PDF icon Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2007; 11(4): 188-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963513
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Umsetzung der ICF und der ICF Core Sets für lumbale Rückenschmerzen in der Rehabilitation

Teil 2Applying the ICF and ICF Core Sets for Low Back Pain in RehabilitationPart 2M. Kirschneck1 , A. Gläßel1 , S. Wilke2 , G. Stucki1, 2
  • 1Institut für Gesundheits- und Rehabilitationswissenschaften, ICF Research Branch of the WHO CC FIC (DIMDI), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
  • 2Klinik und Poliklinik für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 11.7.2006

Manuskript akzeptiert: 30.8.2006

Publication Date:
10 September 2007 (online)

Also available atphysioLink
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Zusammenfassung

Der 2. Teil des Artikels veranschaulicht die Anwendung der ICF Core Sets für LBP im klinischen Alltag der Rehabilitation anhand des ICF-Modellblatts und eines Fallbeispiels.

Abstract

The second part of this article portrays the application of the ICF Core Sets for LBP in clinical rehabilitation practice using the ICF Model Sheet a case study.

Schlüsselwörter

ICF - ICF Core Set - LBP - Fallbeispiel

Key words

ICF - ICF Core Set - LBP - case study

Literatur

  • 1 Andersson G BJ. The epidemiology of spinal disorders. Frymoyer JW The adult spine: principles and practice Philadelphia; Lippincott-Raven 1997 2nd ed
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Andersson G B. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain.  Lancet. 1999;  354 581-585
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Atalay A, Arslan S, Dincer F. Psychosocial function, clinical status, and radiographic findings in a group of chronic low back pain patients.  Rheumatol Int. 2001;  21 62-65
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bekkering G E, Hendriks H JM, Koes B W. et al .National practice guidelines for physical therapy in patients with low back pain. 29.3.2006 www.cebp.nl/media/m31.pdf>
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Beurskens A JHM, Vet H CW, Köke A JA. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.  Pain. 1996;  65 71-76
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bombardier de C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations.  Spine. 2000;  25 3100-3103
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Bullinger M, Morfeld M, Kohlmann T. et al . Der SF-36 in der rehabilitationswissenschaftlichen Forschung - Ergebnisse aus dem Norddeutschen Verbund für Rehabilitationsforschung (NVRF) im Förderschwerpunkt Rehabilitationswissenschaften.  Rehablitation. 2003;  42  218-225
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T. et al . Linking Health-Status Measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.  J Rehabil Med. 2002;  34 1-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cieza A, Ewert T, Üstün Bedirhan T. et al . Development of ICF Core Sets for Patients with Chronic Conditions.  J Rehabil Med. 2004;  36 (Suppl 44) 9-11
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M. et al . ICF Core Sets for Low Back Pain.  J Rehabil Med. 2004;  Suppl 44 69-74
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S. et al . ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned.  Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2005;  37 212-218
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Cieza A, Stucki G. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): A Basis for Multidisciplinary Clinical Practice. American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Clinical care in rheumatic diseases Atlanta; ACR (in press) 3 rd ed
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Daltroy L H, Cats-Baril W L, Katz J N. et al . The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument. Reliability and Validity Tests.  Spine. 1996;  21 741-749
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A JHM. et al . Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain Research. A Proposal for Standardized Use.  Spine. 1998;  23 2000-2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Deyo R A, Weinstein J N. Low back pain.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 363-370
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Dionne C E, Borbonnais R, Frémont P. et al . A clinical return-to work rule for patients with back pain.  CMAJ. 2005;  172 1559-1567
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ehrlich G E, Khaltaev N G. Low back pain initiative. Department of Noncommunicable Diesease Management. Geneva; World Health Organization 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ehrlich G E. Back Pain.  The Journal of Rheumatology. 2003;  30 26-31
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Ehrlich G E. Low Back Pain.  Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003;  81 671-676
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ewert T, Geyh S, Grill E. et al . Die Anwendung der ICF der Neurorehabilitation anhand des ICF-Modellblattes und der ICF Core Sets.  Neurol Rehabil. 2005;  11 179-188
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Fairbank J C, Pynsent P B. The Oswestry Disability Index.  Spine. 2000;  25 2940-2952
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Fritz J M, Piva S R. Physical impairment index: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with acute low back pain.  Spine. 2003;  28 1189-1194
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Füßl M. Das biopsychosoziale Modell der ICF in der Manuellen Therapie.  Manuelle Therapie. 2003;  7 189-195
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Von Garnier K, Stamm T A, Ewert T. et al . Anwendung der Internationalen Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF) in der Ergotherapie. Ein Fallbeispiel.  ergoscience. 2006;  1 1-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Guyatt G H, Sullivan M J, Thompson P J. et al . The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure.  Can Med Assoc J. 1985;  132 919-923
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Hoogendoorn W E, Poppel M N, Bongers P M. et al . Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.  Spine. 2000;  25 2114-2125
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Hunt S M, McEwen van J, McKenna S P. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists.  J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;  35 185-188
