PDF herunterladen
Zentralbl Gynakol 2006; 128(6): 318-326
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-921561
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Chemotherapie des metastasierten Mammakarzinoms

Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast CancerP. Schmid1 , 2 , K. Possinger2
  • 1Charing Cross and Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • 2Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Onkologie und Hämatologie, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
10. Januar 2007 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Ziele palliativer Behandlungsmaßnahmen sind eine Besserung tumorbedingter Beschwerden, der Erhalt der körperlichen Leistungsfähigkeit und der Lebensqualität und eine Verlängerung der Überlebenszeit. Aufgrund der unterschiedlichen Krankheitsverläufe sollte die Behandlungsführung individuell angepasst werden. Endokrine Therapien oder Monochemotherapien kommen vor allem für Frauen in Betracht, die sich in einer günstigen oder intermediären prognostischen Situation befinden und eine langsame Progression des Tumorgeschehens bzw. geringe tumorbedingte Beschwerden aufweisen. Für Patientinnen mit ungünstiger Prognose oder ausgeprägten tumorbedingten Beschwerden erscheinen hingegen eher Polychemotherapien indiziert. Die Anthrazykline sind eine der wirksamsten Substanzgruppen und behalten auch nach adjuvanter Anthrazyklin-Vorbehandlung eine hohe Effektivität bei. Zur Verringerung der Kardiotoxizität kann eine Verlängerung der Infusionsdauer, eine wöchentliche Fraktionierung oder der Einsatz liposomaler Präparate erfolgen. Taxane weisen keine vollständige Kreuzresistenz zu Anthrazyklinen auf und können sowohl in wöchentlichen oder dreiwöchentlichen Intervallen verabreicht werden. Nach Versagen von Anthrazyklinen und Taxanen können Capecitabin, Vinorelbin oder Gemcitabin zum Teil noch zu objektiven Remissionen oder einer vorübergehenden Krankheitsstabilisierung führen. Die Entscheidung über die Dauer der zytostatischen Therapiemaßnahmen muss individuell gemeinsam mit der Patientin festgelegt werden.

Abstract

Primary goals of treatment in metastatic breast cancer include prevention and palliation of symptoms, maintenance or improvement of quality of life and prolongation of survival. In order to account for the variability of clinical courses, treatment decisions have to be made on an individual basis. Low risk patients without evidence of rapid disease progression or symptomatic disease are mainly considered for endocrine treatment or single agent chemotherapy, whereas patients at higher risk with rapidly progressive or symptomatic disease are candidates for polychemotherapies. Anthracyclines are one of the most active group of agents and remain active after adjuvant pre-treatment. The use of liposomal derivatives or weekly or prolonged application can decrease the risk of cardiotoxicity. There is only incomplete cross-resistance between anthracyclines and taxanes. Taxane-based weekly or 3weekly regimens are therefore generally used in anthracycline-pretreated patients. Capecitabine, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine constitute candidate agents after failure of anthracyclines and/or taxanes and may result in objective responses or disease stabilisation. Data on the continuation beyond third-line chemotherapy are insufficient. Decisions have therefore to be made on an individual basis.

Schlüsselwörter

Metastasiertes Mammakarzinom - palliative Therapie - Chemotherapie - Anthrazykline - Taxane - Capecitabin - Vinorelbin

Key words

metastatic breast cancer - palliation - chemotherapy - anthracyclines - taxanes - capecitabine - vinorelbin

