Rofo 2005; 177(8): 1094-1102
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858365
Herz

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

MR-Angiographie und Flussreservenbestimmung nach minimalinvasiver direkter Koronararterien-Bypass(MIDCAB)-Operation der linken Arteria mammaria interna im Vergleich zur Mehrzeilen-CT

MR Angiography and Determination of the Flow Reserve After Minimal Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) Surgery of the Left Internal Mammary Arteria in Comparison to the Multidetector-Row CTN. I. Stauder1 , H. Stauder2 , M. Fenchel1 , A. Küttner1 , U. Kramer1 , A. M. Scheule2 , C. D. Claussen1 , S. Miller1
  • 1Abteilung Radiologische Diagnostik, Universitätsklinik Tübingen
  • 2Abteilung Thorax-, Herz- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinik Tübingen
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 July 2005 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Evaluation eines MR-Protokolls zur postoperativen Untersuchung des minimalinvasiv angelegten A.-mammaria-interna-Bypass (MIDCAB) mittels kontrastmittelgestützter 3D-MR-Angiographie und Bestimmung der Flussreserve. Material und Methoden: 19 symptomatische (Angina pectoris CCS I-III, intermittierende nicht anginatypische thorakale Schmerzen, Narbenschmerzen) Patienten (59,9 ± 7,9 Jahre) nach MIDCAB wurden 6,9 ± 1,5 Jahre postoperativ untersucht. Die Bypassdarstellung erfolgte mit einer nicht EKG-getriggerten MR-Angiographiesequenz (1,4 × 0,9 × 1,0 mm³, 22 s) in Atemstillstand nach Gabe von 25 ml Gd-DTPA. Phasenkontrastflussmessungen (1,1 × 1,1 × 5 mm³, 42 ms zeitliche Auflösung, retrospektives Gating, Venc 90 cm/s) im Bypass in Ruhe und nach medikamentöser Stressbelastung mit Dipyridamol (0,56 mg/kg KG) folgten. Als Referenz dienten die Multi-Detektor-CT-Angiographie (16-Zeilen-CT) und in 9 Fällen eine invasive Bypassangiographie. Ergebnisse: Von den MIDCAB waren 4/19 (koronarangiographisch bestätigt) verschlossen und 4/19 hochgradig (> 70 %) stenosiert. Die Beurteilung der distalen Anastomose des LIMA-Bypass gelang in 47 %. In den offenen Bypasses konnte ein signifikanter Flussanstieg von in Ruhe 75,4 ± 33,3 ml/min auf 202,7 ± 49,6 ml/min nach Stressinduktion (p < 0,002) gemessen werden. Mit der Kombination der MRA und Flussreservenbestimmung konnten alle stenotischen Bypasses detektiert werden. Schlussfolgerung: Die Kombination der MR-Angiographie mit Flussmessung erhöht die Aussagekraft und diagnostische Sicherheit der MRT in der postoperativen Verlaufskontrolle von Patienten nach MIDCAB.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate graft patency, flow and flow reserve in patients with minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) of internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts using a combined MR protocol with phase-contrast technique and MR angiography. Material and Methods: At a 1.5T Magnetom Sonata (SIEMENS), 19 symptomatic (angina CCS I-III, intermittent thoracic discomfort, scar disorders) patients (59.9 ± 7.9 years old) with 19 left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafts implanted in minimal invasive technique were examined 6.9 ± 1.5 years post surgery. Contrast enhanced MR angiography (TR 2.5 ms, TE 1 ms, flip angle 20o, spatial resolution 1.4 × 0.9 × 1.0 mm³, breath hold technique, no ECG-triggering, 25 ml Gd-DTPA) was performed to assess bypass patency. Phase-contrast flow measurements with retrospective gating (TR 41 msec, TE 3.2 msec, flip angle 30°, spatial resolution 1.1 × 1.1 × 5 mm³, temporal resolution 42 msec, venc 90 cm/sec) were applied in the IMA grafts at rest and after stress induction with dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg/BW). For comparison, graft patency was evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography (16-row CT). In 9 patients a selective catheter angiography was performed. Results: MIDCAB grafts were occluded in 4/19 patients. In 4 patients the anastomosis to LAD was highly stenotic (> 70 %) at MDCT (2 experienced investigators in consensus reading). In MRA 9 grafts could be delineated completely including the distal anastomosis to LAD (47 %). In 9 patients the distal part could not be evaluated. In patients with patent grafts (MDCT), a significant improvement of graft flow (at rest 75.4 ± 33.3 ml/min; after stress 202.7 ± 49.6; P < 0.002) and flow reserve (patent grafts 3.0 ± 1.1; stenotic grafts 1.5 ± 0.2, P < 0.02; occluded grafts 0.9 ± 0.2, P < 0.01) after stress induction was detected. Diastolic-to-systolic peak velocity ratios (D/S-PVR) at baseline were not significant between patent and stenotic grafts. Mean flow at baseline and after stress induction and flow reserve show a high sensitivity (91/92 /83 %) and specificity (86 /100/83 %) for detection of graft stenosis. MR angiography combined with flow reserve measurements could distinguish between occluded/stenotic and patent grafts in all MIDCAB grafts. Conclusion: MR imaging allows combined assessment of bypass patency and flow with flow reserve in patients after MIDCAB. The protocol of this study is applicable for the evaluation of graft patency in patients after revascularization.

