RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000121.xml
Orthopedic Trauma Directions 2006; 4(5): 21-28
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944323
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944323
Clinical topic
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Conservative treatment for closed fifth metacarpal (small finger) fractures
Early versus delayed mobilizationWeitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
09. Oktober 2006 (online)
Summary
Evidence from five small, quasi-randomized control trials (class of evidence II) indicates that initially, range of motion may be better for patients with early mobilization compared with delayed mobilization; however, differences were minimized by three to six months. Early mobilization patients may experience greater joint motion and return to work sooner. There is no significant difference in reports of pain between treatment groups. Additional rigorous comparative studies that use validated assessments and are large enough to detect rare complications (ie, nonunion, rotation) are needed.