Literatur

  • 1 Carrick S, Parker S, Wilcken N. et al .Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. The Cochrane Database of systematic reviews 2005; Issue 2
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Schmid P, Wischnewsky M B, Sezer O, Pape W, Possinger K. Prognostic factors are more important for overall survival (OS) than treatment outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).  Ann Oncol. 2000;  11 (Suppl 4) 27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lück H J, Thomssen C, Untch M. et al . Multicentric Phase III Study in first line treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer (ABC). Epirubicin/Paclitaxel (ET) vs Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide (EC). A study of the Ago Breast Cancer Group (abstr).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2000;  19 280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Biganzoli L, Cufer T, Bruning P. et al . Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: EORTC 10961.  J Clin Oncol. 2002;  20 3114-3121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jassem J, Pienkowski T, Pluzanska A. et al . Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: final results of a randomized phase III multicenter trial.  J Clin Oncol. 2001;  19 1707-1715
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nabholtz J A, Falkson C, Campos D. et al . Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial.  J Clin Oncol. 2003;  21 968-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tubiana-Hulin M, Bonneterre J, Bougnoux P. et al . Better survival with epirubicin-paclitaxel (ET) combination as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Final results of a phase II randomized study (abstr.).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;  22 46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mackay J R, Paterson A, Dirix L. et al . Final results of the phase III randomized trial comparing docetaxel (T), doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) to FAC as first line chemotherapy (CT) for patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (abstr).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;  21 137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ghersi D, Wilcken B, Simes J, Donoghue E. Taxane containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. The Cochrane Database of systematic reviews 2005; Issue 2
    Google Scholar
  • 10 O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S. et al . Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: Phase III trial results.  J Clin Oncol. 2002;  20 2812-2823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 O'Shaughnessy J, Nag S, Calderillo-Ruiz. et al . Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (GT) versus paclitaxel (T) as first-line treatment for anthracycline pre-treated metastatic breast cancer: Interim analysis of a global phase III study.  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;  22 # 25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Albain K, Nag S, Calderillo-Ruiz G. et al . Global phase III study of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (GT) versus paclitaxel (T) as frontline therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC): First report of overall survival (abstr 510).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004;  22 25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Slamon D J, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S. et al . Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 783-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Miller K D, Wang M, Gralow J. et al .E2100 - a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel versus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastastic breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Schmid P, Possinger K. High-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer.  Med Klin. 2002;  97 677-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Farquhar C, Basser R, Hetrick S, Lethaby A, Marjoribanks J. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. The Cochrane Database of systematic reviews 2005; Issue 2
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Schmid P, Schippinger W, Nitsch T. et al . Up front tandem high-dose chemotherapy compared to standard chemotherapy with doxorubicin and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized trial.  J Clin Oncol. 2005;  23 432-440
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stadtmauer E A, O'Neill A, Goldstein L J. et al . Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer.  New Engl J Med. 2000;  342 1069-1076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Crump M, Gluck S, Stewart D. et al . A randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell support compared to standard therapy in women with metastatic breast cancer: A national cancer institute of canada (NCIC) clinical trials group study (abstr).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;  20 82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lotz J, Cure H, Janvier M. et al . Intensive therapy and autograft of hematopoetic stem cells in treating metastatic breast cancer: results of the national programme PEGASE 04.  Hematol Cell Ther. 1999;  41 71-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Biron P, Durand M, Roche H. et al . High dose thiotepa, cyclophosphamide (CPM) and stem cell transplantation after 4 FEC 100 compared with 4 FEC alone allowed better disease survival but the same overall survival in first line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Results of the PEGASE 03 French Protocols (abstr.).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002;  21 167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Crown J, Leyvraz S, Perey L. et al . Superiority of tandem high-dose chemotherapy over conventional-dose chemotherapy in unselected patients with metastatic breast cancer: the International Randomized Breast Cancer Dose Intensity Study. Proc San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (abstr).  Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2003;  82 (Suppl 1) 633
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Paridaens R, Biganzoli L, Bruning P. et al . Paclitaxel vs doxorubicin as first-line single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized study with cross over.  J Clin Oncol. 2000;  18 724-733
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D. et al . Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 1999;  17 2341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Keller A M, Mennel R G, Georgoulias V A. et al . Randomized Phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 2004;  22 3893-3901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 O'Brien M E, Wigler N, Inbar M. et al . Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.  Ann Oncol. 2004;  15 440-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Batist G, Ramakrishnan G, Sekhar Rao C. et al . Reduced cardiotoxicity and preserved antitumour efficacy of liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in a randomized, multicenter trial of metastatic breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 2001;  19 1444-1454