Literatur

  • 1 Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) . A Randomized Trial of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.  Circulation. 1983;  5 951-960
  • 2 Calafiore A M, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G. et al . Left anterior descending coronary artery grafting via left anterior small thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass.  Ann Thoracic Surg. 1996;  61 1658-1665
  • 3 Possati G, Gaudino M, Alessandrini F. et al . Minithoracotomy myocardial revascularization: results of early angiographic control.  G-Ital-Cardiol. 1997;  27 749-757
  • 4 Cameron A, Davis K B, Green G. et al . Coronary Bypass surgery with Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts - Effects on survival over a 15-year period.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 216-219
  • 5 Johnson L W, Krone R. Cardiac catheterization 1991: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCA&I).  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;  28 219-220
  • 6 Silber S, Finsterer S, Krischke I. et al . Noninvasive angiography of coronary bypass grafts with cardio-CT in a cardiology practice.  Herz. 2003;  28 126-135
  • 7 Nieman K, Pattynama P MT, Rensing B J. et al . Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries.  Radiology. 2003;  229 749-756
  • 8 Wintersperger B J, Bastarrika G, Nikolaou K. et al . EKG-gesteuerte Bypass-CT-Angiographie-Einsatz in der Darstellung arterieller Bypässe.  Radiologe. 2004;  44 140-145
  • 9 Miller S, Scheule A M, Hahn U. et al . MR angiography and flow quantification of the internal mammary artery graft after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.  Am-J-Roentgenol. 1999;  172 1365-1369
  • 10 Ishida N, Sakuma H, Cruz B P. et al . MR flow measurement in the internal mammary artery-to-coronary artery bypass graft: comparison with graft stenosis at radiographic angiography.  Radiology. 2001;  220 441-447
  • 11 Debatin J F, Strong J A, Sostman H D. et al . MR Characterization of Blood Flow in Native and Grafted Internal Mammary Arteries.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;  3 443-450
  • 12 Langerak S E, Kunz P, Vliegen H W. et al . Improved MR Flow mapping in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts during adenosine-induced stress.  Radiology. 2001;  218 540-547
  • 13 Stauder N I, Miller S, Scheule A M. et al . 2D-Phasenkontrast-Flußquantifizierung und kontrastangehobene 3D-MR-Angiographie zur perioperativen Untersuchung des Arteria mammaria interna Bypasses.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2001;  173 790-797
  • 14 Wintersperger B J, Engelmann M G, von-Smekal A. et al . Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography: value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique.  Radiology. 1998;  208 345-351
  • 15 Brenner P, Wintersperger B, von Smekal A. et al . Detection of coronary artery graft patency by contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.  Eur J of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 1999;  15 389-393
  • 16 Vrachliotis T G, Bis K G, Alibadi D A. et al . Contrast-Enhanced Breath-Hold MR Angiography for Evaluating Patency of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.  Am-J-Roentgenol. 1997;  168 1073-1080
  • 17 Bunce N H, Lorenz C H, John A S. et al . Coronary artery bypass graft patency: Assessment with true FISP imaging with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.  Radiology. 2003;  227 440-446
  • 18 Rubinstein R I, Askenase A D, Thickman D. et al . Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts.  Circulation. 1987;  76 786-791
  • 19 Galjee M A, van Rossum A C, Doesburg T. et al . Quantification of coronary artery bypass graft flow by magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.  Magn Reson Imag. 1996;  14 485-493
  • 20 Kreitner K F, Ehrhard K, Kunz R P. et al . Koronare Bypassdiagnostik mit CT und MRT - eine Bestandsaufnahme.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2004;  176 1079-1088
  • 21 Aurigemma G P, Reichek L, Axel L. et al . Noninvasive determination of coronary artery bypass graft patency by cine magnetic resonance imaging.  Circulation. 1989;  80 1595-1602
  • 22 Langerak S E, Vliegen H W, de Roos A. et al . Detection of vein graft disease using high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography.  Circulation. 2002;  105 328-333
  • 23 Takagi T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K. et al . Noninvasive assessment of left internal mammary artery graft patency using duplex Doppler echocardiography from supraclavicular fossa.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;  22 1647-1652
  • 24 Bach R G, Kern M J, Donohue T J. et al . Comparison of phasic blood flow velocity characteristics of arterial and venous coronary artery bypass conduits.  Circulation. 1993;  88 II-133 - 140
  • 25 Crowley J J, Shapiro L M. Noninvasive assessment of left internal mammary artery graft patency using transthoracic echocardiography.  Circulation. 1995;  92 (9 suppl) II25-II30
  • 26 Hoogendoorn L I, Pattynama P MT, Buis B. et al . Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping.  Am J Cardiol. 1995;  75 845-848

Dr. med. Norbert I. Stauder

Abteilung Radiologische Diagnostik, Universitätsklinik Tübingen

Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3

72076 Tübingen

Phone: ++ 49/70 71/2 98 58 37

Fax: ++ 49/70 71/29 53 92

Email: norbert.stauder@med.uni-tuebingen.de

    >