Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32(5): 472-479
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-947860
Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Diagnosing von Willebrand Disease: A Large Reference Laboratory's Perspective

Dorothy M. Adcock1 , Melissa Bethel1 , Andre Valcour2
  • 1Esoterix, Inc., Aurora, Colorado
  • 2Center for Esoteric Testing, Laboratory Corporation of America, Burlington, North Carolina
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 July 2006 (online)

ABSTRACT

Von Willebrand disease (vWD) is a common bleeding disorder. Diagnosis requires the demonstration of both clinical and laboratory features consistent with this disorder. Laboratory evaluation is complex, due in part to the variety of assays available and differing opinions regarding the optimum testing methodologies and algorithms required. This study represents a retrospective analysis of cases (n = 497) evaluated in our laboratory in which results for von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimeric analysis, vWF antigen, ristocetin cofactor activity, and collagen-binding activity were available. Results were compared to determine which assay parameters best correlate with one another, alone or in combination, and best correlate with the pattern and distribution of multimers. We demonstrate that performance of vWF activity or antigen assays in isolation can lead to both the overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of vWD. Incorporation of the collagen-binding assay into the diagnostic algorithm leads to a reduced potential for misdiagnosis or misclassification of vWD and can reduce the number of multimeric analyses required dramatically.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Sadler J E, Mannucci P M, Berntorp E et al.. Impact, diagnosis and treatment of von Willebrand disease.  Thromb Haemost. 2000;  84 160-174
  • 2 Levy G, Ginsburg D. Getting at the variable expressivity of von Willebrand disease.  Thromb Haemost. 2001;  86 144-148
  • 3 Sadler J E. von Willebrand disease type 1: a diagnosis in search of a disease.  Blood. 2003;  101(6) 2089-2093
  • 4 Montgomery R R. Structure and function of von Willebrand factor. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, et al Hemostasis and Thrombosis Basic Principles & Clinical Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001: 249-274
  • 5 Ruggeri Z M, Zimmerman T S. Von Willebrand factor and von Willebrand disease.  Blood. 1987;  70 895-901
  • 6 Favaloro E J. von Willebrand factor collagen-binding (activity) assay in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: a 15-year journey.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002;  28 191-202
  • 7 Marlar R A, Adcock D M, Arkin C F et al.. Assays of von Willebrand factor antigen and ristocetin cofactor activity; approved guideline. NCCLS document H51-A [ISBN 1-56238-473-2]. 2002
  • 8 Favaloro E J, Bonar R, Sioufi J et al.. Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;  119 882-893
  • 9 Rodgers S E, Lerda N V, Favaloro E J et al.. Identification of von Willebrand disease type 2N (Normandy) in Australia: a cross-laboratory investigation using different methods.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;  118(2) 269-276
  • 10 Favaloro E J, Smith J, Petinos P et al.. Laboratory testing for von Willebrand's disease: an assessment of current diagnostic practice and efficacy by means of a multi-laboratory survey.  Thromb Haemost. 1999;  82 1276-1282
  • 11 Favaloro E J, Aboud M, Arthur C. Possibility of potential vWD misdiagnosis or misclassification using LIA technology and due to the presence of rheumatoid factor.  Am J Hematol. 2001;  66 53-56
  • 12 Turecek P L, Siekmann J, Schwarz H P. Comparative study on collagen-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and ristocetin cofactor activity assays for detection of functional activity of von Willebrand factor.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002;  28(2) 149-159
  • 13 Favaloro E J. Laboratory identification of von Willebrand Disease: technical and scientific perspectives.  Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;  32 456-471
  • 14 Favaloro E J. Collagen binding assay for von Willebrand factor (VWF:CBA): detection of von Willebrand disease and discrimination of vWD subtypes, depends on collagen source.  Thromb Haemost. 2000;  83 127-135
  • 15 Raines G, Aumann H, Sykes S, Street A. Multimeric analysis of von Willebrand factor by molecular sieving electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulphate agarose gel.  Thromb Res. 1990;  60 201-212
  • 16 Aihara M, Sawada Y, Ueno K et al.. Visualization of von Willebrand factor multimers by immunoenzymatic stain using avidin-biotin peroxidase complex.  Thromb Haemost. 1986;  55 263-267
  • 17 Mannucci P M, Abildgaard C F, Gralnick H R et al.. Multicenter comparison of von Willebrand factor multimer sizing techniques.  Thromb Haemost. 1985;  54(4) 873-877
  • 18 Sadler J E. A revised classification of von Willebrand disease.  Thromb Haemost. 1994;  71(4) 520-525
  • 19 Schneppenheim R. The evolving classification of von Willebrand disease.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2005;  16(suppl 1) S3-S10
  • 20 Mannucci P M. How I treat patients with von Willebrand disease.  Blood. 2001;  97(7) 1915-1919
  • 21 Mannucci P M. Treatment of von Willebrand's disease.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 683-694
  • 22 Berntorp E, Petrini P. Long-term prophylaxis in von Willebrand disease.  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2005;  16 (suppl 1) S23-S26
  • 23 Favaloro E J, Bonar R, Kershaw G et al.. Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disorder: use of multiple functional assays reduces diagnostic error rates.  Lab Hematol. 2005;  11 91-97
  • 24 Casonato A, Pontara E, Bertomoro A et al.. von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: an alternative to ristocetin co-factor activity?.  Br J Haematol. 2001;  112 578-583
  • 25 Riddell A F, Jenkins P V, Nitu-Whalley I C et al.. Use of collagen-binding assay for von Willebrand factor in the analysis of type 2M von Willebrand disease: a comparison with the ristocetin cofactor assay.  Br J Haematol. 2002;  116 187-192
  • 26 Federici A B, Canciani M T, Forza I et al.. Ristocetin cofactor and collagen binding activities normalized to antigen levels for a rapid diagnosis of type 2 von Willebrand disease.  Thromb Haemost. 2000;  84 1127-1128
  • 27 Favaloro E J. A duplex issue: (i) time to re-appraise the diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disorder, and (ii) clarification of the roles of von Willebrand factor collagen binding and ristocetin cofactor activity assays.  Haemophilia. 2002;  8 828-831
  • 28 Casonato A, Pontara E, Bertomoro A et al.. Which assay is the most suitable to investigate von Willebrand functional activity?.  Thromb Haemost. 1999;  81 994-995
  • 29 Rodeghiero F, Castaman G C, Dini E. Epidemiological investigation of the presence of von Willebrand's disease.  Blood. 1987;  69 454-459

Dorothy M AdcockM.D. 

Esoterix, Inc.

3176 S. Peoria Ct, Aurora, CO 80014

Email: Dot.Adcock@esoterix.com

    >