and impact on outcomes.  Schizophr Res. 1999;  35 (suppl) 93-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Duke P J, Pantelis C, McPhillips M A, Barnes T R. Comorbid non-alcohol substance misuse among people with schizophrenia: epidemiological study in central London.  Br J Psychiatry. 2001;  179 509-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Carpenter M D, Mulligan J C, Bader I A, Meinzer A E. Multiple admissions to an urban psychiatric center: a comparative study.  Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985;  36 (12) 1305-1308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Drake R E, Wallach M A. Substance abuse among the chronic mentally ill.  Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989;  40 1041-1046
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Haywood T W, Kravitz H M, Grossman L S, Cavanaugh Jr J L, Davis J M, Lewis D A. Predicting the „revolving door” phenomenon among patients with schizophrenic, schizoaffective and affective disorders.  Am J Psychiatry. 1995;  152 313-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cohen L J, Test M A, Brown R J. Suicide and schizophrenia: data from a prospective community treatment study.  Am J Psychiatry. 1990;  147 602-607
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Landmark J, Cernovsky Z Z, Merskey H. Correlates of suicide attempts and ideation in schizophrenia.  Br J Psychiatry. 1987;  151 18-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Margolese H C, Malchy L, Negrete J C, Tempier R, Gill K. Drug and alcohol use among patients with schizophrenia and psychoses: levels and consequences.  Schizophr Res. 2004;  67 (2 - 3) 157-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Soyka M, Albus M, Immler B, Kathmann N, Hippius H. Psychopathology in dual diagnosis and non-addicted schizophrenics - are there differences?.  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;  251 (5) 232-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Barrowclough C, Haddock G, Tarrier N, Lewis S W, Moring J, O'Brien R, Schofield N, McGovern J. Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing, Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Family Intervention for Patients With Comorbid Schizophrenia and Substance Use Disorders.  Am J Psychiatry. 2001;  158 1706-1713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bellack A S, DiClemente C. Treating substance abuse among patients with schizophrenia.  Psychiatr Serv. 1999;  50 75-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brooks A J, Penn P E. Comparing treatments for dual diagnosis: twelve-step and self-management and recovery training.  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003;  29 (2) 359-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Carey K B. Substance use reduction in the context of outpatient psychiatric treatment: a collaborative, motivational, harm reduction approach.  Community Ment Health J. 1996;  32 (3) 291-306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Drake R E, Mueser K T, Clark R E, Wallach M A. The course, treatment and outcome of substance disorder in persons with severe mentall illness.  Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1996;  66 42-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. Komorbidität Psychose und Sucht. Darmstadt: Steinkopf 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Lehman A F, Dixon L B. Double jeopardy chronic mental illness and substance use disorders. Sycamore: Harwood Academic Publishers 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Ziedonis D M, Fisher W. Assessment and treatment of comorbid substance abuse in individuals with schizophrenia.  Psychiatr Ann. 1994;  24 447-493
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. Doppeldiagnose Psychose und Sucht.  Nervenarzt. 2004;  75 642-650
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Minkoff K. An integrated treatment model for dual diagnosis of psychosis and addiction.  Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1989;  40 1031-1036
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Osher F C. A vision for the future: toward a service system responsive to those with co-occurring addictive and mental disorders.  Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1996;  66 71-76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Drake R E, Yovetich N A, Bebout R R, Harris M, McHugo G J. Integrated treatment for dually diagnosed homeless adults.  J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997;  185 298-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Drake R E, Mercer-McFadden C, Mueser K T, McHugo G J, Bond G R. Review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders.  Schizophr Bull. 1998;  24 589-608
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Drake R E, Mueser K T. Psychosocial approaches to dual diagnosis.  Schizophr Bull. 2000;  26 105-118
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Ziedonis D M, Trudeau K. Motivation to quit using substances among individuals with schizophrenia: implications for a motivation-based treatment model.  Schizophr Bull. 1997;  23 (2) 229-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Heckhausen H. Motivation und Handeln. Berlin: Springer 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Amelang M, Bartussek D. Differenzielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Miller W R, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing. New York: Guilford Press 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Prochaska J O, DiClemente C C. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors.  Prog Behav Modif. 1992;  28 183-218
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Prochaska J O, Velicer W F, DiClemente C C, Guadagnoli E, Rossi J S. Patterns of change: Dynamic typology applied to smoking cessation.  Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;  26 83-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Miller W R, Sovereign R G, Krege B. Motivational Interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The drinker's check-up as a preventive intervention.  Behav Cognitive Psychother. 1988;  16 251-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Miller W R, Benefield B, Tonigan J S. Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: A controlled comparison of two therapist styles.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;  61 455-461