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Hurwitz E L, Morgenstern H, Yu F. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of low-back pain and related disability with psychological distress among patients enrolled in the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;  56 463-471
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Jones T, Kumar S. Physical ergonomics in low-back pain prevention.  J Occup Rehabil. 2001;  11 309-319
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Tulder van M. et al . Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.  Spine. 2001;  26 262-269
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Kendall N AS, Linton S J, Main C J. Guide to assessing psychological yellow flags in acute low back pain: Risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. Wellington; Accident and Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee 1997
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 32 Kirschneck M, Gläßel A, Wilke S. et al . Umsetzung der ICF und ICF-Core-Sets für lumbale Rückenschmerzen in der Rehabilitation. Teil 1.  manuelletherapie. 2007;  3 101-109
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 33 Maetzel A, Li L. The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;  16 23-30
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 34 Main C J. The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ).  J Psychosom Res. 1983;  27 503-514
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Mayer T G, Barnes D, Kishino N D. et al . Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation I. A standardized Protocol and Normative Database.  Spine. 1988;  13 993-997
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Mayer T G, Barnes D, Nichols G. et al . Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation II. A comparison with Isokinetic Lifting in a disabled chronic low back pain industrial population.  Spine. 1988;  13 998-1002
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 37 Moldofsky H. Sleep and pain.  Sleep Med Rev. 2001;  5 385-396
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 38 Nordin M, Welser S, Campello M A. et al . Self-care techniques for acute episodes of low back pain.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002;  1 89-104
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 39 Picavet H S, Schouten J S. Physical load in daily life and low back problems in the general population -The MORGEN study.  Prev Med. 2000;  31 506-512
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 40 Pincus T, Burton A K, Vogel S. et al . A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.  Spine. 2002;  27 E109-E120
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 41 Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.  Spine. 2000;  25 3115-3124
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 Schochat T, Rehberg W, Kempis von J. et al . The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: Übersetzung und psychometrische Analyse der deutschen Version an einer Stichprobe von Rehabilitanden mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen.  Z Rheumatol. 2000;  9 303-313
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 43 Schoppink L EM, Tulder M W, Koes B W. et al . Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.  Phys Ther. 1996;  76 268-275
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Steiner W A, Ryser van L, Huber E. et al . Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine.  Phys Ther. 2002;  82 1098-1107
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 45 Stucki G, Sangha O. Clinical quality management: putting the pieces together.  Arthritis Care Res. 1996;  9 405-412
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Stucki G, Sangha O. Principles of rehabilitation. Klippel JH, Dieppe PA Rheumatology London; Mosby 1997 2nd ed
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 47 Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T. et al . Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice.  Disabil Rehabil. 2002;  24 281-282
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 48 Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine.  Disabil Rehabil. 2002;  24 932-938
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 49 Stucki G, Sigl T. Assessment of the impact of disease on the individual.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;  17 451-473
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 50 The Euroqol Group . Euroqol - a facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.  Health Policy. 1990;  16 199-208
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 51 Verbunt J A, Seelen H A, Vlaeyen J W. et al . Disuse and deconditioning in chronic low back pain: concepts and hypotheses on contributing mechanisms.  Eur J Pain. 2003;  7 9-21
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 52 Ware J E, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). A. Conceptual framework and item selection.  Medical Care. 1992;  30 473-483
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 53 Ware J E, Kosinski M, Keller S D. SF-12. How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center 1995
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 54 Wessely S, Hotopf M, Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue and its syndromes. Oxford; Oxford University Press 1998
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 55 World Health Organization (WHO) .International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). Geneva; WHO 1992 10th Rev
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 56 World Health Organization (WHO) .International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva; WHO 2001
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 57 World Health Organization (WHO) Technical Report Series .The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. Geneva; WHO 2003
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 58 World Health Organisziation (WHO) .Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF). 9.3.2006 www.dimdi.de/de/klassi/ICF/icf_dimdi_final_draft_1.pdf>
    Search in Google Scholar

Michaela Kirschneck

Institut für Gesundheits- und Rehabilitationswissenschaften, ICF Research Branch of the WHO CC FIC (DMDI), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität

Marchioninistr. 15

81377 München

Email: Michaela.Kirschneck@med.uni-muenchen.de