Braucht psychiatrische Versorgungsforschung randomisierte kontrollierte Studien?

Literatur

• 1 Tyrer P. Methods for evaluating community treatments. In: Thornicroft G, Szmukler G Textbook of Community Psychiatry. Oxford; Oxford University Press 2001: 63-72
• 2 Geddes L, Harrison P. Closing the gap between research and practice.  Br J Psychiatry. 1997;  171 220-225
• 3 Chilvers R, Macdonald G M, Hayes A A. Supported housing for people with severe mental disorders (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Chichester, UK; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2004
• 4 Catty J, Burns T, Comas A. Day centres for severe mental illness (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Chichester, UK; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2004
• 5 Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A, Creed F, Sledge W, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiersma D. Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library , Issue 3. Oxford; Update Software 2003
• 6 Marshall M, Gray A, Lockwood A, Green R. Case management for people with severe mental disorders (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford; Update Software 2003
• 7 Crowther R, Marshall M, Bond G, Huxley P. Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford; Update Software 2003
• 8 Marshall M, Lockwood A. Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford; Update Software 2003
• 9 Baig S S. Consolidated report on projects funded under research and technological development activities of a generic nature and support for research infrastructures. Luxembourg; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2003
• 10 Hotopf M, Churchill R, Lewis G. Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in psychiatry.  Br J Psychiatry. 1999;  175 217-223
• 11 Slade M, Priebe S. Conceptual limitations of randomised controlled trials. In: Priebe S, Slade M Evidence in mental health care. New York; Brunner-Routledge 2002: 101-108
• 12 Johnson T. Clinical trials in psychiatry: background and statistical perspective.  Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1998;  7 209-234
• 13 Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.  BMJ. 1996;  312 15-18
• 14 Taylor R, Thornicroft G. Uses and limits of randomised controlled trials in mental health services research. In: Thornicroft G, Tansella M Mental health outcome measures. Heidelberg; Springer 1996: 143-151
• 15 Marshall M. Randomised controlled trials - misunderstanding, fraud and spin. In: Priebe S, Slade M Evidence in mental health care. New York; Brunner-Routledge 2002: 59-71
• 16 Abel U, Koch A. The role of randomization in clinical studies: Myths and beliefs.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;  52 487-497
• 17 Altmann D G, Schulz K F, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche P C, Lang T. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.  Ann Intern Med. 2001;  134 663-694
• 18 Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials.  JAMA. 2001;  285 1992-1995
• 19 Kallert T W, Schützwohl M. Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien in der psychiatrischen Versorgungsforschung: Probleme der Durchführungspraxis.  Fortschr Neurol Psychiat. 2002;  70 647-656
• 20 MacFarlane W, Dushay R, Stasny P, Deakins S, Link B. A comparison of two levels of family-aided assertive community treatment.  Psychiatr Serv. 1996;  47 744-750
• 21 Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Mental health services research. In: Priebe S, Slade M Evidence in mental health care. New York; Brunner-Routledge 2002: 81-100
• 22 Rothwell P M. External validity of randomised controlled trials: „To whom do the results of this trial apply?”.  Lancet. 2005;  365 82-93
• 23 Brewin C R, Bradley C. Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.  BMJ. 1989;  299 313-315
• 24 Muche R, Imhof A. SARAH-Studiengruppe . Das Comprehensive Cohort Design als Alternative zur randomisierten kontrollierten Studie in der Rehabilitationsforschung: Vor- und Nachteile sowie Anwendung in der SARAH-Studie.  Rehabilitation. 2003;  42 343-349
• 25 Gilbody S, Whitty P. Improving the delivery and organisation of mental health services: beyond the conventional randomised controlled trial.  Br J Psychiatry. 2002;  180 13-18
• 26 Kallert T W, Leiße M, Kulke C, Kluge H. Evidenzbasierung gemeindepsychiatrischer Versorgungsangebote in Deutschland: Eine Bestandsaufnahme.  Gesundheitswesen. 2005;  67 342-354