Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2006; 131: S247-S251
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-956283
Übersicht | Review article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Erfolge der Blutdrucksenkung bei Diabetes-Patienten

Aggressive treatment of hypertension provides dramatic cardiovascular benefit in diabetic patientsG. Schernthaner1
  • 11. Medizinische Abteilung Rudolfstiftung Wien
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 22.2.2006

akzeptiert: 10.8.2006

Publication Date:
30 November 2006 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Entscheidend für die Prognoseverbesserung bei Typ-2-Diabetes ist die breite Umsetzung der Studienergebnisse auf Populationsebene durch eine Verbesserung der Qualität des Blutdruck-Managements. Bei Typ-2-Diabetikern sollten Blutdruckzielwerte von unter 130/80 mmHg angestrebt werden, die allerdings trotz antihypertensiver Kombinationstherapien in den Interventionsstudien bisher zumeist nicht erreicht wurden. Aufgrund der bei Patienten mit Mikroalbuminurie oder manifester diabetischer Nephropathie beträchtlich erhöhten kardiovaskulären Mortalität werden hier noch niedrigere Blutdruckwerte (z. B. von 120/80 mmHg) empfohlen. Ob durch besonders niedrige Blutdruckwerte deren kardiovaskuläre Mortalität weiter gesenkt werden kann, ist bisher noch unsicher. Die Blutdrucksenkung bei Diabetespatienten ist bezüglich der Risikosenkung und Prognoseverbesserung besonders effektiv und möglicherweise erfolgreicher als bei Nicht-Diabetikern. Die Frage nach einer antihypertensiven Monotherapie stellt sich bei Diabetikern relativ selten, da die überwiegende Mehrheit aller Typ-2-Diabetiker zumindest zwei oder oft mehrere Antihypertensiva benötigt, um die angestrebten Zielwerte zu erreichen. Der Effekt der Blutdrucksenkung auf kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen dürfte bei Diabetikern im Vergleich zu Nicht-Diabetikern deutlich stärker ausgeprägt sein, wofür das weitaus höhere Risiko der hypertensiven Diabetespatienten verantwortlich sein dürfte.

Summary

Diabetes and hypertension frequently coexist, and their combination provides additive increases in the risk of life-threatening cardiovascular events. Recent guidelines agree (JN-VII) on the need for early, aggressive reduction of blood pressure, with a goal of < 130/80 mmHg, in patients with diabetes. The mechanism responsible for the increased sensitivity of diabetics to hypertension is not known, but may involve attenuated nocturnal decrease (non-dipping) of blood pressure. Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes provides dramatic cardiovascular benefit. Aggressive blood pressure control may be the most important factor in preventing adverse outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Target diastolic blood pressures of less than 80 mm Hg and systolic targets less than 135 mm Hg appear optimal. All classes of antihypertensive agents are effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with diabetes, and all show evidence of a concomitant reduction in cardiovascular risk. Although there is evidence that agents that interrupt the renin-angiotensin system system may be superior in both the nephroprotection and cardioprotection, however the data are not totally conclusive. However, most diabetics and especially diabetic patients with nephropathy will require combination therapy („antihypertensive cocktail”) to reach goal blood pressure. Hypertensive patients have a significantly increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes, and antihypertensive drugs can also significantly influence the risk for that. While diuretics and ß-blockers have a prodiabetic effect, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers may prevent diabetes more effectively than the metabolically neutral calcium channel blockers.

