Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 28(4): 249-252
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1022089
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Microemboli during Extracorporeal Circulation

H.-J. Krebber, J. D. Hill, J. J. Osborn, A. Jatrides
  • Institut of Medical Science, Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, USA, and Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Experimental Cardiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 March 2008 (online)

Summary

Though filtration of the blood return from the coronary suction line has become widely accepted, there is still some question about the benefits of arterial line filters and combinations of different filter positions. Blood was sampled at 5, 15 and 30 minutes on extracorporeal heart-lung bypass (ECC) and at the end of bypass in 23 patients. All added donor blood was filtered through microporous filters (F1). In 11 instances a coronary suction line filter (F2) was in place. Blood was sampled before and after the arterial line filter and in the venous blood. All samples were studied for screen filtration pressure (SFP), and particle count, using apertures from 8 to 120 microns. Simultaneously white blood cell count, platelet count, hematocrit and level of free hemoglobin were done.

The particle counts were summarized in 2 groups: large particles ranging from 12,8 to 120 microns and small particles ranging from 8 to 12.7 microns. The filter combinations F1 F2 F1F3 and F1F2 F3 were studied. All of the filters were found to be capable of filtering large-sized particles. Slight improvement was seen by using the F1F2 F3 combination. A high gradient for the count of the large particles was found across the arterial line filter. Small particles were noted to derive predominantly from the coronary suction line filter. While the low-flow coronary suction line filter was well capable of removing particles of small size, there was no difference in the number of small particles found proximally and distally to the arterial line filter. Combinations of filters did not improve the results in removing small particles.

    >