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Brown J M, Miller W R. Impact of motivational interviewing on participation and outcome in residential alcoholism treatment.  Psychol Addict Behav. 1993;  7 211-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bien T H, Miller W R, Boroughs J M. Motivational Interviewing With Alcohol Outpatiens.  Behav Cognitive Psychother. 1993;  21 347-356
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Butler C C, Rollnick S, Cohen D, Russell I, Bachmann M, Stott N. Motivational consulting versus brief advice for smokers in general practice: A randomised trial.  Br J Gen Pract. 1999;  49 611-616
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Saunders B, Wilkinson C, Phillips M. The impact of a brief motivational intervention with opiate users attending a methadone programme.  Addiction. 1995;  90 415-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Smith D E, Heckemeyer C M, Kratt P P, Mason D A. Motivational interviewing to improve adherence to a behavioral weight-control program for older obese women with NIDDM: A pilot study.  Diabetes Care. 1997;  20 53-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Stotts A L, Schmitz J M, Rhoades H M, Grabowski J. Motivational interviewing with cocaine-dependent patients: A pilot study.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001;  69 858-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Treasure J L, Katzman M, Schmidt U, Troop N, Todd G, DeSilva P. Engagement and outcome in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: First phase of a sequential design comparing motivation enhancement therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy.  Behav Res Ther. 1999;  37 405-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Martino S, Carroll K, Kostas D, Perkins J, Rounsville B. Dual Diagnosis Motivational Interviewing for substance-abusing patients with psychotic disorders.  J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002;  23 (4) 297-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Fowler I, Carr V J, Carter N T, Lewin T J. Patterns of current and lifetime substance use in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 1998;  24 443-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Carey K B, Purnine D M, Maisto S A, Carey M P. Enhancing readiness-to-change substance abuse in persons with schizophrenia. A four-session motivation-based intervention.  Behav Modif. 2001;  25 (3) 331-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Mulrow C D, Oxman A D. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. In: The Cochrane Libary. The Cochrane Collaboration,. Oxford: Update Software 2004: Issue 2
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Jadad A R, Moore A, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D JM, Gavaghan D J, McQuay H J. Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trial: Is Blinding Necessary?.  Control Clin Trials. 1996;  17 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Baker A, Lewin T, Reichler H, Clancy R, Carr V, Garrett R, Sly K, Devir H, Terry M. Motivational interviewing among psychiatric in-patients with substance use disorders.  Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;  106 (3) 233-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Graeber D A, Moyers T B, Griffith G, Guajardo E, Tonigan S. A pilot study comparing motivational interviewing and an educational intervention in patients with schizophrenia and alcohol use disorders.  Community Ment Health J. 2003;  39 (3) 189-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Martino S, Carroll K M, O'Malley S S, Rounsville B J. Motivational interviewing with psychiatrically ill substance abusing patients.  Am J Addict. 2000;  9 (1) 88-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Swanson A J, Pantalon M V, Cohen K R. Motivational interviewing and treatment adherence among psychiatric and dually diagnosed patients.  J Nerv Ment Dis. 1999;  187 (10) 630-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Horn D H van, Bux D A. A pilot test of motivational interviewing groups for dually diagnosed inpatients.  J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001;  20 (2) 191-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 McLellan A T, Luborsky L, Woody G E, O'Brien C P. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: the Addiction Severity Index.  J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;  168 26-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Darke S, Ward J, Hall W, Heather N, Wodak A. The opiate treatment index (OTI) researcher's manual. Technical report no. 11. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Miller W R, Marlatt A G. Brief Drinker Profile (BDP) Interview Booklet. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Miller W R, Tonigan J S. Assessing drinkersŽ motivation for change: The Stages of Change and Treatment Readiness Scale (Socrates).  Psychol Addict Behav. 1996;  10 81-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Biener L, Abrams D B. The contemplation ladder: validation of a measure of readiness to consider smoking cessation.  Health Psychol. 1991;  10 360-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 McConnaughy E A, DiClemente C C, Prochaska J O, Velicer W F. Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report.  Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1989;  26 494-503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Stephens R S, Roffmann R A, Curtin L. Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;  68 (5) 898-908
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Schneider R J, Casey J, Kohn R. Motivational versus confrontational interviewing: a comparison of substance abuse assessment practices at employee assistance programs.  J Behav Health Serv Res. 2000;  27 (1) 60-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Project MATCH Research Group . Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes.  J Stud Alcohol. 1997a;  58 (1) 7-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Moher D, Schulz K F, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.  JAMA. 2001;  285 (15) 1987-1991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Moher D, Schulz K F, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.  Ann Intern Med. 2001;  134 (8) 657-662
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. med. Andreas Bechdolf

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Universität zu Köln

Kerpener Str. 62

50924 Köln

Email: andreas.bechdolf@uk-koeln.de

      >