Literatur

  • 1 Adler A I, Stratton M, Neil H AW. et al . Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular complications of type-2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study.  BMJ. 2000;  321 412-419
  • 2 American Diabetes Association . Treatment of Hypertension in Adults With Diabetes.  Diab Care. 2003;  (Suppl 1) 26 S80-S82
  • 3 Andersen N H, Poulsen P L, Knudsen S T. et al . Long-term dual blockade with candesartan and lisinopril in hypertensive patients with diabetes: the CALM II study.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 273-277
  • 4 Andros V, Egger A, Dua U. Blood pressure goal attainment according to JNC 7 guidelines and utilization of antihypertensive drug therapy in MCO patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.  J Manag Care Pharm. 2006;  12 303-309
  • 5 Barnett A H, Bain S C, Bouter P. et al . Angiotensin-receptor blockade versus converting-enzyme inhibition in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy (IDEAL).  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 1952-1961
  • 6 Brenner B M, Cooper M E, De Zeeuw D. et al. for the RENAAL Study Investigators . Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 861-869
  • 7 Brown M J, Castaigne A, De Leeuw P W. et al . Influence of diabetes and type of hypertension on the response to antihypertensive treatment.  Hypertension. 2000;  35 1038-1042
  • 8 Casas J P, Chua W, Loukogeorgakis S. et al . Effect of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system and other antihypertensive drugs on renal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.  Lancet. 2005;  366 2026-2033
  • 9 Chobanian A V, Bakris G L, Black H R. et al. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee . The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.  JAMA. 2003;  289 2560-2572
  • 10 Curb J D, Pressel S L, Cutler J A. et al . Effect of diuretic-based Antihypertensive treatment on cardiovascular disease risk in older diabetic patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group.  JAMA. 1996;  276 1886-1892
  • 11 Eliasson B, Cederholm J, Nilsson P. et al . The gap between guidelines and reality: Type 2 diabetes in a National Diabetes Register 1996 - 2003.  Diabet Med. 2005;  22 1420-1426
  • 12 Fox J C, Leight K, Sutradhar S C. et al . The JNC 7 approach compared to conventional treatment in diabetic patients with hypertension: a double-blind trial of initial monotherapy vs. combination therapy.  J Clin Hypertens. 2004;  6 437-442
  • 13 Giunti S, Cooper M. Management strategies for patients with hypertension and diabetes: why combination therapy is critical.  J Clin Hypertens. 2006;  8 108-113
  • 14 Grossmann E, Messerli F H, Goldbourt U. High blood pressure and diabetes mellitus. Are all antihypertensive drugs created equal?.  Arch Intern Med. 2000;  160 2447-2452
  • 15 Hansson L, Lindholm L H, Niskanen L. et al . Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial.  Lancet. 1999;  353 611-616
  • 16 Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers S G. et al . Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: Principal results of the hypertension optimal treatment (HOT) randomised trial.  Lancet. 1998;  351 1755-1762
  • 17 Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study Investigators . Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy.  Lancet. 2000;  355 253-259
  • 18 Hypertension in Diabetes Study (HDS) . Prevalence of hypertension in newly presenting type-2 diabetic patients and the association with risk factors for cardiovascular and diabetic complications.  J Hypertens. 1993;  11 309-317
  • 19 Karalliedde J, Viberti G. Evidence for renoprotection by blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertension and diabetes.  J Hum Hypertens. 2006;  20 239-253
  • 20 Lewis E J, Hunsicker L G, Clarke W R. et al . Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist Irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes (IDNT).  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 851-860
  • 21 Lindholm L H, Hansson L, Ekbom T. et al . Comparison of antihypertensive treatments in preventing cardiovascular events in elderly diabetic patients: results from the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2.  J Hypertens. 2000;  18 1671-1675
  • 22 Lindholm L H, Ibsen H, Dahlöf B. et al . Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol.  Lancet. 2002;  359 1004-1010
  • 23 Ott P, Benke I, Köhler C, Hanefeld M. und die DIG-Studiengruppe . Qualität der Therapie des Metabolischen Syndroms.  Diabetes, Stoffwechsel und Herz. 2006;  15 9-18
  • 24 Parving H H, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J. et al . The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 870-878
  • 25 Pohl M A, Blumenthal S, Cordonnier D J. et al . Independent and additive impact of blood pressure control and angiotensin II receptor blockade on renal outcomes in the irbesartan diabetic nephropathy trial: clinical implications and limitations.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;  16 3027-3037
  • 26 Ronnback M, Isomaa B, Fagerudd J. et al . Complex relationship between blood pressure and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients: a follow-up of the Botnia Study.  Hypertension. 2006;  47 168-173
  • 27 Rossing K, Schjoedt K J, Jensen B R, Boomsma F, Parving H H. Enhanced renoprotective effects of ultrahigh doses of irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.  Kidney Int. 2005;  68 1190-1198
  • 28 Ruggenenti P, Fassi A, Ilieva A P. et al. Bergamo Nephrologic Diabetes Complications Trial (BENEDICT) Investigators . Preventing microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 1941-1951
  • 29 Schernthaner G. Antihypertensive Therapy. Martin Dunitz Publishers. London In: Textbook of Type 2 Diabetes. Eds. Goldstein B.J. & Müller-Wieland 2003: 29.1-29.16
  • 30 Schernthaner G. Fortschritte in der Prävention des Typ 2 Diabetes.  Wien KlinWochenschr. 2003;  115 745-757
  • 31 Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton J D, Wentworth D. for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Group . Diabetes, other risk factors and 12-year cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial.  Diabetes Care. 1993;  16 434-444
  • 32 The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) . Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs. Diuretic.  JAMA. 2002;  288 2981-2997
  • 33 Tuomilehto J, Rastenyte D, Birkenhager W H. et al . Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes and systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators.  N Engl J Med. 1999;  340 677-684
  • 34 UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complication in type-2 diabetes: UKPDS 38.  BMJ. 1998;  317 703-713
  • 35 UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type-2 diabetes: UKPDS 39.  BMJ. 1998;  317 713-720
  • 36 Wolf G, Ritz E. Diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes prevention and patient management.  J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;  14 1396-1405
  • 37 Zhang Y, Lee E T, Devereux R B. et al . Prehypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease risk in a population-based sample: the Strong Heart Study.  Hypertension. 2006;  47 410-414

Univ.-Prof. Dr. Guntram Schernthaner

Vorstand der 1. Medizinischen Abteilung Rudolfstiftung Wien

Juchgasse 25

A-1030 Wien

Fax: 0043/1/711652109

Email: guntram.schernthaner@wienkav.at

    >