Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2005; 9(4): 180-185
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858713
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Unmittelbare Effekte von Mulligans Bent-leg-raise-Technik in einer Population mit Kreuzschmerzen

Immediate Effects of Mulligan’s Bent Leg Raise Technique in a Population with Low Back PainA. Schäfer, T. Hall, S. Hardt, L. Wallin
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 14.07.2005

Manuskript akzeptiert: 15.08.2005

Publication Date:
19 October 2005 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Um die unmittelbaren Effekte von Mulligans BLR-Technik auf Patienten mit Kreuzschmerzen mit oder ohne begleitenden Oberschenkelschmerz zu untersuchen, wurde ein randomisierter plazebokontrollierter Blindversuch durchgeführt. Alle Probanden erhielten eine einzelne Behandlung. Die Ergebnisse der Studie lassen auf einen förderlichen Effekt der BLR-Technik bei Kreuzschmerzenpatienten mit einseitig eingeschränktem SLR schließen.

Abstract

A randomised placebo controlled blind trial was performed in order to investigate the immediate effects of Mulligan's BLR technique in patients with low back pain, with or without accompanying thigh pain. Each subject received one single treatment. The study results suggest a beneficial effect of the BLR technique for low back pain patients with unilateral restricted SLR.

Schlüsselwörter

Kreuzschmerzen - Mulligan - eingeschränkter SLR

Key words

Low back pain - Mulligan - reduced SLR

Literatur

  • 1 Adams M A, Bogduk N, Burton K. et al .The Biomechanics of Backpain. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Beyerlein C, Hall T M, Hansson U. et al . Effektivität der Mulligan-Straight-Leg-Raise-Traktionstechnik auf die Beweglichkeit bei Patienten mit Rückenschmerzen.  Manuelle Therapie. 2002;  6 61-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Blunt K L, Rajwani M H, Guerriero R C. The effectiveness of chiropractic management of fibromyalgia patients: A pilot study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.  1997;  20 389-398
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Breig A, Troup J DG. Biomechanical considerations in the straight-leg-raising test - cadaveric and clinical studies of the effects of medial hip rotation.  Spine. 1979;  4 242-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Burns S H, Mierau D R. Chiropractic management of low back pain of mechanical origin. Giles LGF, Singer KP Chiropractic management of low back pain of mechanical origin Oxford; Butterworth-Heinemann 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Butler D S. Mobilisation des Nervensystems. Berlin; Springer 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Clark S, Christiansen A, Hellman D F. et al . Effects of ipsilateral anterior thigh soft tissue stretching on passive unilateral straight leg raise.  Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1999;  29 4-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Deville W LJM, van der Windt D AWM, Dzaferagic A. et al . The test of Lasègue.  Spine. 2000;  25 1140-1147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Deyo R A, Rainville J, Kent D L. What can history and physical examination tell us about low back pain?.  The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992;  268 760-770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dixon J K, Keating J L. Variability in straight leg raise measurements: Review.  Physiotherapy. 2000;  86 361-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Doege T C. Guide to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Chicago; American Medical Association 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Farrar J T. What is clinically meaningful: outcome measures in pain clinical trials.  Clinical Journal of Pain. 2000;  16 S106-S112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Goeken L N, Hof A L. Instrumental straight leg raising: results in patients.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1994;  75 470-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Grieve G P. Sciatica and the straight-leg-raising-test in manipulative treatment.  Physiotherapy. 1970;  56 337-346
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hall T M, Cacho A, McNee C. et al . Effects of Mulligan traction straight leg raise on range of movement.  The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy. 2001;  9 128-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hall T M, Elvey R L. Evaluation and treatment of neural tissue pain disorders. Donatelli RA, Wooden MJ Evaluation and treatment of neural tissue pain disorders New York; Churchill Livingstone 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hall T M, Elvey R L. Management of mechanosensitivity of the nervous system in spinal pain syndromes. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Hanten W P, Chandler S. Effects of myofascial release leg pull and sagital plane isometric contract-relax technique on passive straight leg raise angle.  Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 1994;  20 138-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Harvey L A, Byak A J, Ostrovskaya M. et al . Randomised trial of the effects of four weeks of daily stretch on extensibility of hamstring muscles in people with spinal cord injuries.  Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2003;  49 176-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Koes B W, van Tulder M W, Ostelo R. et al . Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: An international comparison.  Spine. 2001;  26 2504-2513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lehman G J, McGill S M. Spinal manipulation causes variable spine kinematic and trunk muscle electromyographic responses.  Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2001;  16 293-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Meszaros T F, Olson R, Kulig C. et al . Effect of 10 %, 30 % and 60 % body weight traction on the straight leg raise test of symptomatic patients with low back pain.  Journal of Orthopadic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2000;  30 595-601
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mior S. Manipulation and mobilization in the treatment of chronic pain.  Clinical Journal of Pain. 2001;  17 S70-S76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mounce K. Back pain.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;  41 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mulligan B R. Manual Therapy: „nags”, „snags”, „mwms”, etc. Wellington, N.Z.  Plane View Services. 2004; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nachemson A L, Waddell G, Norlund A I. Epidemiology of neck and low back pain. Nachemson AL, Jonsson E Epidemiology of neck and low back pain Philadelphia; Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Rowbotham M. What is a „clinically meaningful” reduction in pain?.  Pain. 2001;  131-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Scott J, Huskisson E C. Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales.  Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. 1979;  560
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Strong J. Pain: A textbook for therapists. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Sullivan M K, Dejulia J J, Worrell T W. Effect of pelvic position and stretching method on hamstring muscle flexibility.  Medical Science and Sports Exercise. 1992;  24 1383-1389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Waddell G. The Back Pain Revolution. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Wall P D. The placebo and placebo response. Wall PD, Melzack R The placebo and placebo response Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Worrell T W, Smith T L, Winegardner J. Effect of hamstring stretching on hamstring muscle performance.  Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 1994;  20 154-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Wright A. Pain-relieving effects of cervical manual therapy. Grant R Pain-relieving effects of cervical manual therapy New York; Churchill Livingstone 2002
    Google Scholar

Axel Schäfer, Master Manip Ther PT

Rombergstr. 4

D-20255 Hamburg

Email: meender@web.de

      >