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Harris L, Batist G, Belt R. et al . Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin compared with conventional doxorubicin in a randomized multicenter trial as first-line therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma.  Cancer. 2002;  94 25-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 O'Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S. et al . Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: Phase III trial results.  J Clin Oncol. 2002;  20 2812-2823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jones S, Erban J, Overemoyer B. et al . Randomized trial comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (abstr 10).  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;  82 (Suppl 1) 59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 O'Shaughnessy J, Nag S, Calderillo-Ruiz. et al . Gemcitabine plus Paclitaxel (GT) versus paclitaxel (T) as first-line treatment for anthracycline pre-treated metastatic breast cancer: Interim analysis of a global phase III study (abstr 25).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;  22 25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sledge G W, Nauberg D, Bernardo P. et al . Phase III trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup trial (E1193).  J Clin Oncol. 2003;  21 588-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Seidman A, Berry D, Cirrincione C. et al . CALGB 9840: Phase III study of weekly (w) paclitaxel via 1-hour (h) infusion versus standard (S) 3 h infusion every third week in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with trastuzumab (T) for HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer and randomized for T in HER-2 normal MBC (abstr 512).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004;  22 6 s
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tabernero J, Climent M A, Lluch A. et al . A multicentre, randomised phase II study of weekly or 3-weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.  Ann Oncol. 2004;  15 1358-1365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Blum J L, Jones S E, Buzdar A U. et al . Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 1999;  17 485-493
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Talbot D C, Moiseyenko V, Van Belle S. et al . Randomized, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines.  Br J Cancer. 2002;  86 1367-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Reichardt P, Minckwitz G, Thuss-Patience P C. et al . Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy.  Ann Oncol. 2003;  14 1227-1233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Fumoleau P, Largillier R, Clippe C. et al . Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.  Eur J Cancer. 2004;  40 536-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Blum J L, Dieras V, Lo Russo P M. et al . Multicenter, phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma.  Cancer. 2001;  92 1759-1768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 O'Shaughnessy J A, Blum J, Moiseyenko V. et al . Randomized, open label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (xeloda) vs a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer.  Ann Oncol. 2001;  12 1247-1254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Canobbio L, Boccardo F, Pastorino G. et al . Phase-II study of Navelbine in advanced breast cancer.  Semin Oncol. 1989;  16 (Suppl 4) 33-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Weber B L, Vogel C, Jones S. et al . Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 1995;  13 2722-2730
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Romero A, Rabinovich M G, Vallejo C T. et al . Vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma.  J Clin Oncol. 1994;  12 336-341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Twelves C J, Dobbs N A, Curnow A. et al . A phase II, multicentre, UK study of vinorelbine in advanced breast cancer.  Br J Cancer. 1994;  70 990-993
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Garcia-Conde J, Lluch A, Martin M. et al . Phase II trial of weekly IV vinorelbine in first-line advanced breast cancer chemotherapy.  Ann Oncol. 1994;  5 854-857
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Gasco M, Gardin G, Repetto L, Campora E, Rosso R. Vinorelbine as palliative therapy in advanced breast cancer.  Anticancer Res. 1997;  17 1431-1433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Gasparini G, Caffo O, Barni S. et al . Vinorelbine is an active antiproliferative agent in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study.  J Clin Oncol. 1994;  12 2094-2101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Degardin M, Bonneterre J, Hecquet B. et al . Vinorelbine (navelbine) as a salvage treatment for advanced breast cancer.  Ann Oncol. 1994;  5 423-426
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Wargin W A, Lucas V S. The clinical pharmacokinetics of vinorelbine (Navelbine).  Semin Oncol. 1994;  21 (Suppl 10) 21-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Freyer G, Delozier T, Lichinister M. et al . Phase II study of oral vinorelbine in first-line advanced breast cancer chemotherapy.  J Clin Oncol. 2003;  21 35-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Blackstein M, Vogel C L, Ambinder R. et al . Gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II trial.  Oncology. 2002;  62 2-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Possinger K, Kaufmann M, Coleman R. et al . Phase II study of gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer.  Anticancer Drugs. 1999;  10 155-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Carmichael J, Possinger K, Phillip P. et al . Advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial with gemcitabine.  J Clin Oncol. 1995;  13 2731-2736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Brodowicz T, Kostler W J, Moslinger R. et al . Single-agent gemcitabine as second- and third-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer.  Breast. 2000;  9 338-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Gerson R, Serrano O A, Villalobos A, Ortiz C, Sanchez-Forgach R. Gemcitabine response in advanced breast cancer in relation to immunohistochemical factors (abstr 572).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2000;  19 572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Smorenburg C H, Bontenbal M, Seynacve C. et al . A phase II Study of weekly gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing or failing both an anthracycline and a taxane.  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;  66 83-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Spielmann M, Llombart-Cussac A, Kalla S. et al . Single agent gemcitabine is active in previously treated metastatic breast cancer.  Oncology. 2001;  60 303-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Valerio M R, Cicero G, Armata M G. et al . Gemcitabine in pretreated breast cancer (abstr 1953).  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;  20 1953
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Feher O, Vodvarka P, Jassem J. et al .Randomized phase III study of epirubicin versus gemcitabine chemotherapy in elderly females with metastatic breast cancer. European Breast Cancer Conference 2002; abstr 110
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Schmid P, Akrivakis K, Flath B. et al . A phase II trial of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in metastatic breast cancer.  Anticancer Drugs.. 1999;  10 625-631
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. P. Schmid , Consultant Medical Oncologist & Senior Clinical Lecturer · Director Early Clinical Trials Unit

Charing Cross and Hammersmith Hospital · Imperial College London

Fulham Palace Road

London, W6 8RF

United Kingdom

Telefon: +44/20/88 46 14 18

eMail: p.schmid@imperial.ac.uk

      >