Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2007; 39(1): 48-52
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-960556
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag

Praktischer Nutzen und klinische Relevanz des Binding-Effektes

Practical Use and Clinical Relevance of BindingK. Schwarz1 , A. G. Crismani1 , N. Strobl1 , H.-P. Bantleon1
  • 1Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie, Bernhard Gottlieb Universitätszahnklinik Wien, Österreich
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 March 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Eine Komponente der einer Zahnbewegung entgegenwirkenden Kraft stellt das so genannte Binding dar. Dabei handelt es sich um eine durch zunehmende Angulation des Zahnes hervorgerufene elastische Deformation des Drahtes. Die freie Gleitbewegung des Bogens durch den Bracketslot wird dadurch erschwert. Im Falle einer vorliegenden Drei-Bracket-Beziehung zeichnet sich dieser Klemmeffekt durch die dabei generierten horizontalen und somit lückenöffnenden Kraftkomponenten aus. Klinisch bedeutet dies für den Kieferorthopäden die Vermeidung von zusätzlichen lückenöffnenden Hilfselementen wie Druckfedern oder elastischen Ketten.

Abstract

During the alignment phase binding of the archwire is counteracting tooth movement. The higher the angle between bracketslot and wire the greater the elastic deformation hindering sliding of the tooth. For a buccaly blocked out canine the model of a three-bracket-relationship shows horizontally active forces opening up the space for the canine without the use of additional elements like open coil springs or elastic chains.

Schlüsselwörter

dislozierter Eckzahn - Friktion - Binding - Notching

Key words

dislocated canine - friction - Binding - Notching

Literatur

  • 1 Broadbent B H. Ontogenetic development of occlusion.  Angle Orthod. 1941;  11 223-341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dewel B F. The upper cuspid: its development and impaction.  Angle Orthod. 1949;  19 79-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dachi S F, Howell F V. A survey of 3,874 routine full mouth radiographs.  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path. 1961;  14 1165-1169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish school children.  Scand J Dent Res. 1973;  81 12-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hitchin A D. The impacted maxillary canine.  Br Dent J. 1956;  100 1-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rayne J. The unerupted maxillary canine.  Dent Pract. 1969;  19 194-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic examination of ectopically erupting maxillary canines.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987;  91 483-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Becker A. Einordnung verlagerter Zähne. Köln: Deutscher Zahnärzteverlag DÄV-Hanser GmbH; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kusy R P, Whitley J Q. Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials.  Semin Orthod. 1997;  3 166-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Thorstenson G A, Kusy R P. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;  121 472-482
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kusy R P, Whitley J Q. Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for Binding.  Eur J Orthod. 1999;  21 199-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Thorstenson G A. Systematic approach to the resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliance.  www.3MUnitek.com
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Kapur R, Sinna P K, Nanda R S. Comparison of frictional resistance in titanium and stainless steel brackets.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;  116 271-274
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kusy R P, Whitley J Q. Resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances in dry and wet states: influence of archwire alloy, interbracket distance, and bracket engagement.  J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;  52 797-811
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Thorstenson G A, Kusy R P. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.  Angle Orthod. 2003;  73 418-430
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Articolo L C, Kusy K, Saunders C R, Kusy R P. Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the Notching of archwires during clinical treatment.  Eur J Orthod. 2000;  22 409-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hansen J D, Kusy R P, Saunders C R. Archwire damage from ceramic brackets via Notching.  Orthod Rev. 1997;  11 27-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Burstone C J, Koenig H A. Force systems from an ideal arch.  Am J Orthod. 1974;  65 270-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Scheriau M, Enislidis G, Bantleon H-P. Die Drei-Bracket-Beziehung.  Inf Orthod Kieferorthop. 2003;  35 9-12
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher H-A. Frictional forces between bracket and archwire.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989;  96 397-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bednar J R, Gruendeman G W, Sandrik J L. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;  100 513-522
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Frank C A, Nikolai R J. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and archwire.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1980;  78 593-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. K. Schwarz

Abteilung für Kieferorthopädie · Bernhard Gottlieb Universitätszahnklinik Wien

Währingerstr. 25 a

1090 Wien

Österreich

Phone: +43 / 1 / 4 27 76 71 11

Fax: +43 / 1 / 4 27 76 71 19

Email: kerstin.schwarz@meduniwien.ac.at

      >